Interdisciplinary criticism: Analysing the experience of riot! a location-sensitive digital narrative

This paper reports the findings from quantitative and qualitative studies of Riot! - a location-sensitive interactive play for voices. The paper begins by introducing Riot!; it then explores the growing literature on theories of experience and goes on to report the findings from three empirical studies of the event: a questionnaire-based survey of 563 participants; 30 semi-structured interviews with groups and individuals; and in-depth ethnographic case studies of four participants. It was clear from the survey that most people had enjoyed Riot! However, the interview data demonstrated that they had also experienced frustration even where overall enjoyment ratings were high. This is explored in relation to perception of the system and goal definition. The ethnographic case studies identify barriers to engagement in terms of individual identity and orientation. A critical theory-based analysis of Riot! further explicates the user experience in terms of literary devices such as characterisation and the development of narrative expectation.The studies identify a number of usability problems such as inconsistency of interaction and non-reversibility that caused frustration. The critical analysis also identifies problems with the script such as the presentation of linear narrative in a non-linear medium. It accounts for widely differing accounts of the experience with reference to the participant's individual orientations or habitus. The paper demonstrates the value of an interdisciplinary approach for exploring the commonality and particularity of user experience.

[1]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Understanding experience in interactive systems , 2004, DIS '04.

[2]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  MARC HASSENZAHL CHAPTER 3 The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2003 .

[3]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Making Sense of Experience , 2005, Funology.

[4]  Edward Branigan Narrative Comprehension and Film , 1992 .

[5]  John C. McCarthy,et al.  Technology as experience , 2004, INTR.

[6]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[7]  Steve Benford,et al.  Where on-line meets on the streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games , 2003, CHI '03.

[8]  Norbert Braun,et al.  Storytelling & Conversation to Improve the Fun Factor in Software Applications , 2005, Funology.

[9]  Ben J. C. Clayton,et al.  Rapid Authoring of Mediascapes , 2004, UbiComp.

[10]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers , 2000, DIS '00.

[11]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates are Running the Asylum , 1999, Software-Ergonomie.

[12]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[13]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Human-computer interaction (2nd ed.) , 1998 .

[14]  P. Bourdieu Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[15]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[16]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  Uncle Roy All Around You: Implicating the City in a Location-Based Performance , 2004 .

[17]  R. Joiner,et al.  Designing Educational Experiences Using Ubiquitous and Pervasive Technology , 2004 .

[18]  Alan Cooper,et al.  The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity (2nd Edition) , 1999 .

[19]  Duncan Rowland,et al.  The Error of Our Ways: The Experience of Self-Reported Position in a Location-Based Game , 2004, UbiComp.

[20]  Richard W. Joiner,et al.  Designing educational experiences using ubiquitous technology , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Eilean Hooper-Greenhill,et al.  Researching learning in museums and galleries 1990-1999: a bibliographic review , 2000 .

[22]  J. Bruner The Narrative Construction of Reality , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[23]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[24]  D. Norman Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[25]  P. Brook Empty Space , 1941, Nature.

[26]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[27]  E. Pearce Reform!: The Fight for the 1832 Reform Act , 2003 .

[28]  Amy L. Parsons,et al.  Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things , 2006 .

[29]  Marc Davis,et al.  Theoretical foundations for experiential systems design , 2003, ETP '03.

[30]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[31]  E. Goffman Presentation of Self , 2006 .

[32]  Andrew Hussey,et al.  The Game of War: The Life and Death of Guy Debord , 2001 .

[33]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Lessons from the lighthouse: collaboration in a shared mixed reality system , 2003, CHI '03.

[34]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[35]  Leo graf Tolstoy,et al.  What is art? and essays on art , 1897 .

[36]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[37]  R. Singleton,et al.  Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis , 2008 .

[38]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Sharing the Square: Collaborative Leisure in the City Streets , 2005, ECSCW.

[39]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[40]  Richard Hull,et al.  Designing Engaging Experiences with Children and Artists , 2005, Funology.

[41]  P. Jordan Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .

[42]  Greil Marcus,et al.  The Game of War: The Life and Death of Guy Debord (review) , 2002 .

[43]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  Review of Interaction design , 2003 .

[44]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[45]  O. Welles,et al.  This is Orson Welles , 1992 .

[46]  T. Pollock,et al.  A Grammar of Motives. , 1945 .

[47]  C. Brodsky The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[48]  J. Clifford,et al.  Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar , 1986 .

[49]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction , 2002, UBIQ.