Re‐evaluation of ammonium phosphatides (E 442) as a food additive

The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS) provides a scientific opinion re-evaluating the safety of ammonium phosphatides (E 442) as a food additive. The Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) allocated an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 30 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day in 1978 and 1974, respectively. The Panel noted that after oral administration of E 442 ([32P]YN), a proportion of the radioactivity passed through the gastrointestinal tract and was excreted via faeces and also a quantity of radioactivity was absorbed rapidly after dosing as indicated by its presence in the skeletal tissue and liver. Acute oral toxicity of ammonium phosphatides is low and no adverse effects were observed in a 90-day rats study. The Panel considered that ammonium phosphatides did not raise concern for genotoxicity. The Panel identified no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) of 8,500 and 3,000 mg/kg bw per day, the highest doses tested, from dietary chronic and carcinogenicity studies with ammonium phosphatides in mice and rats, respectively. No effects on reproduction and development were observed in a dietary two-generation reproductive toxicity study at the only dose tested of 3,000 mg/kg bw per day, and in addition, no maternal or developmental effects were recognised in a dietary prenatal developmental toxicity study up to a dose of 4,774 mg/kg bw per day. Based on the available toxicological database, the Panel concluded that there is no reason to revise the current ADI for ammonium phosphatides of 30 mg/kg bw per day. Considering that the ADI is not exceeded in any population group, the Panel also concluded that the use of ammonium phosphatides (E 442) as a food additive, at the permitted or reported use and use levels, would not be of safety concern.

[1]  Heather M. Wallace,et al.  Erucic acid in feed and food , 2016 .

[2]  A. Géloën,et al.  Dietary emulsifiers from milk and soybean differently impact adiposity and inflammation in association with modulation of colonic goblet cells in high-fat fed mice. , 2016, Molecular nutrition & food research.

[3]  Patrice D Cani,et al.  Keeping gut lining at bay: impact of emulsifiers , 2015, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[4]  Omry Koren,et al.  Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome , 2015, Nature.

[5]  J. Rhodes,et al.  Mucosal Barrier, Bacteria and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Possibilities for Therapy , 2014, Digestive Diseases.

[6]  M. Hornef,et al.  The impact of perinatal immune development on mucosal homeostasis and chronic inflammation , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[7]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Structural analysis and predictive value of the rodent in vivo micronucleus assay results. , 2010, Mutagenesis.

[8]  V. Loening-Baucke,et al.  Mucosal flora in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis - an overview. , 2009, Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society.

[9]  V. Loening-Baucke,et al.  Bacterial Overgrowth and Inflammation of Small Intestine After Carboxymethylcellulose Ingestion in Genetically Susceptible Mice , 2009, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[10]  L. Foster,et al.  Analytical Methods for Food Additives , 2004 .

[11]  A. Dieffenbacher,et al.  Analytical techniques in food emulsifiers , 1978, Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society.

[12]  I. Gaunt,et al.  Studies on the metabolic fate of 32P-labelled Emulsifier YN in the mouse, guinea-pig and ferret. , 1975, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[13]  I. Gaunt,et al.  Long-term feeding and reproduction studies on emulsifier YN in rats. , 1973, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[14]  J. Folch,et al.  A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. , 1957, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  J. Weitkamp,et al.  Maternal influences on fetal microbial colonization and immune development , 2015, Pediatric Research.

[16]  Paul Tobback,et al.  European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-general Directorate C -scientific Opinions C2 -management of Scientific Committee; Scientific Co-operation and Networks Guidance on Submissions for Food Additive Evaluations by the Scientific Committee on Food Contents Introductory Remarks , 2022 .

[17]  Olga Tcheremenskaia,et al.  The new ISSMIC database on in vivo micronucleus and its role in assessing genotoxicity testing strategies. , 2012, Mutagenesis.

[18]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Guidance of EFSA: Use of the EFSA Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database in exposure assessment , 2011 .

[19]  R. Hartel,et al.  Emulsifiers in Confectionery , 2008 .

[20]  A. Damant,et al.  18 – E442: Ammonium phosphatides , 2004 .

[21]  P. Brandt,et al.  Evaluation of certain food additives. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Fifty-ninth report of the JECFA, nitrate and nitrite , 2002 .

[22]  J. Jane,et al.  Quantitative method for the survey of starch phosphate derivatives and starch phospholipids by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , 1996 .

[23]  K. Butterworth,et al.  Long-term toxicity study of emulsifier YN in the mouse. , 1977, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[24]  I. Gaunt,et al.  Short-term toxicity study of emulsifier YN in rats. , 1967, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[25]  G. Feuer Metabolic fate of 32P-labelled emulsifier YN in rats. , 1967, Food and cosmetics toxicology.