Neuronal mechanisms for pitch analysis in the time domain

SummaryMany units in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea fowl are found to be tuned to amplitude modulated tones (AM). For a given response maximum the relationship of the period τm of the modulation frequency fm and the period τc of the carrier frequency fc may be given by an empirical equation: m · τm + n · τc = 1 · τ1, where m, n and 1 are small integers typical for a unit. τ1 is a time constant of 0.4 ms. The temporal pattern of the neuronal response support these findings. The averages of spike trains oscillate with periods multiple to τ1. These oscillations are elicited by stimulus onsets and zero crossings of fm and may be coupled strongly to fm depending on fc. Variation of fm or fc shifts the mean delay of the phase coupled activity proportional to m · τm and n · τc, respectively. These effects may be explained with activity phase coupled to fc which coincides at the level of the recorded units with oscillations coupled to fm. This is expressed by the above given periodicity equation. Psychophysical results with AM-stimuli indicate that the mechanisms described and the periodicity equation are adequate for the explanation of the analysis of periodicity pitch in humans. Hence the period corresponding to pitch is defined by m · τm + n · τc = 1 · τ1, where n and 1 are integers and τ1 = 0.4 ms. Plots of τp as a function of τc reveal steps at 0.4 ms intervals indicating that the neuronal time constant is the same in both species.

[1]  H. Scheich,et al.  Coding of narrow-band and wide-band vocalizations in the auditory midbrain nucleus (MLD) of the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[2]  R. Galamboš,et al.  Microelectrode study of superior olivary nuclei. , 1959, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  F. Wightman The pattern-transformation model of pitch. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  S. S. Stevens Frequency Analysis and Periodicity Detection in Hearing. , 1972 .

[5]  Max F. Meyer,et al.  Theory of Hearing , 1950 .

[6]  G. Langner,et al.  Active phase coupling in electric fish: Behavioral control with microsecond precision , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  Russell R. Pfeiffer,et al.  Classification of response patterns of spike discharges for units in the cochlear nucleus: Tone-burst stimulation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Licklider,et al.  A duplex theory of pitch perception , 1951, Experientia.

[9]  E. Holst Die relative Koordination , 1939 .

[10]  Gerald Langner The periodicity matrix : a correlation model for central auditory frequency analysis , 1978 .

[11]  G van den Brink,et al.  Dichotic pitch fusion. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  N Y KIANG,et al.  STIMULUS CODING IN THE COCHLEAR NUCLEUS. , 1965, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[13]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Mechanisms of signal analysis and pattern perception in periodicity pitch. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.