Domestic Water Pricing with Household Surveys: A Study of Acceptability and Willingness to Pay in Chongqing, China

In determining domestic water prices, policy makers often need to use information about the demand side rather than only relying on information about the supply side. Household surveys have frequently been employed to collect demand-side information. This paper presents a multiple bounded discrete choice household survey model. It discusses how the model can be utilized to collect and analyze information about the acceptability of different water prices by different types of households, as well as households' willingness to pay for water service improvement. The results obtained from these surveys can be directly utilized in the development of water pricing and subsidy policies. The paper also presents an empirical multiple bounded discrete choice study conducted in Chongqing, China. In this case, domestic water service quality was seriously inadequate, but financial resources were insufficient to improve service quality. With a survey of about 1,500 households in five suburban districts in Chongqing Municipality, this study shows that a significant increase in the water price is feasible as long as the poorest households can be properly subsidized and certain public awareness and accountability campaigns can be conducted to make the price increase more acceptable to the public. The analysis also indicates that the order in which hypothetical prices are presented to respondents systematically affects their answers, and should be taken into account when designing survey instruments.

[1]  Ronald C. Griffin,et al.  Water Resource Economics: The Analysis of Scarcity, Policies, and Projects , 2005 .

[2]  Houtven 1 The Use of Willingness to Pay Experiments : Estimating demand for piped water connections in Sri , 2006 .

[3]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  Elicitation Effects in Contingent Valuation: Comparisons to a Multiple Bounded Discrete Choice Approach , 1998 .

[4]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  The Use of Willingness to Pay Experiments: Estimating Demand for Piped Water Connections in Sri Lanka , 2006 .

[5]  Arnaud Reynaud,et al.  Estimating the benefits of efficient water pricing in France , 2004 .

[6]  John Quiggin,et al.  Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-Up Questionnaire , 1994 .

[7]  S. Renzetti Evaluating the Welfare Effects of Reforming Municipal Water Prices. Proposed Running Head: Reforming Water Prices , 1992 .

[8]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty , 2003 .

[9]  Ramesh Bhatia,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Actual Behavior: Predicting Connections to New Water Systems in the State of Kerala, India , 1995 .

[10]  R. Johansson Pricing Irrigation Water: A Literature Survey , 2000 .

[11]  Hua Wang,et al.  Treatment of “Don't-Know” Responses in Contingent Valuation Surveys: A Random Valuation Model , 1997 .

[12]  Samuel Fankhauser,et al.  Can poor consumers pay for energy and water? An affordability analysis for transition countries , 2007 .

[13]  A Spatial Analysis Of The Distributional Effects Of Water Quantity Management , 2001 .

[14]  R. Grafton,et al.  Pricing Sydney water , 2007 .

[15]  S. Renzetti Estimating the Structure of Industrial Water Demands: The Case of Canadian Manufacturing , 1992 .

[16]  R. Tol,et al.  Water Use in China’s Domestic, Industrial and Agricultural Sectors: An Empirical Analysis , 2005 .

[17]  Jeremy Warford,et al.  Water supply pricing in China : economic efficiency, environment, and social affordability , 2007 .

[18]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Multiple-Bounded Uncertainty Choice Data as Probabilistic Intentions , 2003, Land Economics.

[19]  Galli,et al.  Water under pressure , 2000, Physical review letters.

[20]  Glenn C. Blomquist,et al.  Contingent Valuation When Respondents Are Ambivalent , 1995 .

[21]  Dale Whittington,et al.  Measuring individuals' valuation distributions using a stochastic payment card approach , 2005 .

[22]  Leif Mattsson,et al.  Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: an improved structural model for contingent valuation. , 1995 .

[23]  A. Deshpande,et al.  Consumer's willingness to pay more for municipal supplied water: a case study , 2002 .

[24]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .