A Boolean map theory of visual attention.

UNLABELLED A theory is presented that attempts to answer two questions. What visual contents can an observer consciously access at one moment? ANSWER only one feature value (e.g., green) per dimension, but those feature values can be associated (as a group) with multiple spatially precise locations (comprising a single labeled Boolean map). How can an observer voluntarily select what to access? ANSWER in one of two ways: (a) by selecting one feature value in one dimension (e.g., selecting the color red) or (b) by iteratively combining the output of (a) with a preexisting Boolean map via the Boolean operations of intersection and union. Boolean map theory offers a unified interpretation of a wide variety of visual attention phenomena usually treated in separate literatures. In so doing, it also illuminates the neglected phenomena of attention to structure.

[1]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Spatial Resolution of Visual Attention , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Farah,et al.  Does visual attention select objects or locations? , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  James F. Juola,et al.  Relative Effectiveness of Central, Peripheral, and Abrupt-onset Cues in Visual Attention , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  H. Barlow,et al.  The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays , 1979, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  C. Scialfa,et al.  Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  H. Pashler,et al.  Close binding of identity and location in visual feature perception. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  H Pashler,et al.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[13]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Michael D'Zmura,et al.  Color in visual search , 1991, Vision Research.

[15]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial frequency uncertainty effects in the detection of sinusoidal gratings , 1981, Vision Research.

[16]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Competition and sharing of processing resources in visual discrimination. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  M M Smyth,et al.  Interference in immediate spatial memory , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Ronald A. Rensink Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness , 1996, Nature.

[21]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[23]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  J. Driver,et al.  Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction , 2001, Cognition.

[26]  M. Smyth Interference with Rehearsal in Spatial Working Memory in the Absence of Eye Movements , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[27]  H Pashler,et al.  Familiarity and visual change detection , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J. Robson,et al.  Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[29]  Ronald A. Rensink The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[30]  M. Chun,et al.  Organization of visual short-term memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  J E Hoffman,et al.  A two-stage model of visual search , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  D. Alanallport Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions , 1971 .

[33]  J. Findlay Saccade Target Selection During Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[34]  G. Boynton Attention and visual perception , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[35]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Symmetry detection and visual attention: a “binary-map” hypothesis , 2002, Vision Research.

[36]  George Sperling,et al.  The spatial distribution of visual attention , 2004, Vision Research.

[37]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  A Dissociation Between Attention and Selection , 2001, Psychological science.

[39]  Kang Chen,et al.  Visual Attention and Eye Movements , 2008 .

[40]  Michael Kubovy,et al.  Should We Resist the Seductiveness of the Space:Time::Vision:Audition Analogy? , 1988 .

[41]  S. Yantis Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  On the Failure to Detect Changes in Scenes Across Brief Interruptions , 2000 .

[44]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  P. Quinlan Visual feature integration theory: past, present, and future. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[48]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Auditory and visual objects , 2001, Cognition.

[50]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[52]  S. Yantis Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[53]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  H. Pashler,et al.  Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: Dominant role of uniqueness , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[56]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach. , 1996, Psychological review.

[57]  G. Claxton Cognitive psychology: New directions , 1980 .

[58]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Grouping by Proximity and Multistability in Dot Lattices: A Quantitative Gestalt Theory , 1995 .

[59]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[60]  H. Egeth Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination , 1966 .

[61]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Send Correspondence to , 2005 .

[62]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[63]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[64]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Visual Search Does Not Remain Efficient When Executive Working Memory Is Working , 2004, Psychological science.

[66]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[67]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[68]  A. Treisman,et al.  Representation of statistical properties , 2003, Vision Research.

[69]  S. Yantis,et al.  Common neural substrates for the control and effects of visual attention and perceptual bistability. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[70]  Stephen Wallace,et al.  Figure and Ground , 1982 .

[71]  M. Kubovy,et al.  On the Lawfulness of Grouping by Proximity , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[72]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[74]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[76]  S. Kosslyn Image and mind , 1982 .

[77]  D E Williams,et al.  Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[78]  G. Baylis,et al.  Movement and visual attention: the spotlight metaphor breaks down. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[79]  Paul Maruff,et al.  Behavioral Goals Constrain the Selection of Visual Information , 1999 .

[80]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[81]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[82]  C. J. Downing Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[84]  H. Egeth,et al.  How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[85]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). , 1993 .

[86]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[87]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[88]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[89]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[90]  G. Sperling,et al.  Is there feature-based attentional selection in visual search? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[91]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[92]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[93]  Z. Pylyshyn Some puzzling findings in multiple object tracking: I. Tracking without keeping track of object identities , 2004 .

[94]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[95]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Disambiguating Ambiguous Figures by Selective Attention , 1985 .

[96]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[97]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[98]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Feature binding in object-file representations of multiple moving items. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[99]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Visual perception : essential readings , 2000 .

[100]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[101]  A F Kramer,et al.  Object-based attentional selection--grouped arrays or spatially invariant representations?: comment on vecera and Farah (1994). , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[102]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Affine structure from motion. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[103]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[104]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[105]  Harold Pashler,et al.  No role for colour in symmetry perception , 1999, Nature.

[106]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[107]  G. Zelinsky Using Eye Saccades to Assess the Selectivity of Search Movements , 1996, Vision Research.

[108]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[109]  Z. Pylyshyn The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model , 1989, Cognition.

[110]  S. Palmer,et al.  Orientation and symmetry: effects of multiple, rotational, and near symmetries. , 1978, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[111]  W. Cowan,et al.  Visual search for colour targets that are or are not linearly separable from distractors , 1996, Vision Research.

[112]  P Kramer,et al.  Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[113]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Visual processing capacity and attentional control. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[114]  Steven Franconeri,et al.  The relationship between property-encoding and object-based attention: Evidence from multiple object tracking , 1999 .

[115]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[116]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[117]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[118]  Anastasia V Flevaris,et al.  Exogenous spatial attention influences figure-ground assignment. , 2010, Psychological science.

[119]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[120]  K. Cave,et al.  Spatial Attention in Visual Search for Features and Feature Conjunctions , 1995 .

[121]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[122]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[123]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[124]  J. Jonides,et al.  Rehearsal in spatial working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[125]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[126]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[127]  J. Juola,et al.  Voluntary allocation versus automatic capture of visual attention , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[128]  R. M. Boynton,et al.  Independence of memory for categorically different colors and shapes , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[129]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  The efficiency of feature-based subitization and counting. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[130]  Nobuo Kawabata,et al.  Visual fixation points and depth perception , 1978, Vision Research.

[131]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[132]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[133]  Anne-Catherine Bachoud-Lévi,et al.  Object memory effects on figure assignment: conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient , 2000, Vision Research.

[134]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[135]  G. Woodman,et al.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[136]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[137]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[138]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking Multiple Items Through Occlusion: Clues to Visual Objecthood , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[139]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[140]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[141]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[142]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.