THE EVOLUTION OF THE EVOLVABILITY PROPERTIES OF THE YEAST PRION [PSI+]

Abstract.— Saccharomyces cerevisiae's ability to form the prion [PSI+] may increase the rate of evolvability, defined as the rate of appearance of heritable and potentially adaptive phenotypic variants. The increase in evolvability occurs when the appearance of the prion causes read‐through translation and reveals hidden variation in untranslated regions. Eventually the portion of the phenotypic variation that is adaptive loses its dependence on the revealing mechanism. The mechanism is reversible, so the restoration of normal translation termination conceals the revealed deleterious variation, leaving the yeast without a permanent handicap. Given that the ability to form [PSI+] is known to be fixed and conserved in yeast, we construct a mathematical model to calculate whether this ability is more likely to have become fixed due to chance alone or due to its evolvability characteristics. We find that evolvability is a more likely explanation, as long as environmental change makes partial read‐through of stop codons adaptive at a frequency of at least once every million years.

[1]  H. True,et al.  A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity , 2000, Nature.

[2]  Gary W. Jones,et al.  Amino acid residue 184 of yeast Hsp104 chaperone is critical for prion-curing by guanidine, prion propagation, and thermotolerance , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  S. Kauffman.  Evolving evolvability , 1996, Nature.

[4]  R. Wickner,et al.  [PSI] and [URE3] as yeast prions , 1995, Yeast.

[5]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  Y. Chernoff,et al.  Evidence for a Protein Mutator in Yeast: Role of the Hsp70-Related Chaperone Ssb in Formation, Stability, and Toxicity of the [PSI] Prion , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[7]  M W Feldman,et al.  An evolutionary reduction principle for genetic modifiers. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Counce.  The Strategy of the Genes , 1958, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[9]  I. Eshel.  Clone selection and the evolution of modifying features , 1973 .

[10]  H. P. Treffers,et al.  A Factor (or Mutator Gene) Influencing Mutation Rates in Escherichia Coli. , 1954, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  F. Sherman,et al.  Extrachromosomal psi+ determinant suppresses nonsense mutations in yeast , 1979, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  C. Waddington,et al.  GENETIC ASSIMILATION OF THE BITHORAX PHENOTYPE , 1956 .

[13]  M. Jensen,et al.  Molecular population genetics and evolution of a prion-like protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[14]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  A small reservoir of disabled ORFs in the yeast genome and its implications for the dynamics of proteome evolution. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  C. Waddington,et al.  GENETIC ASSIMILATION OF AN ACQUIRED CHARACTER , 1953 .

[16]  Justin C. Fay,et al.  Positive and negative selection on the human genome. , 2001, Genetics.

[17]  I. Stansfield,et al.  The products of the SUP45 (eRF1) and SUP35 genes interact to mediate translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[18]  Curt Stern,et al.  Selection for Subthreshold Differences and the Origin of Pseudoexogenous Adaptations , 1958, The American Naturalist.

[19]  O. Namy,et al.  Nonsense-mediated decay mutants do not affect programmed -1 frameshifting. , 2000, RNA.

[20]  J. Drake.  A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  L. Partridge,et al.  Natural Selection: Evolving evolvability , 2000, Nature.

[22]  T. Johnson,et al.  The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[23]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing. , 2003, Genetics.

[24]  W. Scharloo,et al.  Canalization: Genetic and Developmental Aspects , 1991 .

[25]  I. Eshel,et al.  Canalization, genetic assimilation and preadaptation. A quantitative genetic model. , 1998, Genetics.

[26]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 1998, Nature.

[27]  Y. Chernoff.  Mutation processes at the protein level: is Lamarck back? , 2001, Mutation research.

[28]  M. Tuite,et al.  Translation termination efficiency can be regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by environmental stress through a prion‐mediated mechanism , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[29]  B. Cox,et al.  Reversion analysis of [psi-] mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1981, Genetical research.

[30]  L. Kisselev,et al.  Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[31]  Adam Eyre-Walker,et al.  Adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila , 2002, Nature.

[32]  Ilan Eshel,et al.  Clone-selection and optimal rates of mutation , 1973, Journal of Applied Probability.

[33]  Y. Chernoff,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of prion‐forming abilities of the yeast Sup35 protein , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[34]  C. Waddington.  The strategy of the genes , 1957 .