Biopsy Assessment of Oncologic Control 3 Years Following Primary Partial Gland Cryoablation: A Prospective Cohort Study of Men With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer

Purpose: We evaluated 3-year oncologic outcomes following primary partial gland cryoablation. Materials and Methods: Men with unilateral intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing primary partial gland cryoablation since March 2017 enrolled in a prospective outcome registry. The postablation protocol for all men included surveillance prostate biopsy at 2 years postablation and reflex prostate biopsy for cases with high suspicion of recurrence (eg, progressive rise in PSA). Recurrence of clinically significant prostate cancer was defined as any Gleason grade group ≥2 disease on postablation biopsy. Freedom from failure represented no whole gland salvage treatment, metastatic prostate cancer, or prostate cancer mortality. Freedom from recurrence and freedom from failure were characterized using nonparametric maximum likelihood estimators. Results: A total of 132 men had at least 24 months of follow-up data. Biopsies identified clinically significant prostate cancer in 12 men. At 36 months, model-estimated rates of freedom from recurrence of in-field, out-of-field, and overall clinically significant cancer were 97% (95% CI: 92-100), 87% (95% CI: 80-94), and 86% (95% CI: 78-93), respectively. The model-estimated proportion with freedom from failure at 36 months was 97% (95% CI: 93-100). Conclusions: The low in-field cancer detection rate at 3 years indicates successful ablation of localized cancers. Conversely, our observed out-of-field detection rate highlights the need for continued surveillance following partial gland cryoablation. Many of these recurrences exhibited very low volume of clinically significant disease below the detection threshold of multiparametric MRI, suggesting a limited role for multiparametric MRI in detecting clinically significant recurrences at 2 years. These findings emphasize the need for long-term surveillance and identification of predictors of clinically significant prostate cancer recurrences to guide biopsy timing.

[1]  A. Sahai,et al.  MP80-16 BLACK PATIENTS HAVE WORSE CONTINENCE OUTCOMES AT 12 MONTHS FOLLOWING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY , 2023, Journal of Urology.

[2]  J. Oxley,et al.  Fifteen-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. , 2023, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Thompson,et al.  PACE-A: An international phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to surgery for localised prostate cancer (LPCa)—Primary endpoint analysis. , 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Eastham,et al.  Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part II: Principles of Active Surveillance, Principles of Surgery, and Follow-Up , 2022, The Journal of urology.

[5]  T. Polascik,et al.  Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Individualized Partial Gland Cryoablation of the Prostate: A Single Institution Experience. , 2021, Journal of endourology.

[6]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2020, European urology.

[7]  H. Lepor,et al.  Early oncological control following partial gland cryo-ablation: a prospective experience specifying reflex MRI guided biopsy of the ablation zone , 2020, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[8]  C. Ogden,et al.  Focal therapy compared to radical prostatectomy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a propensity score-matched study , 2020, Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases.

[9]  A. Sidana,et al.  Standardized Nomenclature and Surveillance Methodologies After Focal Therapy and Partial Gland Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Consensus. , 2020, European urology.

[10]  H. Lepor,et al.  Oncological control following partial gland ablation for intermediate-risk prostate cancer. , 2020, Urologic oncology.

[11]  D. Margolis,et al.  Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. , 2019, European urology.

[12]  I. Gill,et al.  Hemigland Cryoablation of Localized Low, Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes at 5 Years , 2019, Journal of Urology.

[13]  H. Ahmed,et al.  Early-Medium-Term Outcomes of Primary Focal Cryotherapy to Treat Nonmetastatic Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer from a Prospective Multicentre Registry. , 2019, European urology.

[14]  Elton Llukani,et al.  Two-year Outcomes Following Focal Laser Ablation of Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2018, European urology oncology.

[15]  M. Parmar,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study , 2017, The Lancet.

[16]  L. Egevad,et al.  A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score. , 2016, European urology.

[17]  Fang-Ming Deng,et al.  Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. , 2016, European urology.

[18]  T. D. de Reijke,et al.  Standardization of definitions in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project , 2016, World Journal of Urology.

[19]  Pamela A Shaw,et al.  Exact and Asymptotic Weighted Logrank Tests for Interval Censored Data: The interval R package. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[20]  B. Turnbull The Empirical Distribution Function with Arbitrarily Grouped, Censored, and Truncated Data , 1976 .

[21]  S. Eggener Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2018, Reviews in urology.

[22]  E. Barret,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Partial Gland Ablation and Radical Prostatectomy to Treat Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer: Oncologic and Functional Outcomes , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[23]  Mark Emberton,et al.  New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review. , 2017, European urology.

[24]  Elton Llukani,et al.  The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Oncological Control Among Candidates for Focal Ablation of Prostate Cancer. , 2017 .