Assessing the Value of Virtual Worlds for Post- Secondary Instructors: A Survey of Innovators, Early Adopters and the Early Majority in Second Life

The purpose of this study was to assess the value of Second Life among post-secondary instructors with experience using Second Life as an educational tool. Using Everett Rogers's diffusion of innovations theory, survey respondents (N = 162), were divided into three adopter categories: innovators, early adopters and the early majority. Respondents were from 15 countries and 25 academic disciplines, indicating the considerable potential this innovation has to be adopted across many different borders and in many areas of academe. Nearly 94% of respondents said they plan to use Second Life again as an educational tool. However, no significant differences were found in instructors' levels of satisfaction with Second Life as an educational tool or their perceived effect on student learning across adopter categories. On the other hand, instructors who conducted class fully in Second Life were significantly more satisfied than those who used Second Life as only a small supplement to a real-world class. Overall, personal interest factors, rather than interpersonal communication factors, most influenced respondents' decision to adopt Second Life as an educational tool. In light of these findings, theoretical implications are discussed and practical suggestions are provided.

[1]  P. Sutherland.  Diffusion of Courses with World Wide Web Features: Perceptions of Journalism and Mass Communication Program Administrators , 2002 .

[2]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations (5. ed.) , 2003 .

[3]  Cynthia Calongne,et al.  Blended Realities: A Virtual Tour of Education in Second Life , 2007 .

[4]  Judi Repman,et al.  Effective Use of CMC Tools in Interactive Online Learning , 2005 .

[5]  Maria Riccio,et al.  Distance learning of electronic measurements by means of measurement set-up models , 2008 .

[6]  C. Cheal.  Second Life: Hype or Hyperlearning? , 2007 .

[7]  Willian Geoghegan,et al.  Whatever Happened to Instructional Technology , 1994 .

[8]  Brenda Bannan-Ritland.  Computer-Mediated Communication, eLearning, and Interactivity: A Review of the Research. , 2002 .

[9]  Andrea L. Foster.  Professor Avatar: In the Digital Universe of Second Life, Classroom Instruction Also Takes on a New Personality. , 2007 .

[10]  Marcus Childress,et al.  Using Massively Multiplayer Online Role‐Playing Games for Online Learning , 2006 .

[11]  J. Brown,et al.  Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 , 2008 .

[12]  Jack M. Maness.  Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries , 2006, Webology.

[13]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[14]  Nancy A. Jennings,et al.  Virtual or Virtually U: Educational Institutions in Second Life , 2007 .

[15]  B. Dawn Medlin,et al.  Factors Influencing Accounting Faculty Members' Decision to Adopt Technology in the Classroom. , 2007 .

[16]  Paul Martin Lester,et al.  Analog vs. Digital Instruction and Learning: Teaching Within First and Second Life Environments , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  E. Stacey,et al.  Adopting Web‐Based Learning and Teaching: A case study in higher education , 2007 .

[18]  A. Kelton.  Second Life: Reaching into the Virtual World for Real-World Learning , 2007 .