Observing response processes with eye tracking in international large-scale assessments: evidence from the OECD PIAAC assessment

This paper reports on a pilot study that used eye tracking techniques to make detailed observations of item response processes in the OECD Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). The lab-based study also recorded physiological responses using measures of pupil diameter and electrodermal activity. The study tested 14 adult respondents as they individually completed the PIAAC computer-based assessment. The eye tracking observations help to fill an ‘explanatory gap’ by providing data on variation in item response processes that are not captured by other sources of process data such as think aloud protocols or computer-generated log files. The data on fixations and saccades provided detailed information on test item response strategies, enabling profiling of respondent engagement and response processes associated with successful performance. Much of that activity does not include the use of the keyboard and mouse, and involves ‘off-screen’ use of pen and paper (and calculator) that are not captured by assessment log-files. In conclusion, this paper points toward an important application of eye tracking in large-scale assessments. This includes insights into response processes in new domains such as adaptive problem-solving that aim to identify individuals’ ability to select and combine resources from the digital and physical environment.

[1]  A. Baucal,et al.  Teachers’ reflection on PISA items and why they are so hard for students in Serbia , 2018 .

[2]  B. Maddox Talk and Gesture as Process Data , 2017 .

[3]  Trish L. Varao-Sousa,et al.  Re-Reading After Mind Wandering , 2017, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[4]  Johannes Naumann,et al.  More is not Always Better: The Relation between Item Response and Item Response Time in Raven's Matrices , 2015 .

[5]  Heiko Rölke,et al.  The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. , 2014 .

[6]  Fiona G. Phelps,et al.  Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[7]  B. Zumbo,et al.  Response Processes in the Context of Validity: Setting the Stage , 2017 .

[8]  K. Rayner,et al.  Emerging issues in developmental eye-tracking research: Insights from the workshop in Hannover, October 2013 , 2015 .

[9]  Jacqueline P. Leighton,et al.  Cognitive Interviewing and Think Aloud Methods , 2017 .

[10]  Paul E. Newton,et al.  Macro- and Micro-Validation: Beyond the "Five Sources" Framework for Classifying Validation Evidence and Analysis. , 2016 .

[11]  Mario Dalmaso,et al.  Re-encountering individuals who previously engaged in joint gaze modulates subsequent gaze cueing. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Frederick J. Brigham,et al.  An exploration of the use of eye‐gaze tracking to study problem‐solving on standardized science assessments , 2006 .

[13]  D. Pepper,et al.  Think aloud: using cognitive interviewing to validate the PISA assessment of student self-efficacy in mathematics , 2018 .

[14]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy , 2016 .

[15]  Armando Barreto,et al.  Comparison of the use of pupil diameter and galvanic skin response signals for affective assessment of computer users. , 2012, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[16]  Bian Wu,et al.  An Eye Tracking Study of High- and Low-Performing Students in Solving Interactive and Analytical Problems , 2017, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[17]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[19]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  Advanced, Analytic, Automated (AAA) Measurement of Engagement During Learning , 2017, Educational psychologist.

[21]  Silvia Wen-Yu Lee,et al.  A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012 , 2013 .

[22]  A review , 2019 .

[23]  Sidney K. D'Mello,et al.  Automatic gaze-based user-independent detection of mind wandering during computerized reading , 2016, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[24]  Daniel A. Gajewski,et al.  Minimal use of working memory in a scene comparison task , 2005 .

[25]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  Three Generations of DIF Analyses: Considering Where It Has Been, Where It Is Now, and Where It Is Going , 2007 .

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[27]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  All good readers are the same, but every low-skilled reader is different: an eye-tracking study using PISA data , 2018 .

[28]  Bruno D. Zumbo,et al.  What Counts as Evidence: A Review of Validity Studies in Educational and Psychological Measurement , 2014 .

[29]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Eyes wide shut: implied social presence, eye tracking and attention , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Yue Jia,et al.  Collecting, Analyzing, and Interpreting Response Time, Eye-Tracking, and Log Data , 2017 .

[31]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Validation of Score Meaning Using Examinee Response Processes for the Next Generation of Assessments , 2017 .

[32]  Alan Kennedy,et al.  Book Review: Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  T. Pansell,et al.  Screening for Dyslexia Using Eye Tracking during Reading , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  Christof Körner,et al.  The Relation between Reading Skills and Eye Movement Patterns in Adolescent Readers: Evidence from a Regular Orthography , 2016, PloS one.

[35]  H. Wimmer,et al.  A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers , 2010, Cognition.

[36]  Gabriele B. Durrant,et al.  Editorial: The use of paradata in social survey research , 2013 .

[37]  B. Zumbo,et al.  Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research , 2017 .

[38]  B. Zumbo,et al.  Observing Testing Situations: Validation as Jazz , 2017 .

[39]  F. Ferreira,et al.  Executive Function and Intelligence in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Individual Differences Investigation , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[40]  Per Henning Uppstad,et al.  Eye-tracking as a tool in process-oriented reading test validation , 2011 .

[41]  Eric J. Paulson,et al.  Does the Degrees of Reading Power Assessment Reflect the Reading Process? An Eye-Movement Examination. , 2002 .