Pilot personality and crew coordination: implications for training and selection.

The performance of pilots can be construed as a product of skill, attitude, and personality factors. Although a great deal of effort within the aviation community has been focused on ensuring technical expertise, and new efforts highlight attitudes associated with crew coordination, personality factors have been relatively unexplored. Further, it is argued that past failures to find linkages between personality and performance were due to a combination of inadequate statistical modeling, premature performance evaluation, and/or the reliance on data gathered in contrived as opposed to realistic situations. The goal of the research presented in this article is to isolate subgroups of pilots along performance-related personality dimensions and to document limits on the impact of crew coordination training between the groups. Two samples of military pilots were surveyed in the context of training in crew coordination. Three different profiles were identified through cluster analysis of personality scales. These clusters replicated across samples and predicted attitude change following training in crew coordination.

[1]  Sells Sb Development of a personality test battery for psychiatric screening of flying personnel. , 1955 .

[2]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Cockpit Management Attitudes , 1984, Human factors.

[3]  R L Helmreich,et al.  The honeymoon effect in job performance: temporal increases in the predictive power of achievement motivation. , 1986, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses , 1979 .

[5]  W. S. Hunter,et al.  Psychology in the war. , 1946, The American psychologist.

[6]  B. Kanki,et al.  Communication indices of crew coordination. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[7]  S J Zyzanski,et al.  Progress Toward Validation of a Computer‐Scored Test for the Type A Coronary‐Prone Behavior Pattern , 1971, Psychosomatic medicine.

[8]  T R Chidester Trends and individual differences in response to short-haul fight operations. , 1990, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[9]  H. Foushee,et al.  Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance , 1984 .

[10]  R. L. Thorndike Who belongs in the family? , 1953 .

[11]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[12]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Making it without Losing it , 1988, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  R. Helmreich,et al.  Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents , 1978 .