Evaluating the Use of an Integrated Approach to Support Energy and Climate Policy Formulation and Evaluation

With the adoption of the Kyoto Protocol in 1997 national leaders have started investigating options for reducing carbon emissions within national borders [1]. Despite confronting similar energy issues, every country that adopted the Kyoto Protocol has a unique energy strategy [1,2] -being characterized by a different context, social, economic or environmental that influences the way different nations deal with climate change and other energy-related issues. Finding that currently available energy models are often too detailed or narrowly focused to inform longer-term policy formulation and evaluation holistically [3], the present study proposes the utilization of an integrated cross-sectoral medium to longer-term research and modeling approach, incorporating various methodologies to minimize exogenous assumptions and endogenously represent the key drivers of the system analyzed. The framework proposed includes feedback, delays and non-linearity and focuses on structure, scenarios and policies, requires a profound customization of the model that goes beyond a new parameterization. The inclusion of social and environmental factors, in addition to economic ones, all unique to the geographical area analyzed, allows for a wider analysis of the implication of policies by identifying potential side effect or longer-term bottlenecks for socio-economic development and environmental preservation arising from cross-sectoral relations.

[1]  Yaman Barlas,et al.  Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics , 1996 .

[2]  Adrian Musters,et al.  The energy-economy-environment interaction and the rebound-effect , 1995 .

[3]  J. Forrester,et al.  Road maps: A guide to learning system dynamics , 1996 .

[4]  Andrea M. Bassi,et al.  Quantifying cross-sectoral impacts of investments in climate change mitigation in Ecuador , 2009 .

[5]  R. Hirsch,et al.  Peaking of world oil production: Impacts, mitigation, & risk management , 2005 .

[6]  Andrea M. Bassi,et al.  An integrated approach to energy prospects for North America and the rest of the world , 2010 .

[7]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  System dynamics—the next fifty years , 2007 .

[8]  R. Howarth,et al.  Economics, ethics, and climate policy: framing the debate , 1996 .

[9]  Andrea M. Bassi,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Support Energy Policy Formulation and Evaluation , 2009 .

[10]  Arne Drud,et al.  Macroeconomic modeling based on social-accounting principles , 1986 .

[11]  Thomas H. Karas.  Modelers and policymakers : improving the relationships. , 2004 .

[12]  Andrea M. Bassi,et al.  A context-inclusive approach to support energy policy formulation and evaluation , 2011 .

[13]  R. J. Deam,et al.  A world energy model , 1974 .

[14]  Andrea M. Bassi.  ANALYZING THE ROLE OF INTEGRATED, DYNAMIC, NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING MODELS TO SUPPORT POLICY FORMULATION AND EVALUATION , 2009 .

[15]  Jørgen Randers,et al.  Elements of the System Dynamics Method , 1997 .

[16]  John Dimitropoulos,et al.  Energy productivity improvements and the rebound effect: An overview of the state of knowledge , 2007 .

[17]  John D. Sterman,et al.  A Skeptic’s Guide to Computer Models , 1997 .

[18]  Michael Pidd,et al.  An introduction to computer simulation , 1994, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference.

[19]  Joseph Fiksel,et al.  T21-Ohio, a System Dynamics Approach to Policy Assessment for Sustainable Development: A Waste to Profit Case Study , 2010 .

[20]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[21]  A. Bassi,et al.  Informing the US Energy Policy Debate with Threshold 21 , 2010 .

[22]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  Executive knowledge, models and learning , 1992 .

[23]  J. Forrester.  Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[24]  W. Jevons,et al.  On the Coal Question , 1873, Nature.

[25]  Arun Kumar Tripathi,et al.  On the Internet: Thinking in Action , 2002 .

[26]  A. P. de Geus.  Modelling to predict or to learn , 1992 .

[27]  Andrea M. Bassi,et al.  Creating synergies from renewable energy investments, a community success story from Lolland, Denmark. , 2009 .

[28]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[29]  N. Stern.  The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[30]  Hillard G. Huntington,et al.  Energy security and climate change protection: Complementarity or tradeoff? , 2008 .