Learning by accident? Reductions in the risk of unplanned outages in U.S. nuclear power plants after Three Mile Island

This study uses a Cox proportional hazards model to analyze changes in the risk of unplanned outages in U.S. nuclear power plants after the Three Mile Island (TMI) accident. The unplanned outage hazard is related to safety by the fact that most such outages begin with unplanned reactor scrams. These place extreme stresses on plant equipment, increasing the risk of serious accident. The estimates indicate that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-led efforts to improve nuclear plant safety after TMI were followed by substantial reductions in the risk of unplanned outages.

[1]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[2]  N. Breslow.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data. , 1974, Biometrics.

[3]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  The Effects of Learning by Doing on Nuclear Plant Operating Reliability , 1979 .

[4]  David A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Chi-squared goodness-of-fit tests for the proportional hazards regression model , 1980 .

[5]  A. Tsiatis.  A Large Sample Study of Cox's Regression Model , 1981 .

[6]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[7]  J. Burridge.  Some unimodality properties of likelihoods derived from grouped data , 1982 .

[8]  Per Kragh Andersen,et al.  Testing Goodness of Fit of Cox's Regression and Life Model , 1982 .

[9]  Robert G. Easterling.  Statistical analysis of U.S. power plant capacity factors through 1979 , 1982 .

[10]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[11]  Mounir Mesbah,et al.  A Global Goodness‐Of‐Fit Statistic for the Proportional Hazards Model , 1985 .

[12]  Steve Thomas.  The realities of nuclear power , 1988 .

[13]  Alfred A. Marcus,et al.  Implementing Externally Induced Innovations: A Comparison of Rule-Bound and Autonomous Approaches , 1988 .

[14]  Jeffrey A. Dubin,et al.  Risk and reactor safety systems adoption , 1989 .

[15]  Steve Thomas,et al.  The Realities of Nuclear Power: International Economic and Regulatory Experience , 1989 .

[16]  Jonathan S. Feinstein,et al.  The Safety Regulation of U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: Violations, Inspections, and Abnormal Occurrences , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Geoffrey Rothwell.  Utilization and service: Decomposing nuclear reactor capacity factors☆ , 1990 .

[18]  B. L. Lipford,et al.  Three Mile Island revisited , 1991 .

[19]  T. Baer.  Safety at a glance; Upgrading the displays in a nuclear plant control room , 1992 .

[20]  Joel L. Horowitz,et al.  A Generalized Moments Specification Test of the Proportional Hazards Model , 1992 .

[21]  John L. Solow,et al.  Nuclear power plant performance: the post Three Mile Island era , 1992 .

[22]  S. E. Hunt.  Book reviewNuclear power, technical and institutional options for the future: National academic press, Washington D.C. 1992 , 1993 .

[23]  R. Lester,et al.  The Effect of Industrial Structure on Learning by Doing in Nuclear Power Plant Operation , 1993 .

[24]  R. Sturm,et al.  Nuclear power in Eastern Europe: Learning or forgetting curves? , 1993 .

[25]  J. W. Cletcher.  Reactor shutdown experience , 1995 .

[26]  Geoffrey Rothwell,et al.  Optimal Response to a Shift in Regulatory Regime: The Case of the US Nuclear Power Industry , 1995 .

[27]  Geoffrey Rothwell,et al.  Measuring standardization: An application to the American and French nuclear power industries , 1996 .

[28]  Geoffrey Rothwell,et al.  Organizational Structure and Expected Output at Nuclear Power Plants , 1996 .