Effects of thermal mass and flow rate on forced-circulation solar hot-water system: Comparison of water-in-glass and U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collectors

Abstract The energy performance of a water-in-glass evacuated-tube solar collector (WGETsc) and U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collector (UpETsc) is compared. The necessity and effectiveness of modeling WGETsc including thermal mass is validated by experimentation. A comparison of the thermal performance of systems installed with WGETsc and UpETsc having the same efficiency curve was made. The average thermal efficiency of WGETsc is less than that of UpETsc; WGETsc storage energy 25–35% is less than that of UpETsc because of fluid thermal mass influence for flow rates 10–70 kg/h m 2 . If fluid thermal mass is neglected then the useful energy output will be overpredicted in numerical simulations. Moreover, the flow rate may also affect system thermal performance. The UpETsc has small optimization flow rate range of 20–40 kg/h m 2 compared with 20–60 kg/h m 2 for WGETsc. Finally, the optimal flow rate for maximum useful energy is determined by meteorological conditions such as solar radiation and outdoor temperature, the pump control strategy and even the thermal performance of the collector.

[1]  Mervyn Smyth,et al.  Experimental field evaluation of novel concentrator augmented solar collectors for medium temperature applications , 2013 .

[2]  Wenfeng Gao,et al.  Optimal tilt-angles of all-glass evacuated tube solar collectors , 2009 .

[3]  Viorel Badescu.  Optimal control of flow in solar collector systems with fully mixed water storage tanks , 2008 .

[4]  V. Badescu.  Optimal control of flow in solar collectors for maximum exergy extraction , 2007 .

[5]  Yan Su.  ANALYSIS ON UNSTEADY STATE EFFICIENCY OF GLASS EVACUATED SOLAR COLLECTOR WITH AN INSERTED HEAT PIPE , 2008 .

[6]  Guofeng Yuan,et al.  A new dynamic test method for thermal performance of all-glass evacuated solar air collectors , 2012 .

[7]  Kenya Standard,et al.  Thermal solar systems and components — Solar collectors — Part 2: Test methods , 2008 .

[8]  Alireza Hobbi,et al.  Optimal design of a forced circulation solar water heating system for a residential unit in cold climate using TRNSYS , 2009 .

[9]  Hyunjoo Han,et al.  A three-dimensional performance analysis of all-glass vacuum tubes with coaxial fluid conduit , 2008 .

[10]  Simon Furbo,et al.  Theoretical flow investigations of an all glass evacuated tubular collector , 2007 .

[11]  Wongee Chun,et al.  The Performance Simulation of All-Glass Vacuum Tubes with Coaxial Fluid Conduit , 2007 .

[12]  Abdul Waheed Badar,et al.  Single and two-phase flow modeling and analysis of a coaxial vacuum tube solar collector , 2012 .

[13]  Masud Behnia,et al.  Measurement and simulation of flow rate in a water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heater , 2005 .

[14]  Wenfeng Gao,et al.  Comparative studies on thermal performance of water-in-glass evacuated tube solar water heaters with different collector tilt-angles , 2011 .

[15]  Zhangyuan Wang,et al.  Theoretical investigation of the performance of a novel loop heat pipe solar water heating system for use in Beijing, China , 2010 .

[16]  Yong Kim,et al.  Thermal performances comparisons of the glass evacuated tube solar collectors with shapes of absorber tube , 2007 .

[17]  Masud Behnia,et al.  Natural circulation flow through water-in-glass evacuated tube solar collectors , 2007 .

[18]  E. H. Amer,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of dynamic test procedures for solar flat-plate collectors , 2000 .

[19]  Chao Chen,et al.  All-glass vacuum tube collector heat transfer model used in forced-circulation solar water heating system , 2010 .