Functional genomics of critical illness and injury

Despite the increasing wealth of available patient information, diagnosis in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains paradoxically and frustratingly difficult. This is caused, in part, by the complicated nature of critical illness coupled with the frequent inability of ICU patients to communicate. All critical care physicians can attest to the frustration of suspecting that there is a pathologic process lurking somewhere within, leaving only the subtlest clues. For example, consider the critically ill patient with a mild leukocytosis and a new low-grade fever. Is there an infection? Is it sepsis? If so, where is the source? The computed tomographic scan of the abdomen or chest is frequently nonspecific and has not made obsolete the diagnostic utility of careful, serial physical examinations. Cultures of sputum, blood, urine, or cerebrospinal fluid are neither fast nor sensitive. The diagnostic armamentarium abounds with other laboratory tests, such as serum electrolytes, liver function tests, lactic acid levels, and coagulation profiles, that by themselves serve only as markers of organ dysfunction. Should broad-spectrum antibiotics be started empirically? As a result of their indiscriminate use, nosocomial infections with multidrugresistant organisms continue to rise with alarming frequency. In the back of the clinician’s mind, other haunting questions are whispered: Is this the start of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)? If so, will it lead to death? How can these issues be resolved? Recent advances in biotechnology and the sequencing of the human genome offer unprecedented opportunities to increase our understanding of critical illness and injury. More importantly, the exciting new field of functional genomics will provide the scientific basis for dramatic improvements in the accuracy of diagnostic and prognostic tests and for identifying new therapeutic targets (1). In the examples cited above, for instance, whole-genome changes in circulating leukocyte transcription and translation can be examined to determine what these cells “know” that the patients, numerous available blood tests, and sophisticated radiologic studies cannot tell. This review summarizes the new investigative paradigms, technology, and analysis that make broad-scale genomics possible, along with some recent data from studies of critical illness and injury in patients and clinically relevant animal models (2– 6).

[1]  P. Rhee,et al.  cDNA array analysis of gene expression following hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation in rats. , 2002, Resuscitation.

[2]  T G Buchman,et al.  Complex systems analysis: a tool for shock research. , 2001, Shock.

[3]  Buchman Tg,et al.  microArRAY of hope , 2001 .

[4]  S. Dhanasekaran,et al.  Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer , 2001, Nature.

[5]  R. Hotchkiss,et al.  SEPSIS GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING II: EFFECT OF ANTIBIOTICS OVER TIME ON MURINE SPLENOCYTES AFTER CECAL LIGATION AND PUNCTURE.: 78 , 2001 .

[6]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Centralization: a new method for the normalization of gene expression data , 2001, ISMB.

[7]  M. Ringnér,et al.  Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene expression profiling and artificial neural networks , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[8]  P. Rhee,et al.  MICROARRAY ANALYSIS OF GENE EXPRESSION FOLLOWING HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK AND RESUSCITATION IN RATS.: 76 , 2001 .

[9]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[10]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[11]  G. Stormo,et al.  INJURY IN THE ERA OF GENOMICS , 2001, Shock.

[12]  E. Dougherty,et al.  Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  F. Collins,et al.  Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  C. Li,et al.  Analyzing high‐density oligonucleotide gene expression array data , 2001, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[15]  R. Albert,et al.  The large-scale organization of metabolic networks , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data , 2000, Bioinform..

[17]  G. A. Whitmore,et al.  Importance of replication in microarray gene expression studies: statistical methods and evidence from repetitive cDNA hybridizations. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Young,et al.  Biomedical Discovery with DNA Arrays , 2000, Cell.

[19]  N. Risch Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium , 2000, Nature.

[20]  E. Winzeler,et al.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays , 2000, Nature.

[21]  G. Sherlock Analysis of large-scale gene expression data. , 2000, Current opinion in immunology.

[22]  C. Sander,et al.  Genomic medicine and the future of health care. , 2000, Science.

[23]  T. Gaasterland,et al.  Making the most of microarray data , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[24]  K. Mir The hypothesis is there is no hypothesis. The Microarray Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 22-25 September 1999. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[25]  D Haussler,et al.  Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  H. Sather,et al.  Expression of aberrantly spliced oncogenic ikaros isoforms in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  W. Rizzo,et al.  The molecular basis of Sjögren-Larsson syndrome: mutation analysis of the fatty aldehyde dehydrogenase gene. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  Patrick O. Brown,et al.  Observing the living genome , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[29]  J. Mesirov,et al.  Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. , 1999, Science.

[30]  U. Alon,et al.  Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissues probed by oligonucleotide arrays. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Fishing Expeditions , 1998, Science.

[33]  M. Stearns,et al.  Dismissal of Faculty , 1998, Science.

[34]  E. Deitch ANIMAL MODELS OF SEPSIS AND SHOCK: A REVIEW AND LESSONS LEARNED , 1998, Shock.

[35]  M. Boguski,et al.  Functional genomics: it's all how you read it. , 1997, Science.

[36]  R. Hotchkiss,et al.  Apoptosis in lymphoid and parenchymal cells during sepsis: findings in normal and T- and B-cell-deficient mice. , 1997, Critical care medicine.

[37]  I. Chaudry,et al.  Evaluation of factors affecting mortality rate after sepsis in a murine cecal ligation and puncture model. , 1983, Surgery.

[38]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[39]  S J Spengler,et al.  Techview: computers and biology. Bioinformatics in the information age. , 2000, Science.

[40]  P. Brown,et al.  Genomic views of the immune system*. , 2000, Annual review of immunology.

[41]  E. Lander Array of hope , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[42]  M. Morley,et al.  Making and reading microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.