Teledermatology. Current status and future directions.

Teledermatology is becoming an increasingly common means of delivering dermatologic healthcare worldwide and will almost certainly play a greater role in the future. The type of technology used distinguishes the 2 modes of teledermatology consultation. The store and forward technique uses still digital images generated by a digital camera. Consultations of this type are considered asynchronous since the images are obtained, sent, and reviewed at different times. In contrast, real-time interactive consultations are synchronous. Patients and clinicians interact in real-time through an audio-video communication link. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, and studies appear in the literature that assess both technologies. Although diagnostic reliability (precision) assessments for teledermatology are subject to limitations, existing information indicates that both store and forward and real-time interactive technology result in reliable diagnostic outcomes when compared with clinic-based evaluations. Less information regarding diagnostic accuracy is available; however, one evaluation that used store and forward technology found comparable diagnostic accuracy between teledermatology consultations and clinic-based examinations. Currently, little information is available regarding cost effectiveness and patient outcomes. Existing evidence, while inconclusive, suggests that teledermatology may be more costly than traditional clinic-based care, especially when using real-time interactive technology. Teledermatology has been shown to have utility as a triage mechanism for determining the urgency or need for a clinic-based consultation. Overall, patients appear to accept teledermatology and are satisfied with it as a means of obtaining healthcare. Clinicians have also generally reported positive experiences with teledermatology. Future studies that focus on cost effectiveness, patient outcomes, and patient and clinician satisfaction will help further define the potential of teledermatology as a means of dermatologic healthcare delivery.

[1]  P. Canner Monitoring treatment differences in long-term clinical trials. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  K Collins,et al.  General practitioners' perceptions of store-and-forward teledermatology , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[3]  D. Eedy,et al.  Patient satisfaction with realtime teledermatology in Northern Ireland , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  Griffiths,et al.  Comparison of teleconsultations and face‐to‐face consultations: preliminary results of a United Kingdom multicentre teledermatology study , 1998, The British journal of dermatology.

[5]  J. Whited,et al.  Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists' clinic-based and digital image consultations. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  S Gustke,et al.  Reliability of dermatology teleconsultations with the use of teleconferencing technology. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[7]  C M Phillips,et al.  Reliability of telemedicine in evaluating skin tumors. , 1998, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[8]  J. Whited,et al.  A pilot trial of digital imaging in skin cancer , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  B. Zelickson,et al.  Teledermatology in the nursing home. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[10]  D. Eedy,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and clinical management by realtime teledermatology. Results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  D. Eedy,et al.  Patient cost–benefit analysis of teledermatology measured in a randomized control trial , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[12]  M Rademaker,et al.  Patient cost-benefits of realtime teledermatology-a comparison of data from Northern Ireland and New Zealand , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[13]  D. Eedy,et al.  Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  J W Burnett,et al.  Teledermatology and in-person examinations: a comparison of patient and physician perceptions and diagnostic agreement. , 1998, Archives of dermatology.

[15]  J. Dover,et al.  The substitution of digital images for dermatologic physical examination. , 1997, Archives of dermatology.

[16]  H. Lamminen,et al.  A feasibility study of realtime teledermatology in Finland , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[17]  P V Harrison,et al.  A portable digital imaging system in dermatology: Diagnostic and educational applications , 1997, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[18]  Harold White,et al.  The Cornwall dermatology electronic referral and image-transfer project , 1999, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  J. Mckinlay,et al.  Teledermatology in the Highlands of Scotland , 1996, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[20]  J. Lesher,et al.  Telemedicine evaluation of cutaneous diseases: a blinded comparative study. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  D. Eedy,et al.  A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[22]  M Rademaker,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology: results of a preliminary study in New Zealand. , 1997, The New Zealand medical journal.

[23]  D. Eedy,et al.  Preliminary results from the Northern Ireland arms of the UK Multicentre Teledermatology Trial: is clinical management by realtime teledermatology possible? , 1998, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[24]  P. Taylor,et al.  An assessment of the potential effect of a teledermatology system , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  L. Drage,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of low-cost store-and-forward teledermatology consultation. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.