When patents matter: The impact of competition and patent age on the performance contribution of intellectual property rights protection

The question whether patenting impacts patenting firms' subsequent financial performance is important for technology-oriented companies. However, relevant research has led to contradictory results. We strive to overcome this impasse by introducing innovation competition and patent age as moderators of patents' performance contribution into the discourse. Based on a sample of 975 cases from diverse industries, we find strong support for our arguments. In line with our expectations, the results show that the number of patents granted, the degree of patent competition, and the timeliness of a patent contribute positively to financial performance. Moderation analysis nuances our findings by showing that the impact of patent protection on financial performance is stronger when the patent competition is stronger and the patents are younger.

[1]  Christian Vogt,et al.  Rapid prototyping of small size objects , 2000 .

[2]  Petra Andries,et al.  Patenting activities and firm performance : Does firm size matter? , 2013 .

[3]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Daniel E. Vetter,et al.  Replication in strategic management: scientific testing for validity, generalizability, and usefulness , 1998 .

[5]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[6]  Christian Helmers,et al.  Does patenting help high-tech start-ups? , 2011 .

[7]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  I. Cockburn.  Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceuticals: Challenges and Opportunities for Economic Research , 2009 .

[9]  Steven T. Walsh,et al.  Structuring the Technology Entrepreneurship publication landscape: Making sense out of chaos , 2015 .

[10]  Ronald J. Mann,et al.  Patents, Venture Capital, and Software Start-Ups , 2007 .

[11]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation on Firm Performance , 2010 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[13]  David J. Storey,et al.  New technology-based firms in the European union: an introduction , 1998 .

[14]  J. Pennings,et al.  Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: a study on technology‐based ventures , 2001 .

[15]  Terry M. Coalter,et al.  Context, Cognition, and Common Method Variance: Psychometric and Verbal Protocol Evidence , 1996 .

[16]  Matthias Fink,et al.  Cooperation, Trust and Performance – Empirical Results from Three Countries , 2009 .

[17]  David J. Storey,et al.  Public Policy Measures to Support New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union , 1998 .

[18]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[19]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Foreign Patenting in the U.S. as a Technology Indicator : The Case of Norway : Research Policy , 1983 .

[20]  Rainer Harms,et al.  Contextualizing the relationship between self-commitment and performance: Environmental and behavioural uncertainty in (cross-border) alliances of SMEs , 2012 .

[21]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Market Value Revisited: is There Evidence of a Secondtechnological Opportunity Related Factor? , 1988, Economics of Innovation and New Technology.

[22]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2010 .

[23]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Replications and Extensions in Marketing - Rarely Published But Quite Contrary , 1994 .

[24]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Charles W. Hofer,et al.  Measuring Organizational Performance: Metrics for Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Research , 2007 .

[26]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[27]  E. Mansfield.  Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[28]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[29]  H. Cooper,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires , 1983 .

[30]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[31]  Junseok Hwang,et al.  An analysis of the effect of software intellectual property rights on the performance of software firms in South Korea , 2010 .

[32]  H. Ernst.  Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level , 2001 .

[33]  D. Encaoua,et al.  Patent Systems for Encouraging Innovation: Lessons from Economic Analysis , 2006 .

[34]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[35]  Iain M. Cockburn,et al.  Entry and Patenting in the Software Industry , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation , 2000 .

[37]  Piers Steel,et al.  Timing is everything: A meta-analysis of the relationships between organizational performance and innovation , 2010 .

[38]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2007 .