Influence of Superheated Vapour in Organic Rankine Cycles with Working Fluid R123 Utilizing Low-Temperature Geothermal Resources

An organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system with R123 working fluid has been utilised for generating electricity from low-temperature geothermal resources. The degree of superheated vapour warrants attention to be studied further. This is because the degree of superheated vapour is the last point to absorb heat energy from geothermal heat sources and influence the amount of expansion power produced by the expander. Therefore, achieving high ORC system efficiency requires a parameter of superheated vapour degree. This paper presents an experimental study on a binary cycle, applying R123 as the working fluid, to investigate the effect of variation in superheated vapour degree on the ORC efficiency. Geothermal heat sources were simulated with conduction oil as an external heat source to provide input heat to the ORC system. The temperature high inlet (TH in) evaporator was designed to remain at 120 °C during the experiment, while mass flow rate was adjusted to make superheated vapour variations, namely set at 278, 280, 282, 284, and 286 K. Furthermore, the effect was observed on heat transfer inlet, pinch, heat transfer coefficient, expander work output, isentropic efficiency, expander shaft power, power generation, thermal efficiency, and ORC efficiency. The experimental results showed that the mass flow rate nearly remained unchanged at different degrees of superheated vapour. The ranges of heat transfer inlet, pinch temperature, and heat transfer coefficient were 25.34–27.89 kJ/kg, 9.35–4.08 °C, 200.62–232.54 W/m2·K, respectively. In conclusion, ORC system efficiency can be triggered by various parameters, including the temperature on the exit side of the evaporator. The superheated vapour of R123 working fluid to higher temperatures has caused a decrease in ORC system efficiency due to the decrease in heat transfer inlets, although theoretically, the work total increased. Further investigation has found that the magnitude of the mass flow rate affects the behaviour of the components of the ORC system.

[1]  Jinliang Xu,et al.  Operation of an organic Rankine cycle dependent on pumping flow rates and expander torques , 2015 .

[2]  Muhammad Usman,et al.  Thermo-economic comparison of air-cooled and cooling tower based Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with R245fa and R1233zde as candidate working fluids for different geographical climate conditions , 2017 .

[3]  R. Bertani Geothermal power generation in the world 2010–2014 update report , 2016 .

[4]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems , 2013 .

[5]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Transient Simulation of Geothermal Combined Heat and Power Generation for a Resilient Energetic and Economic Evaluation , 2019, Energies.

[6]  B. Laenen,et al.  Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles , 2019, Applied Energy.

[7]  E. Michaelides Future directions and cycles for electricity production from geothermal resources , 2016 .

[8]  Tao Guo,et al.  Selection of working fluids for a novel low-temperature geothermally-powered ORC based cogeneration system , 2011 .

[9]  Ying Chen,et al.  Mathematical modelling and optimization of the liquid separation condenser used in organic Rankine cycle , 2017 .

[10]  Christoph Wieland,et al.  Experimental study of an ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and analysis of R1233zd-E as a drop-in replacement for R245fa for low temperature heat utilization , 2016 .

[11]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Testing and modeling a scroll expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle , 2009 .

[12]  Wei Wang,et al.  Experimental study and theoretical analysis of a Roto-Jet pump in small scale organic Rankine cycles , 2016 .

[13]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures , 2015 .

[14]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Charge-sensitive modelling of organic Rankine cycle power systems for off-design performance simulation , 2018 .

[15]  Maurizio Vaccaro,et al.  Numerical simulation of geothermal reservoirs for the sustainable design of energy plants: A review , 2014 .

[16]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Thermoeconomic Analysis of Hybrid Power Plant Concepts for Geothermal Combined Heat and Power Generation , 2014 .

[17]  Saili Li,et al.  Preliminary design and off-design performance analysis of an Organic Rankine Cycle for geothermal sources , 2015 .

[18]  Jinliang Xu,et al.  Operation and performance of a low temperature organic Rankine cycle , 2015 .

[19]  Dominik Meinel,et al.  Innovative CHP concept for ORC and its benefit compared to conventional concepts , 2016 .

[20]  Wei Yu,et al.  Dynamic modelling and validation of a commercial scale geothermal organic rankine cycle power plant , 2016 .

[21]  Susan Krumdieck,et al.  Lifetime design strategy for binary geothermal plants considering degradation of geothermal resource productivity , 2017 .

[22]  Jia-ling Zhu,et al.  Experimental investigation on Al2O3-R123 nanorefrigerant heat transfer performances in evaporator based on organic Rankine cycle , 2018, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[23]  Yu Xiaohui,et al.  Thermo-economic analysis of a novel power generation system integrating a natural gas expansion plant with a geothermal ORC in Tianjin, China , 2018, Energy.

[24]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants , 2010 .

[25]  Alessandro Franco,et al.  Optimal design of binary cycle power plants for water-dominated, medium-temperature geothermal fields , 2009 .

[26]  Andrea Toffolo,et al.  An Organic Rankine Cycle off-design model for the search of the optimal control strategy , 2013 .

[27]  Ehsan Houshfar,et al.  Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of waste heat recovery from Tehran's waste-to-energy plant integrated with an ORC unit , 2018, Energy.

[28]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Parametric and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery system based on thermoelectric generator and organic rankine cycle utilizing R123 , 2012 .

[29]  Jian Li,et al.  Thermo-economic performance evaluation of emerging liquid-separated condensation method in single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle systems , 2019 .

[30]  Christos N. Markides,et al.  Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques , 2019, Applied Energy.

[31]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Geothermal power plants: Evolution and performance assessments , 2015 .

[32]  Chun-wei Gu,et al.  Parametric design and off-design analysis of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system , 2016 .

[33]  Taufik,et al.  Comparison of the Utilization of 110 °C and 120 °C Heat Sources in a Geothermal Energy System Using Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) with R245fa, R123, and Mixed-Ratio Fluids as Working Fluids , 2019, Processes.

[34]  V. Zare,et al.  A comparative exergoeconomic analysis of different ORC configurations for binary geothermal power plants , 2015 .

[35]  Tong Seop Kim,et al.  Off-design performance analysis of organic Rankine cycle using real operation data from a heat source plant , 2017 .

[36]  Ayad Al Jubori,et al.  Three dimensional optimization of small-scale axial turbine for low temperature heat source driven organic Rankine cycle , 2017 .

[37]  Gequn Shu,et al.  Experimental comparison of R123 and R245fa as working fluids for waste heat recovery from heavy-duty diesel engine , 2016 .

[39]  B. Lei,et al.  Numerical optimization of intake and exhaust structure and experimental verification on single-screw expander for small-scale ORC applications , 2020 .

[40]  Yi Li,et al.  The energy flow method for modeling and optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems , 2019, Energy Conversion and Management.

[41]  A. Roskilly,et al.  Chemisorption power generation driven by low grade heat – Theoretical analysis and comparison with pumpless ORC , 2017 .

[42]  Long Shao,et al.  Experimental study of an organic Rankine cycle system with radial inflow turbine and R123 , 2017 .

[43]  Seyed Amin Bagherzadeh,et al.  Compression ratio energy and exergy analysis of a developed Brayton-based power cycle employing CAES and ORC , 2019, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[44]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Development and experimental study on a single screw expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle , 2016 .

[45]  Ben-Ran Fu,et al.  Performance of a 250 kW Organic Rankine Cycle System for Off-Design Heat Source Conditions , 2014 .

[46]  B. Lei,et al.  Internal volume ratio optimization and performance analysis for single-screw expander in small-scale middle temperature ORC system , 2019, Energy.

[47]  Luona Yang,et al.  Thermo-economic analysis and optimization selection of ORC system configurations for low temperature binary-cycle geothermal plant , 2017 .

[48]  Naiping Gao,et al.  Experimental testing and numerical simulation of scroll expander in a small scale organic Rankine cycle system , 2015 .

[49]  Ramiro Gustavo Ramirez Camacho,et al.  Performance analysis of radial-inflow turbine of ORC: New combined approach of preliminary design and 3D CFD study , 2020 .

[50]  A. Romagnoli,et al.  Analysis and comparison of dynamic behavior of heat exchangers for direct evaporation in ORC waste heat recovery applications from fluctuating sources , 2018 .

[51]  Maoqing Li,et al.  Construction and preliminary test of a low-temperature regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) using R123 , 2013 .