How should we quantify asthma control? A proposal.

BACKGROUND Current asthma guidelines suggest a series of criteria to assess if asthma is controlled. However, there is a need to develop a simple and practical method to quantify the degree of such control, both in clinical practice and research. STUDY OBJECTIVES This report describes a new method to quantify asthma control based on a percentage score. It also aims at comparing the percentage scores obtained with patient's self-evaluation of asthma control and a current validated Mini Asthma Quality of Life (MAQOL) questionnaire. SETTING AND SUBJECTS Forty-two subjects (25 female and 17 male patients) with asthma of different severity recruited from a tertiary center asthma clinic. METHODS The asthma scoring method provided a percentage control for symptoms, baseline expiratory flows and, an optional parameter, for airway inflammation assessed from induced-sputum eosinophil count. These control parameters were compared to an overall assessment of asthma control by the patient (also on a 100% scale) and the score obtained from a validated MAQOL questionnaire. RESULTS Mean +/- SEM scores for symptoms, expiratory flows, and airway eosinophilia (last 2 weeks) were 87.8 +/- 1.4%, 88.6 +/- 1.8%, and 66.2 +/- 3.9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between these three parameters (p > 0.05). The mean global asthma control score and the score estimated by the patient were 80.9 +/- 1.5% and 91.7 +/- 1.5%, respectively (not significantly different). There was a significant correlation between asthma control score (percentage) and percentage symptom score (p < 0.001), while it almost achieved significance for FEV(1) (p = 0.05). Only symptom scores correlated with the MAQOL questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS We developed a simple easy-to-use asthma control scoring system based on a percentage of optimal control. The percentage symptom score but not the global control score of this new method correlated with patient's global assessment of asthma control. This could be a simple tool that is potentially useful both for the clinician and for research purposes, to quantify global or specific aspects of asthma control.

[1]  L. Boulet,et al.  Evaluation of asthma control by physicians and patients: comparison with current guidelines. , 2002, Canadian respiratory journal.

[2]  C. Lemière,et al.  Differential cell counts in sputum in respiratory epidemiology: a pilot study. , 2001, Chest.

[3]  R. Hancox,et al.  The predictive value of exhaled nitric oxide measurements in assessing changes in asthma control. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[4]  P. Barnes,et al.  Exhaled markers of pulmonary disease. , 2001, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[5]  P. Gibson,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of airway inflammation in children: induced sputum, exhaled nitric oxide, and breath condensate. , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[6]  L. Boulet,et al.  Physician asthma management practices in Canada. , 2000, Canadian respiratory journal.

[7]  R. Pauwels,et al.  Asthma control: where do we fail? , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[8]  K. Rabe,et al.  Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the Asthma Insights and Reality in Europe (AIRE) study. , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[9]  R. Leigh,et al.  Success and safety of sputum induction in the clinical setting. , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[10]  E. Juniper,et al.  Measuring asthma control. Clinic questionnaire or daily diary? , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[11]  P. Gibson,et al.  Monitoring the patient with asthma: an evidence-based approach. , 2000, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  M. Sears,et al.  Induced sputum cell counts: their usefulness in clinical practice. , 2000, The European respiratory journal.

[13]  R. Pauwels,et al.  Use of induced sputum in the diagnosis and follow-up of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2000, Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace.

[14]  A. Bauman,et al.  Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  Pierre Ernst,et al.  Canadian asthma consensus report, 1999 , 1999 .

[16]  S. Daugherty,et al.  Asthma care practices, perceptions, and beliefs of Chicago-area primary-care physicians. Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative Project Team. , 1999, Chest.

[17]  G H Guyatt,et al.  Development and validation of a questionnaire to measure asthma control. , 1999, The European respiratory journal.

[18]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Development and validation of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1999, The European respiratory journal.

[19]  J. Vandenbroucke,et al.  Clinical control and histopathologic outcome of asthma when using airway hyperresponsiveness as an additional guide to long-term treatment. The AMPUL Study Group. , 1999, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[20]  L. Boulet,et al.  Influence on asthma morbidity of asthma education programs based on self-management plans following treatment optimization. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[21]  E. Yelin,et al.  Perceived control of asthma: development and validation of a questionnaire. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[22]  R. Dales,et al.  Spirometry utilization in Ontario: practice patterns and policy implications. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[23]  L. Green,et al.  The use of objective measures of asthma severity in primary care: a report from ASPN. , 1995, The Journal of family practice.

[24]  L. Boulet,et al.  Perception scoring of induced bronchoconstriction as an index of awareness of asthma symptoms. , 1994, Chest.