Consumer Reactions to Brand Extensions in a Competitive Context: Does Fit Still Matter?

Research indicates that reactions to brand extensions are influenced by the fit between the parent brand and the extension product category. The normative nature of this effect is limited because assessments of brand extensions are typically obtained in the absence of competition. The boundaries of prior research are investigated by testing whether the fit-extension relationship generalizes to scenarios that include relatively more or less familiar competitor brands. Support is found for this relationship in noncompetitive scenarios but is diminished by competitors' relative brand familiarity. Perceived risk mediates the effects of fit in noncompetitive settings and competitor brand familiarity in competitive settings. (c) 2010 by JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, Inc..

[1]  Mary W. Sullivan.  Brand Extensions: When to Use Them , 1992 .

[2]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[3]  S. Posavac,et al.  The Brand Positivity Effect: When Evaluation Confers Preference , 2004 .

[4]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[5]  Glenn H. Bracht,et al.  The External Validity of Experiments1 , 1968 .

[6]  Steven P. Brown,et al.  Effects of Brand Awareness on Choice for a Common, Repeat-Purchase Product , 1990 .

[7]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  The Moderating Role of Involvement and Differentiation in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions , 2002 .

[8]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension , 1994 .

[9]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency , 1992 .

[10]  J. Lynch.  On the External Validity of Experiments in Consumer Research , 1982 .

[11]  David A. Aaker,et al.  The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions , 1992 .

[12]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Compromising the compromise effect: Brands matter , 2007 .

[13]  Richard R. Klink,et al.  Threats to the External Validity of Brand Extension Research , 2001 .

[14]  Margaret C. Campbell,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm , 2001 .

[15]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Rethinking the effect of perceived fit on customers’ evaluations of new products , 1995 .

[16]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  New Brands Versus Brand Extensions, Attitudes Versus Choice: Experimental Evidence for Theory and Practice , 2001 .

[17]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  Experimentation in the 21st century: The importance of external validity , 1999 .

[18]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[19]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Brand-extension price premiums: The effects of perceived fit and extension product category risk , 2005 .

[20]  Tülin Erdem.  An Empirical Analysis of Umbrella Branding , 1998 .

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Franziska Völckner,et al.  Drivers of Brand Extension Success , 2006 .

[23]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Does Loving a Brand Mean Loving Its Products? the Role of Brand-Elicited Affect in Brand Extension Evaluations , 2005 .

[24]  Michael S. Humphreys,et al.  Sponsorship-linked marketing: The role of articulation in memory , 2006 .

[25]  Sandra J. Milberg,et al.  Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency , 1991 .

[26]  James L. Oakley,et al.  Order of Entry and the Moderating Role of Comparison Brands in Brand Extension Evaluation , 2008 .

[27]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together? , 1998 .

[28]  Sanjay Sood,et al.  “Deep” and “Surface” Cues: Brand Extension Evaluations by Children and Adults , 2002 .

[29]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[30]  A. Chernev.  Decision Focus and Consumer Choice Among Assortments , 2006 .

[31]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Diluting Brand Beliefs: When Do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? , 1993 .

[32]  Carrie M. Heilman,et al.  The Evolution of Brand Preferences and Choice Behaviors of Consumers New to a Market , 2000 .

[33]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  The Effect of Multiple Extrinsic Cues on Quality Perceptions: A Matter of Consistency , 2005 .

[34]  Joydeep Srivastava,et al.  Effect of Manufacturer Reputation, Retailer Reputation, and Product Warranty on Consumer Judgments of Product Quality: A Cue Diagnosticity Framework , 2001 .

[35]  S. Posavac,et al.  Blissful Insularity: When Brands are Judged in Isolation from Competitors , 2005 .

[36]  J. Wind,et al.  Guest Editorial: Is Marketing Academia Losing Its Way? , 2009 .

[37]  Anne L. Roggeveen,et al.  Does the Frame of a Comparative Ad Moderate the Effectiveness of Extrinsic Information Cues , 2006 .

[38]  J. Swait,et al.  Brand Credibility, Brand Consideration, and Choice , 2004 .