On Fast Multi-Shot COVID-19 Interventions for Post Lock-Down Mitigation

Fast intermittent lock-down intervals with regular period are suggested as a COVID-19 exit strategy from the widely adopted policy of total lock-down. Many proposed exit strategies have risks and uncertainties which could lead to a second wave of infection [1,2]. We demonstrate that our proposed policies have the potential to be a method of virus suppression, while at the same time allowing continued (albeit reduced) economic activity. Furthermore, these policies, while not eliminating the virus, can nevertheless be sustained over long periods of time, until a vaccine or treatment becomes available. The robustness of these policies stems from the fact that they are open loop methods; namely, lock-down periods are not triggered by measurements -- inevitably uncertain and delayed -- over short time scales such as hospital admissions, but rather are driven by predictable, high-frequency, periodic triggers in- and out- of lock-down. A slow and inherently robust outer supervisory feedback loop, based on measurements over longer time scales, is used to tune the parameters of the mitigation strategy. These methods can act alone, or can be used in combination with other mitigation strategies, to provide additional levels of effectiveness in their operation.

[1]  Liying Zhu,et al.  The dynamics of an SIQS epidemic model with pulse quarantine , 2008, 2008 Chinese Control and Decision Conference.

[2]  A. J. Hall Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[3]  H. Hethcote,et al.  Effects of quarantine in six endemic models for infectious diseases. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[4]  William T. Pike,et al.  An international comparison of the second derivative of COVID-19 deaths after implementation of social distancing measures , 2020, medRxiv.

[5]  Ruiyun Li,et al.  Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) , 2020, Science.

[6]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[7]  Xinzhu Meng,et al.  Impulsive Switching Epidemic Model with Benign Worm Defense and Quarantine Strategy , 2020, Complex..

[8]  M. Branicky Multiple Lyapunov functions and other analysis tools for switched and hybrid systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[9]  G. Chowell,et al.  Transmission potential of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) onboard the diamond Princess Cruises Ship, 2020 , 2020, Infectious Disease Modelling.

[10]  L. Stone,et al.  Seasonal dynamics of recurrent epidemics , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Robert Shorten,et al.  Stability Criteria for Switched and Hybrid Systems , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[12]  C. Whittaker,et al.  Report 9: Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID19 mortality and healthcare demand , 2020 .

[13]  Francesco Di Lauro,et al.  The timing of one-shot interventions for epidemic control , 2020, medRxiv.

[14]  Francesco Casella Can the COVID-19 epidemic be managed on the basis of daily data? , 2020, ArXiv.