Efficacy of High-Sensitivity Troponin T in Identifying Very-Low-Risk Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

Importance Physicians need information on how to use the first available high-sensitivity troponin (hsTnT) assay in the United States to identify patients at very low risk for 30-day adverse cardiac events (ACE). Objective To determine whether a negative hsTnT assay at 0 and 3 hours following emergency department presentation could identify patients at less than 1% risk of a 30-day ACE. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective, observational study at 15 emergency departments in the United States between 2011 and 2015 that included individuals 21 years and older, presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute coronary syndrome. Of 1690 eligible individuals, 15 (no cardiac troponin T measurement) and 320 (missing a 0-hour or 3-hour sample) were excluded from the analyses. Exposures Serial hsTnT measurements (fifth-generation Roche Elecsys hsTnT assay). Main Outcomes and Measures Serial blood samples from each patient were collected after emergency department presentation (once identified as a potential patient with acute coronary syndrome) and 3 hours, 6 to 9 hours, and 12 to 24 hours later. Adverse cardiac events were defined as myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, or death. The upper reference level for the hsTnT assay, defined as the 99th percentile, was established as 19 ng/L in a separate healthy US cohort. Patients were considered ruled out for acute myocardial infarction if their hsTnT level at 0 hours and 3 hours was less than the upper reference level. Gold standard diagnoses were determined by a clinical end point committee. Evaluation of assay clinical performance for acute myocardial infarction rule-out was prespecified; the hypothesis regarding 30-day ACE was formulated after data collection. Results In 1301 healthy volunteers (50.4% women; median age, 48 years), the upper reference level was 19 ng/L. In 1600 patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (48.4% women; median age, 55 years), a single hsTnTlevel less than 6 ng/L at baseline had a negative predictive value for AMI of 99.4%. In 974 patients (77.1%) with both 0-hour and 3-hour hsTnT levels of 19 ng/L or less, the negative predictive value for 30-day ACE was 99.3% (95% CI, 99.1-99.6). Using sex-specific cutpoints, C statistics for women (0.952) and men (0.962) were similar for acute myocardial infarction. Conclusions and Relevance A single hsTnT level less than 6 ng/L was associated with a markedly decreased risk of AMI, while serial levels at 19 ng/L or less identified patients at less than 1% risk of 30-day ACE.

[1]  Joanna M. Young,et al.  Rapid Rule-out of Acute Myocardial Infarction With a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement Below the Limit of Detection: A Collaborative Meta-analysis. , 2017, Annals of internal medicine.

[2]  Emogene S Aldridge,et al.  Emergency department ‘undercrowding’ is associated with decreased waiting times , 2016, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[3]  A. Jaffe,et al.  IFCC educational materials on selected analytical and clinical applications of high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. , 2015, Clinical biochemistry.

[4]  P. Collinson,et al.  High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Morwenna Rogers,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of single baseline measurement of Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive assay for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in emergency department: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  B. Lindahl,et al.  Decision limits and the reporting of cardiac troponin: Meeting the needs of both the cardiologist and the ED physician , 2015, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[7]  D. Newby,et al.  High sensitivity cardiac troponin in patients with chest pain , 2013, BMJ.

[8]  E. Hess,et al.  What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the Emergency Department?: a clinical survey. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[9]  C. Reid,et al.  2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Multicenter analytical evaluation of a high-sensitivity troponin T assay. , 2011, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[12]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. , 2010, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  A. Chang,et al.  The association between emergency department crowding and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chest pain. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[14]  Robert H Christenson,et al.  National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: clinical characteristics and utilization of biochemical markers in acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  J. Kline,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of quantitative pretest probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain units. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[16]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome in a university hospital emergency department: an observational study , 2002, BMC emergency medicine.

[17]  A. Evans,et al.  Triage of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: a comparative study of physicians' decisions. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  G. Freas,et al.  Medicolegal aspects of acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[19]  A. Akıllı,et al.  Cardiac Troponin T in Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1998 .

[20]  C. Heeschen,et al.  Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Mark,et al.  Differences in the Treatment of Myocardial Infarction Between the United States and Canada: A Survey of Physicians in the GUSTO Trial , 1995, Medical care.

[22]  O. Nguyen,et al.  Use of cardiac biomarker testing in the emergency department. , 2015, JAMA internal medicine.

[23]  M. Sebbane,et al.  Comparison of conventional and high-sensitivity troponin in patients with chest pain: a collaborative meta-analysis. , 2015, American heart journal.

[24]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[25]  J. Alpert,et al.  The third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2013 .

[26]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. , 2012, Circulation.

[27]  Steven L Bernstein,et al.  The effect of emergency department crowding on clinically oriented outcomes. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[28]  Eugenia Yu,et al.  A clinical prediction rule for early discharge of patients with chest pain. , 2006, Annals of emergency medicine.

[29]  Luis A. Escobar,et al.  Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners , 1991 .