Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options—a review

Causal maps are widely employed in problem-structuring interventions. They permit a rich representation of ideas, through the modelling of complex chains of argument as networks. The last stage of a problem-structuring intervention is often to identify and agree to a set of potential strategic options. In some circumstances the preferred direction may emerge naturally from a process of negotiation; in others further, more-or-less formal, analysis to evaluate the options and to understand their impacts on the goals could be helpful. Such analysis may help to bring closure to the process. The main aim of this paper is to review systematically the approaches for evaluating options following from the use of a causal map for problem structuring; some directly using the map structure, others working with concepts extracted from, or an external model derived from, the map. Following a proposed taxonomy, each approach is presented, and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

[1]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[2]  C Leake,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgement (2nd Edn) , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Jati K. Sengupta,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management , 1985 .

[4]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[5]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis for performance measurement in a radiotherapy department , 2004 .

[6]  S French,et al.  Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding , 1996 .

[7]  S. French Value‐focused thinking: A path to creative decision making, Keeney, R. L., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992, ISBN 0‐674‐93197‐1 , 1993 .

[8]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[9]  Valerie Belton,et al.  COPE — ing with V·I·S·A — Integrated Support from Problem Structuring through to Alternative Evaluation , 1997 .

[10]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis for performance management: a case study , 2004 .

[12]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Supporting factoring transactions in Brazil using reasoning maps: a language-based DSS for evaluating accounts receivable , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Research and Practice in Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 2000 .

[15]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Decision science or decision-aid science? , 1993 .

[16]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[17]  O. Larichev Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques , 1992 .

[18]  Brahim Chaib-draa,et al.  Causal Maps: Theory, Implementation, and Practical Applications in Multiagent Environments , 2002, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[19]  J. Bryson,et al.  Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results , 2004 .

[20]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives , 1993 .

[21]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Problem structuring methods in action , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  L. Ensslin,et al.  Constructing and Implementing a DSS to Help Evaluate Perceived Risk of Accounts Receivable , 2000 .

[24]  Valerie Belton,et al.  A Framework for Group Decision Using a MCDA Model: Sharing, Aggregating or Comparing Individual Information? , 1997 .

[25]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[26]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Inference in cognitive maps , 1994 .

[27]  C. Eden ON THE NATURE OF COGNITIVE MAPS , 1992 .

[28]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Quantitative models for performance measurement system , 2000 .

[29]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[30]  Colin Eden,et al.  Cognitive mapping and problem structuring for system dynamics model building , 1994 .

[31]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[32]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[33]  Leonardo Ensslin,et al.  Decision Support Systems in action: Integrated application in a multicriteria decision aid process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Cognitive maps and fuzzy implications , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  M. Quaddus,et al.  Group Decision Support Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for Causal Reasoning , 2004 .

[36]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[37]  C. Eden,et al.  The analysis of cause maps , 1992 .

[38]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Adding value to performance measurement by using system dynamics and multicriteria analysis , 2002 .

[39]  A. Huff Mapping Strategic Knowledge , 2002 .