Comparison of different ED stack conceptions when applied for drinking water production from brackish waters

Abstract Three types of electrodialysis (ED) and electrodeionization (EDI) stacks are studied when treating NaCl solutions in the range of concentrations from 10 − 5 to 3 × 10 − 2  M: (1) with a non-conducting network spacer, (2) with a mixed ion-exchange monolayer bed, (3) with profiled membranes. The Sherwood number characterizing the desalination rate is measured in recirculation regime when the concentration of feed solution is slowly decreasing in time. The data obtained are compared with the results calculated and measured for “empty” desalination channels not containing any filling. It was established that the measured Sherwood numbers at overlimiting currents in stacks with filling are higher than that in “empty” channel under the same potential drop, while the latter, in turn, are higher than the Sherwood numbers calculated for limiting current density. The mass transfer rate in several cases (under 2.5 V par cell pair in diluted, − 4  M, solutions and high flow rates, > 7 dm 3 h − 1 dm − 1 , a stack with profiled membranes) may be 4 times higher than that in “empty” channel at limiting current density. The stacks with profiled membranes are shown to be effective in the overall range of concentrations. The stacks with non-conducting spacer can be used if the feed solution concentration is not too low, > 2 × 10 − 3  M in our experiments. The stacks with ion-exchange resins are more preferable in the case of treatment of strongly diluted solutions (e.g. at the second stage following an ED with profiled membranes), as well as in the cases where it is necessary to use a compact unit characterized by a low flow velocity, though the power consumption is slightly higher.

[1]  E. I. Belova,et al.  Effect of anion-exchange membrane surface properties on mechanisms of overlimiting mass transfer. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[2]  Keith Scott,et al.  Mass transfer characteristics of cross-corrugated membranes , 2002 .

[3]  Matthias Wessling,et al.  Role of membrane surface in concentration polarization at cation exchange membranes , 2004 .

[4]  Ain A. Sonin,et al.  A hydrodynamic theory of desalination by electrodialysis , 1968 .

[5]  G. Eigenberger,et al.  Application of electromembrane technology for providing drinking water for the population of the Aral region , 2002 .

[6]  R. Simons,et al.  Electric field effects on proton transfer between ionizable groups and water in ion exchange membranes , 1984 .

[7]  V. Nikonenko,et al.  Rate of Generation of Ions H+ and OH− at the Ion-Exchange Membrane/Dilute Solution Interface as a Function of the Current Density , 2005 .

[8]  Natalia Pismenskaya,et al.  On the role of gravitational convection in the transfer enhancement of salt ions in the course of dilute solution electrodialysis , 1996 .

[9]  Zaltzman,et al.  Electro-osmotically induced convection at a permselective membrane , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  Natalia Pismenskaya,et al.  Method of electrodialysis stack testing with the feed solution concentration regulation , 2003 .

[11]  S. Dukhin,et al.  Intensification of electrodialysis based on electroosmosis of the second kind , 1993 .

[12]  Hong-Joo Lee,et al.  Effects of Electrolytes on the Transport Phenomena in a Cation-Exchange Membrane. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.