Does corporate governance play an important role in BHC performance? Evidence from the U.S.

This study explores the relationship between the operating performance and corporate governance of bank holding companies (BHCs) in the U.S. The modified data envelopment analysis (DEA) is utilized to integrate the five rating indicators of CAMEL (Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earnings, and Liquidity) so as to estimate the BHCs' performance. This study also employs the modified tiered DEA to categorize 68 BHCs into three Tiers. Additionally, the truncated-regression is employed to discuss whether or not the corporate governance would affect the performance of BHCs. The empirical results present the trade-off relationship with CAMEL indicators in the Tier1—Efficient BHCs. Moreover, it has been found that there are negative impacts on BHC's performance from board size, outside directors, the average age of directors and CEO/Chairman duality, while there are positive impacts from the number of committee and Big-4 auditors. The results further prove that corporate governance is important for the operating performance of BHCs.

[1]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[2]  Renée B. Adams,et al.  Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies? , 2003 .

[3]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Subhash C. Ray,et al.  Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data , 1991 .

[5]  Kenneth R. Stanton Trends in relationship lending and factors affecting relationship lending efficiency , 2002 .

[6]  J. Pastor,et al.  Measuring macroeconomic performance in the OECD: A comparison of European and non-European countries , 1995 .

[7]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data transformations in DEA cone ratio envelopment approaches for monitoring bank performances , 1997 .

[8]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Joseph C. Paradi,et al.  Commercial branch performance evaluation and results communication in a Canadian bank--a DEA application , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Daniel Porath,et al.  Accounting for Distress in Bank Mergers , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Leadership Structure: Separating the CEO and Chairman of the Board , 1997 .

[13]  James F. Nielsen,et al.  Board Independence and Compensation Policies in Large Bank Holding Companies , 2000 .

[14]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[15]  M. Fung,et al.  Scale economies, X-efficiency, and convergence of productivity among bank holding companies , 2006 .

[16]  Minwir Al-Shammari,et al.  Modeling the operating efficiency of banks: a nonparametric methodology , 1998 .

[17]  Obeua S. Persons,et al.  Using Financial Information to Differentiate Failed vs. Surviving Finance Companies in Thailand: An Implication for Emerging Economies , 1999 .

[18]  Eleuterio Vallelado,et al.  Corporate Governance in Banking: The Role of the Board of Directors , 2008 .

[19]  Richard Grabowski,et al.  Organizational forms in banking: An empirical investigation of cost efficiency , 1993 .

[20]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs , 2006 .

[21]  Joe Zhu,et al.  A slack-based measure of efficiency in context-dependent data envelopment analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Morten Bennedsen,et al.  The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms , 2008 .

[23]  George Halkos,et al.  Efficiency Measures of the Greek Banking Sector: A Non-Parametric Approach for the Period 1997-1999 , 2001 .

[24]  The impact of mean reversion of bank profitability on post-merger performance in the banking industry , 2006 .

[25]  Jonathan M. Williams,et al.  Financial liberalisation, crisis, and restructuring: A comparative study of bank performance and bank governance in South East Asia , 2005 .

[26]  Joseph P. H. Fan,et al.  Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia , 2001 .

[27]  Ellen Engel,et al.  Financial Accounting Information, Organizational Complexity and Corporate Governance Systems , 2003 .

[28]  M. Walker,et al.  UK Executive Compensation Practices: new economy vs old economy , 2003 .

[29]  S. Miller,et al.  Productivity growth in large US commercial banks: The initial post-deregulation experience , 2001 .

[30]  R. G. Dyson,et al.  Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to the Banking Industry , 2006 .

[32]  George Halkos,et al.  Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with the use of financial ratios: a data envelopment analysis approach , 2004 .

[33]  Ameeta Jain,et al.  Corporate Governance Failure and its Impact on National Australia Bank's Performance , 2011 .

[34]  Isaac Otchere,et al.  Intra-industry effects of bank privatization: A clinical analysis of the privatization of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia , 2003 .

[35]  L. Goldberg,et al.  Evaluating the Nordea experiment: Evidence from market and accounting data☆ , 2007 .

[36]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  The Non-Correlation between Board Independence And Long-Term Firm Performance , 1998 .

[37]  A. Shleifer,et al.  A Survey of Corporate Governance , 1996 .

[38]  M. Hall,et al.  The Impact of Macroeconomic and Regulatory Factors on Bank Efficiency: A Non-Parametric Analysis of Hong Kong's Banking System , 2005 .

[39]  J. Kenton Zumwalt,et al.  The Changing Relationship Between CAMEL Ratings and Bank Soundness during the Indonesian Banking Crisis , 2002 .

[40]  Paul W. Wilson,et al.  Consolidation in US banking: which banks engage in mergers? , 2001 .

[41]  Comparing Market and Supervisory Assessments of Bank Performance: Who Knows What When? , 1998 .

[42]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Water Supply Services in Japan with RAM: a Range-adjusted Measure of Inefficiency , 1998 .

[43]  C. Kao,et al.  Predicting bank performance with financial forecasts: A case of Taiwan commercial banks , 2004 .

[44]  L. Seiford,et al.  Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .

[45]  L. Seiford,et al.  Profitability and Marketability of the Top 55 U.S. Commercial Banks , 1999 .

[46]  The Contribution of On‐Site Examination Ratings to an Empirical Model of Bank Failures , 1999 .

[47]  E. Fama,et al.  Agency Problems and Residual Claims , 1983 .

[48]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[49]  Bruce Hollingsworth,et al.  Use of ratios in data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[50]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[51]  C. Lovell,et al.  Measuring the macroeconomic performance of the Taiwanese economy , 1995 .

[52]  R. Grabowski,et al.  Technical, Scale, and Allocative Efficiencies in U.S. Banking: An Empirical Investigation , 1990 .

[53]  D. Yermack Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors , 1996 .

[54]  Robert R. Bliss,et al.  Market Discipline in the Governance of U.S. Bank Holding Companies: Monitoring vs. Influencing , 2002 .

[55]  Stijn Claessens,et al.  Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings , 2002 .

[56]  Benjamin B. M. Shao,et al.  Technical efficiency analysis of information technology investments: a two-stage empirical investigation , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[57]  David W. Blackwell,et al.  Accounting information and internal performance evaluation Evidence from Texas banks , 1994 .

[58]  K. Stiroh How did bank holding companies prosper in the 1990s , 2000 .

[59]  R. R. Russell,et al.  Measures of technical efficiency , 1985 .

[60]  R. Billings,et al.  Determinants of Banking System Fragility: A Case Study of Mexico , 1997 .

[61]  F. López-Iturriaga,et al.  Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness , 2005 .

[62]  S. Prowse CORPORATE CONTROL IN COMMERCIAL BANKS , 1997 .

[63]  Hassan Tehranian,et al.  The Impact of Institutional Ownership on Corporate Operating Performance , 2003 .

[64]  Hristos Doucouliagos,et al.  Directors' Remuneration and Performance in Australian Banking , 2007 .

[65]  Jesús T. Pastor,et al.  An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[66]  Jan-Egbert Sturm,et al.  Foreign bank entry, deregulation and bank efficiency: Lessons from the Australian experience , 2004 .

[67]  Connie X. Mao,et al.  Diversification and the Cost of Debt of Bank Holding Companies , 2007 .

[68]  A. Saunders,et al.  The Role of Bank Advisors in Mergers and Acquisitions , 2000 .

[69]  Olena Havrylchyk Efficiency of the Polish Banking Industry: Foreign Versus Domestic Banks , 2006 .

[70]  Elyas Elyasiani,et al.  Geographic Diversification, Bank Holding Company Value, and Risk , 2008 .

[71]  P. S. Rose The Distribution of Outcomes from Corporate Mergers: Evidence from Commercial Bank Acquisition Strategies , 1995 .