SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ICT INTERPRETED IN A NATURAL SCIENCE CONTEXT

Sustainable development (SD) is a political concept with a strong normative component. In this article, we show which implications follow from this normative component if it is interpreted in a natural science context. We conclude that from a natural science point of view, a far-reaching dematerialization of consumption is a necessary condition for SD. We further conclude that information and communication technologies can only support SD if they are applied as enablers of dematerialized (less material-intensive) types of consumption. Macro-level data on consumption shows, however, that average material flows per capita are still increasing. In this problematical situation, we see a need for framework conditions that provide incentives for dematerialization and specialized research on the psychosocial conditions on the basis of which consumption patterns could evolve towards a more dematerialized economy.

[1]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Socioecological Transitions and Global Change , 2007 .

[2]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Analysis of energy footprints associated with recycling of glass and plastic—case studies for industrial ecology , 2004 .

[3]  F. Schmidt‐bleek.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch , 1994 .

[4]  N. Carpentier,et al.  Towards a Sustainable Information Society , 2006 .

[5]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  The future impact of ICT on environmental sustainability , 2004 .

[6]  Friedrich Schmidt-Bleek,et al.  Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? : MIPS-das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften , 1994 .

[7]  Heinz Böni,et al.  One laptop per child, local refurbishment or overseas donations? Sustainability assessment of computer supply scenarios for schools in Colombia. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Diane Coyle,et al.  The weightless world: strategies for managing the digital economy , 1999 .

[9]  Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,et al.  Organisation for economic cooperation and development , 1998 .

[10]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[11]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  End-of-life impacts of pervasive computing , 2005, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[12]  K. Meyer-Abich.  Nachhaltigkeit - ein kulturelles, bisher aber chancenloses Wirtschaftsziel* , 2001 .

[13]  Dagmar Schröter,et al.  Socioecological transitions and global change: trajectories of social metabolism and land use , 2009 .

[14]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Dematerialization: the potential of ICT and services , 2001 .

[15]  R. Solow.  We’d better watch out , 1987 .

[16]  F. Renaud,et al.  A review of the environmental fate and effects of hazardous substances released from electrical and electronic equipments during recycling: Examples from China and India , 2010 .

[17]  Patrick Wäger,et al.  Smart labels in municipal solid waste — a case for the Precautionary Principle? , 2005 .

[18]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[19]  Ralf Isenmann.  Sustainable Information Society , 2007, Encyclopedia of Information Ethics and Security.

[20]  D. Maclean,et al.  Internet Governance and Sustainable Development Towards a Common Agenda , 2007 .

[21]  P. Brunner,et al.  Metabolism of the Anthroposphere , 1991 .

[22]  J. Last.  Our common future. , 1987, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[23]  C. Fuchs.  The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability , 2008 .

[24]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Electronic waste—an emerging risk? , 2005 .

[25]  Isaac L. Auerbach.  International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) , 1963, Elektron. Rechenanlagen.

[26]  Lorenz M. Hilty,et al.  Information technology and sustainability : essays on the relationship between ICT and sustainable development , 2008 .