Coupled dynamics of deepwater structures – issues and challenges

ABSTRACT Offshore systems consisting of floaters linked to line structures such as risers and mooring lines are favoured for deepwater applications. The dynamic coupling analysis of a floater together with the line structures has been the subject of several studies in recent years. Powerful numerical tools have been developed implementing full-fledged time-domain approaches as well as more efficient frequency-domain approaches for the analysis of deepwater systems. The present article provides a brief overview of coupled analysis techniques employing both time-domain and frequency-domain approaches, focusing on the basic modelling issues and challenges. It is worth formulating compact but sufficiently accurate dynamic models of line structures. The consequence of truncation errors of numerical integration schemes in long-term time-domain simulations needs to be studied. There is a need to standardise the statistical linearisation approach applied to dynamic response which spreads over a very wide frequency range. Verification of the nonlinear drag force model in the Morison equation through basic computational fluid dynamics studies may be undertaken.

[1]  Robert B. Gordon,et al.  Global Performance of Floating Production Systems , 2002 .

[2]  Moo-Hyun Kim,et al.  Coupled-dynamic analysis of floating structures with polyester mooring lines , 2008 .

[3]  Robin S. Langley,et al.  The linearisation of three dimensional drag force in random seas with current , 1984 .

[4]  Ying Min Low,et al.  Understanding the Dynamic Coupling Effects in Deep Water Floating Structures Using a Simplified Model , 2008 .

[5]  Weoncheol Koo,et al.  Freely floating-body simulation by a 2D fully nonlinear numerical wave tank , 2004 .

[6]  P. Spanos,et al.  Random vibration and statistical linearization , 1990 .

[7]  Jun Zou,et al.  Deepwater Nonlinear Coupled Analysis Tool , 2000 .

[8]  W. Cummins THE IMPULSE RESPONSE FUNCTION AND SHIP MOTIONS , 2010 .

[9]  Ying Min Low,et al.  Extreme response analysis of floating structures using coupled frequency domain analysis , 2011 .

[10]  John Grue,et al.  Wave drift damping of floating bodies in slow yaw motion , 1996 .

[11]  Arne Nestegård,et al.  Coupled Analysis Strategies For Deepwater Spar Platforms , 2001 .

[12]  M. F. van Sluijs,et al.  The Influence Of Waves On The Low-Frequency Hydrodynamic Coefficients Of Moored Vessels , 1979 .

[13]  James Hamilton,et al.  Three-dimensional Fourier analysis of drag force for compliant offshore structures , 1980 .

[14]  D. L. Garrett,et al.  Coupled analysis of floating production systems , 2003 .

[15]  Moo-Hyun Kim,et al.  Mathieu instability of a spar platform with mooring and risers , 2004 .

[16]  John Halkyard,et al.  Truss Spar Vortex Induced Motions: Benchmarking of CFD and Model Tests , 2006 .

[17]  Ying Min Low,et al.  A hybrid time/frequency domain approach for efficient coupled analysis of vessel/mooring/riser dynamics , 2008 .

[18]  Subrata K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Offshore Structures , 1987 .

[19]  Thomas E. Schellin,et al.  Low-frequency damping of a moored semisubmersible obtained from simulated extinction tests and mean wave drift forces , 1989 .

[20]  Jianmin Yang,et al.  Coupling Effects for Cell-Truss Spar Platform: Comparison of Frequency- and Time- Domain Analyses with Model Tests , 2008 .

[21]  V. G. Idichandy,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study of Coupled Dynamic Response of a Mini Tension Leg Platform , 2004 .

[22]  Bin Teng,et al.  Coupled dynamic analysis for wave interaction with a truss spar and its mooring line/riser system in time domain , 2012 .

[23]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Coupled dynamic analysis of a mini TLP: Comparison with measurements , 2006 .

[24]  C. P. Vendhan,et al.  Analysis of Second Order Steady Hydrodynamic Forces On Floating Bodies In Regular Waves By Finite Element Method , 1999 .

[25]  D. L. Garrett,et al.  Mooring- and Riser-Induced Damping in Fatigue Seastates , 2002 .

[26]  Robin S. Langley,et al.  Time and frequency domain coupled analysis of deepwater floating production systems , 2006 .

[27]  B Molin SECOND-ORDER HYDRODYNAMICS APPLIED TO MOORED STRUCTURES - A STATE-OF-THE-ART SURVEY , 1994 .

[28]  Qingwei Ma,et al.  QALE‐FEM for numerical modelling of non‐linear interaction between 3D moored floating bodies and steep waves , 2009 .

[29]  G. Wu,et al.  Finite element simulation of fully non‐linear interaction between vertical cylinders and steep waves. Part 1: methodology and numerical procedure , 2001 .

[30]  Erling Katla,et al.  Coupling Effects for a Deepwater Spar , 2000 .

[31]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[32]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Sea loads on ships and offshore structures , 1990 .

[33]  Mei,et al.  Theory and applications of ocean surface waves. Part 2: nonlinear aspects , 2005 .

[34]  J.E.W. Wichers Wave-Current Interaction Effects On Moored Tankers In High Seas , 1988 .

[35]  J. A. Pinkster,et al.  Mean and low frequency wave drifting forces on floating structures , 1979 .

[36]  Ola Oritsland,et al.  Challenges in Deep Water Experiments: Hybrid Approach , 2002 .

[37]  Kjell Larsen,et al.  Coupled analysis of floater motion and mooring dynamics for a turret-moored ship , 1998 .

[38]  S. L. Anderson,et al.  STATISTICAL LINEARIZATION OF VELOCITY-SQUARED DRAG FORCES , 1986 .

[39]  E. Fontaine,et al.  Coupled Dynamic Response of Moored FPSO With Risers , 2001 .

[40]  J. N. Newman Wave-drift damping of floating bodies , 1993 .

[41]  Joseph Penzien,et al.  Nondeterministic Analysis of Offshore Structures , 1970 .

[42]  Q. Ma,et al.  QALE-FEM for Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Interaction between 3 D Moored Floating Bodies and Steep Waves , 2019 .

[43]  V. G. Idichandy,et al.  Coupled dynamics of SeaStar mini tension leg platform , 2003 .

[44]  S C Wu,et al.  RANDOM RESPONSE OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES TO WAVE AND CURRENT FORCES , 1975 .

[45]  José Augusto Penteado Aranha,et al.  Second-order horizontal steady forces and moment on a floating body with small forward speed , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.