Building Shared Understandings in Introductory Physics Tutorials Through Risk, Repair, Conflict & Comedy

Title of Document: BUILDING SHARED UNDERSTANDINGS IN INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS TUTORIALS THROUGH RISK, REPAIR, CONFLICT &

[1]  M. Newman.  Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. , 1996 .

[4]  William F. Brewer,et al.  Scientists' Responses to Anomalous Data: Evidence from Psychology, History, and Philosophy of Science , 1994, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[5]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[6]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen.  Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed , 1991 .

[7]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Coherence, Truth, and the Development of Scientific Knowledge* , 2007, Philosophy of Science.

[8]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  E. Goffman.  On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. , 1955, Psychiatry.

[10]  E. Schegloff.  Third Turn Repair , 1997 .

[11]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas in Interaction: Examples from a Medical Examination/Interview , 1987 .

[12]  E. Redish,et al.  Reinventing college physics for biologists: Explicating an epistemological curriculum , 2008, 0807.4436.

[13]  Leema K. Berland,et al.  Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .

[14]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Common sense concepts about motion , 1985 .

[15]  David Hammer,et al.  Students’ Framings and Their Participation in Scientific Argumentation , 2012 .

[16]  Dahl Östen.  Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (advances in discourse processes, 20) , 1990 .

[17]  H Goldstein,et al.  Word recognition in a foreign language: A study of speech perception , 1983, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[19]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Stance in spoken and written university registers , 2006 .

[20]  R. Duschl.  Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[21]  Rachel E. Scherr.  Video analysis for insight and coding: Examples from tutorials in introductory physics , 2009 .

[22]  Sam Kirkham,et al.  Personal style and epistemic stance in classroom discussion , 2011 .

[23]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[24]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes , 1978 .

[25]  Alvin M. Cotlar,et al.  'What Do You Care What Other People Think?': Further Adventures of a Curious Character , 1989 .

[26]  J. Dewey,et al.  How We Think , 2009 .

[27]  Elise Kärkkäinen,et al.  Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity , 2006 .

[28]  Teppo Varttala,et al.  Remarks on the Communicative Functions of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine. , 1999 .

[29]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Physics Education Research: Modeling student thinking , 2004 .

[30]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities , 2007 .

[31]  J. Baggott.  The Meaning of Quantum Theory: A Guide for Students of Chemistry and Physics , 1992 .

[32]  Elise Kärkkäinen,et al.  Epistemic Stance in English Conversation: A Description of Its Interactional Functions, with a Focus on I Think , 2003 .

[33]  L. Darden.  Reasoning in Biological Discoveries: Essays on Mechanisms, Interfield Relations, and Anomaly Resolution , 2006 .

[34]  R. Duschl,et al.  "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .

[35]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[36]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Inquiry, Activity and Epistemic Practice , 2008 .

[37]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Epistemological resources and framing: a cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students' epistemologies , 2010 .

[38]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[39]  J. K. Murnighan,et al.  The Emergence of Norms in Competitive Decision-Making Groups. , 1985 .

[40]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[41]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument , 2007 .

[42]  Barbara Johnstone.  Stance, Style, and the Linguistic Individual , 2009 .

[43]  Richard Phillips Feynman,et al.  Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman/What Do You Care What Other People Think? , 1989 .

[44]  Steven Weinberg,et al.  Dreams of a Final Theory , 1993 .

[45]  D. Kuhn.  Thinking as Argument , 1992 .

[46]  Rachel E. Scherr,et al.  The Dynamics of Students' Behaviors and Reasoning during Collaborative Physics Tutorial Sessions , 2007, 0803.0323.

[47]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[48]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Interaction and grammar: “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists , 1996 .

[49]  Alvin I. Goldman,et al.  Group Knowledge Versus Group Rationality: Two Approaches to Social Epistemology , 2004, Episteme.

[50]  David Hammer,et al.  Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students’ Abilities , 2008 .

[51]  L. Whitt.  Theory Pursuit: Between Discovery and Acceptance , 1990, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[52]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[53]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[54]  J. Tudge.  When collaboration leads to regression-Some negative consequences of socio-cognitive conflict , 1989 .

[55]  Adam Jaworski,et al.  The Discourse Reader , 2006 .

[56]  Rebecca Clift,et al.  Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction , 2006 .

[57]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[58]  Diane Horton,et al.  Repairing conversational misunderstandings and non-understandings , 1994, Speech Communication.

[59]  J. Gottman,et al.  The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: a longitudinal view of five types of couples. , 1993, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[60]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Framing in Discourse , 1993 .

[61]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[62]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Conclusion , 2010 .

[63]  Johanna Nichols,et al.  Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology , 1986 .

[64]  Raija Markkanen,et al.  Hedging Research in Pragmatics: A Bibliographical Research Guide to Hedging , 1997 .

[65]  Emanuel A. Schegloff,et al.  Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[66]  Kevin Dunbar,et al.  Concept Discovery in a Scientific Domain , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[68]  B. Sharma.  Conceding in disagreements during small group interactions in academic writing class , 2012 .

[69]  L. Pondy.  Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. , 1967 .

[70]  R. Penrose,et al.  A theory of everything? , 2005, Nature.

[71]  Josef C. Schrock,et al.  Discourse Markers in Spontaneous Speech: Oh What a Difference an Oh Makes , 1999 .

[72]  J. Bonito,et al.  Speakers' Footing in a Collaborative Writing Task: A Resource for Addressing Disagreement While Avoiding Conflict , 2002 .

[73]  Steven Pinker,et al.  The logic of indirect speech , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[74]  Noriko Hara,et al.  An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[75]  P. Machamer,et al.  Thinking about Mechanisms , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[76]  D. Schiffrin,et al.  The Handbook of Discourse Analysis , 2001 .

[77]  David Hammer,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs in Introductory Physics , 1994 .

[78]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[79]  Peter S. Shaffer,et al.  Tutorials in Introductory Physics , 1998 .

[80]  Stacy Olitsky,et al.  Coherence, contradiction, and the development of school science identities , 2010 .

[81]  R. Thornton,et al.  Tools for scientific thinking-microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching , 1987 .

[82]  Rebecca Clift,et al.  Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential , 2006 .

[83]  Elise Kärkkäinen,et al.  The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking , 2007 .

[84]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Essential Tension , 1977 .

[85]  David Hammer,et al.  Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom , 2010 .

[86]  Rebecca Clift.  Irony in conversation , 1999, Language in Society.

[87]  Paul Thagard,et al.  The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice , 1978 .

[88]  Tarja Nikula.  Pragmatic force modifiers : a study in interlanguage pragmatics , 1996 .

[89]  J. Gumperz.  Discourse strategies: Introduction , 1982 .

[90]  Scott Jacobs,et al.  Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: managing disagreement while managing not to disagree , 2002 .

[91]  D. Biber,et al.  Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect , 1989 .

[92]  Robert Englebretson,et al.  Stancetaking in discourse : subjectivity, evaluation, interaction , 2007 .

[93]  David Hammer,et al.  Framing for scientific argumentation , 2012 .

[94]  David Hammer,et al.  Student Behavior and Epistemological Framing: Examples from Collaborative Active-Learning Activities in Physics , 2007, ICLS.

[95]  David Hammer,et al.  Seeing the science in children's thinking : case studies of student inquiry in physical science : a staff developer's guide , 2006 .

[96]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[97]  J. Holmes.  Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech , 1990 .

[98]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Analyzing Problem Solving Using Math in Physics: Epistemic Framing Via Warrants , 2009 .

[99]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Implicating Uncertainty: The Pragmatics of Fall-Rise Intonation , 1985 .

[100]  Larry Laudan,et al.  Why was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned , 1980 .

[101]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Joking cultures: Humor themes as social regulation in group life , 2005 .

[102]  G. Bateson.  A theory of play and fantasy. , 1955 .

[103]  J. Dewey.  Experience and Education , 1938 .

[104]  E. Schegloff.  Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[105]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[106]  David Hammer,et al.  Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking , 2009 .

[107]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[108]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[109]  R. A. Engle,et al.  Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners Classroom , 2002 .

[110]  Andrew Elby,et al.  The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics , 2004 .

[111]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science , 2008 .

[112]  J. Holmes.  MODIFYING ILLOCUTIONARY FORCE , 1984 .

[113]  B. Greene,et al.  The elegant universe : superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory , 2000 .

[114]  Christina Siry,et al.  “Maybe the Algae was from the Filter”: Maybe and Similar Modifiers as Mediational Tools and Indicators of Uncertainty and Possibility in Children’s Science Talk , 2012 .

[115]  Michael Ford,et al.  ‘Grasp of Practice’ as a Reasoning Resource for Inquiry and Nature of Science Understanding , 2008 .

[116]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[117]  Jeffery M. Saul,et al.  Student expectations in introductory physics , 1998 .