Facial expressions as conditioned stimuli for electrodermal responses: a case of "preparedness"?

Converging data suggest that human facial behavior has an evolutionary basis. Combining these data with Seligman's preparedness theory, it was predicted that facial expressions of anger should be more readily associated with aversive events than should expressions of happiness. Two experiments involving differential electrodermal conditioning to pictures of faces, with electric shock as the unconditioned stimulus, were performed. In the first experiment, the subjects were exposed to two pictures of the same person, one with an angry and one with a happy expression. For half of the subjects, the shock followed the angry face, and for the other half, it followed the happy face. In the second experiment, three groups of subjects differentiated between pictures of male and female faces, both showing angry, neutral, and happy expressions. Responses to angry conditioned stimuli showed significant resistance to extinction in both experiments, with a larger effect in Experiment 2. Responses to happy or neutral conditioned stimuli, on the other hand, extinguished immediately when the shock was withheld. The results are related to conditioning to phobic stimuli and to the preparedness theory.

[1]  M. Seligman,et al.  Prepared phobias and obsessions: therapeutic outcome. , 1977, Behaviour research and therapy.

[2]  R. Hinde,et al.  Biological Bases Of Human Social Behaviour , 1975 .

[3]  W. F. Prokasy,et al.  Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research , 1973 .

[4]  P. Ekman.  Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. , 1972 .

[5]  P. Ekman,et al.  Emotion in the Human Face: Guidelines for Research and an Integration of Findings , 1972 .

[6]  M. Seligman.  Phobias and preparedness , 1971 .

[7]  A. Ohman,et al.  The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  A. Ohman,et al.  Phobias and preparedness: phobic versus neutral pictures as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses. , 1975, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  I. Marks.  Fears and phobias , 1989, PSICOLOGIA.

[10]  R. Lockhart,et al.  Comments regarding multiple response phenomena in long interstimulus interval conditioning. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[11]  Effects of instruction on acquisition and extinction of electrodermal responses to fear-relevant stimuli. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[12]  M. Seligman,et al.  Biological boundaries of learning. , 1972 .

[13]  G. Sackett.  Monkeys Reared in Isolation with Pictures as Visual Input: Evidence for an Innate Releasing Mechanism , 1966, Science.

[14]  W. F. Prokasy.  First interval skin conductance responses: conditioned or orienting responses? , 1977, Psychophysiology.

[15]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[16]  P. H. Venables,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Mechanisms, Instrumentation, Recording Techniques, and Quantification of Responses , 1973 .

[17]  V. Hooff.  A comparative approach to the phylogeny of laughter and smiling. , 1972 .

[18]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  Non-verbal Communication , 1973 .

[19]  M. Seligman.  On the generality of the laws of learning , 1970 .

[20]  A. Ohman,et al.  Modeling processes in the acquisition of fears: vicarious electrodermal conditioning to fear-relevant stimuli. , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.