Embedding social innovation process into the institutional context: Voids or supports

Social innovation (SI) is a complex construct that is lacking a unifying paradigm in social sciences. However, together with the recent attention towards social change, it requires a theoretical perspective that analyzes the construct within its institutional context (IC) without forgetting that the term is socially constructed. This current study aims to contribute to the literature by exploring and describing the inter-linkages between institutional voids (IVs)/institutional supports (ISs) perspectives and SI process by positioning the actor as the catalyzer and the change-agent. The study tries to explore if existing IVs or supports, which are embedded in social-welfare, commercial or public-sector logics, stimulate SI and result in the development of these ideas. The research setting is deliberately selected as a developing country that deals with plenty of IVs and suffers from the lack of ISs; a research setting that exhibits a high degree of heterogeneity and a low institutionalization level. The results indicate that IVs stimulate SIs mostly at the incremental and institutional level where IS is inadequate. The heterogeneity of IVs and a low degree of institutionalization result in the heterogeneity of actions undertaken for SI. Implications for practitioners and scholars are recommended at the end of the paper.

[1]  A. Novy,et al.  Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social Innovation and the Dialectical Relationship of State and Civil Society , 2005 .

[2]  C. Dell’Era,et al.  Managing social innovation in for-profit organizations: the case of Intesa Sanpaolo , 2015 .

[3]  John B. Kervin,et al.  Methods for Business Research , 1992 .

[4]  J. Siegel Is there a better commitment mechanism than cross-listings for emerging-economy firms? Evidence from Mexico , 2009 .

[5]  Y. Chandra,et al.  Mining Social Entrepreneurship Strategies Using Topic Modeling , 2016, PloS one.

[6]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Including the stakeholders: The business case , 1998 .

[7]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[8]  P. Dorfman,et al.  Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches , 2006 .

[9]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and Institutional Theory , 1997 .

[10]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[11]  J. Pfeffer Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[12]  D. Wheeler,et al.  The stakeholder corporation : a blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value , 1997 .

[13]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity by the State , 1990 .

[14]  Diane-Gabrielle Tremblay,et al.  Social economy-based local initiatives and social innovation: a Montreal case study , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[15]  B. Leca,et al.  How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[16]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Profiling Existing Research on Social Innovation in the Public Sector , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[17]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems , 1999 .

[18]  A. Nicholls Fair Trade: Towards an Economics of Virtue , 2010 .

[19]  Alex Nicholls,et al.  The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre–Paradigmatic Field , 2010 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[21]  B. Elango,et al.  Building capabilities for international operations through networks: a study of Indian firms , 2007 .

[22]  V. K. Narayanan,et al.  The Relevance of the Institutional Underpinnings of Porter's Five Forces Framework to Emerging Economies: An Epistemological Analysis , 2005 .

[23]  G. Mulgan,et al.  The open book of social innovation , 2010 .

[24]  Richard T. Marcy Breaking mental models as a form of creative destruction: The role of leader cognition in radical social innovations , 2015 .

[25]  Timo Hämäläinen Social Innovation, Structural Adjustment and Economic Performance , 2007 .

[26]  T. Khanna,et al.  The Future of Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Long Run Evidence from Chile , 1998 .

[27]  G. Cajaiba-Santana Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework , 2014 .

[28]  A. Ghobadian,et al.  Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship , 2015 .

[29]  E. Ostrom Social capital: a fad or a fundamental concept?* , 2005 .

[30]  W. Sewell A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Michel Lander,et al.  Structure! Agency! (And Other Quarrels): A Meta-Analysis Of Institutional Theories Of Organization , 2009 .

[32]  Craig V. VanSandt,et al.  Enabling the Original Intent: Catalysts for Social Entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[33]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don't Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here , 2010 .

[34]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The Architecture of Markets , 2015 .

[35]  Sea-Jin Chang,et al.  Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transactions , 2000 .

[36]  Ernesto Tavoletti,et al.  Business Model Innovation in Emerging Economies: Leveraging Institutional Voids , 2015 .

[37]  T. Khanna,et al.  Emerging Giants: Building World-Class Companies in Developing Countries , 2006 .

[38]  Dominic Chalmers,et al.  Social innovation: An exploration of the barriers faced by innovating organizations in the social economy , 2013 .

[39]  J. Mair,et al.  Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh , 2009 .

[40]  T. Khanna,et al.  Strategies that fit emerging markets. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[41]  Daniel Riffe,et al.  A Content Analysis of Content Analyses: Twenty-Five Years of Journalism Quarterly , 1997 .

[42]  J. Battilana,et al.  Organizing for Society: A Typology of Social Entrepreneuring Models , 2012 .

[43]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[44]  Anne-Claire Pache,et al.  Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics , 2013 .

[45]  G. Mulgan,et al.  Social Innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated , 2007 .

[46]  Yijia Jing,et al.  Managed Social Innovation: The Case of Government‐Sponsored Venture Philanthropy in Shanghai (政府管理下的社会创新:以上海市政府发起的公益创投为例)1 , 2012 .

[47]  K. Bailey Methods of Social Research , 1978 .

[48]  F. Moulaert Social Innovation: Institutionally Embedded, Territorially (Re)Produced , 2016 .

[49]  Behlül Üsdiken,et al.  Uniformity and Diversity in Turkish Business Groups: Effects of Scale and Time of Founding , 2001 .

[50]  Duygu Seçkin Halaç,et al.  Which One Triggers the Other? Technological or Social Innovation , 2013 .

[51]  Lisa Daniel,et al.  Understanding social innovation: a provisional framework , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[52]  Frank Pot,et al.  Social innovation, the new challenge for Europe , 2008 .

[53]  Danny Miller,et al.  Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets , 2009 .

[54]  Elisabeth S. Clemens and,et al.  POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change , 1999 .

[55]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Cases of Social Innovation: Lessons From Two Innovations in the 20th Century , 2003 .

[56]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[57]  Imran Chowdhury,et al.  Social Entrepreneurs as Institutionally Embedded Entrepreneurs: Toward a New Model of Social Entrepreneurship Education , 2012 .

[58]  Tomasz Mickiewicz,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Social Capital, and Institutions: Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship across Nations , 2013 .

[59]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[60]  J. Miner Organizational Behavior 3: Historical Origins, Theoretical Foundations, and the Future , 2006 .

[61]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .

[62]  New Players on Crowded Playing Fields: The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Innovation in Germany , 2014, Social Policy and Society.

[63]  M. Ventresca,et al.  Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh: How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids , 2012 .

[64]  Yipeng Liu High‐tech ventures' innovation and influences of institutional voids: A comparative study of two high‐tech parks in China , 2011 .

[65]  Marshall W. Van Alstyne,et al.  Estrategias para mercados bilaterales , 2006 .

[66]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution , 1997 .

[67]  Fiona Lettice,et al.  The social innovation process: themes, challenges and implications for practice , 2010, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[68]  D. Tremblay,et al.  Social Entrepreneurs, Local Initiatives and Social Economy: Foundations for a Socially Innovative Strategy to Fight against Poverty and Exclusion , 2009 .

[69]  A. Kolk,et al.  Cross-Sector Collaboration, Institutional Gaps, and Fragility: The Role of Social Innovation Partnerships in a Conflict-Affected Region , 2015 .

[70]  M. Mumford Social Innovation: Ten Cases From Benjamin Franklin , 2002 .

[71]  C. Slappendel Perspectives on Innovation in Organizations , 1996 .

[72]  C. Stride,et al.  Institutions and social entrepreneurship: The role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations , 2014, Journal of International Business Studies.

[73]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  Institutional Theory and Entrepreneurship: Where Are We Now and Where Do We Need to Move in the Future? , 2010 .

[74]  Emre Kongar 21. yüzyılda Türkiye : 2000'li yıllarda Türkiye'nin toplumsal yapısı , 2000 .

[75]  T. Khanna,et al.  Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets , 1997 .

[76]  Geoff Mulgan,et al.  The Process of Social Innovation , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[77]  A. Carsrud,et al.  Social Ventures from a Resource–Based Perspective: An Exploratory Study Assessing Global Ashoka Fellows , 2010 .

[78]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[79]  Simon Ville,et al.  Social innovation: buzz word or enduring term? , 2009 .

[80]  E. Berman,et al.  Municipal Support for Social Entrepreneurship , 2006 .

[81]  P. Evans Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy , 1996 .

[82]  F. Westley,et al.  The Social Finance and Social Innovation Nexus 1 , 2012 .

[83]  Sheila M. Puffer,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The Impact of Formal Institutional Voids , 2010 .

[84]  S. Bacq,et al.  The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria , 2011 .

[85]  William Drayton,et al.  Everyone a Changemaker: Social Entrepreneurship's Ultimate Goal , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[86]  R. Huggins,et al.  Social capital and innovation: A comparative analysis of regional policies , 2016 .