Knowledge-system theory in society: Charting the growth of knowledge-system models over a decade, 1994–2003

The second half of the twentieth century saw the emergence of three knowledge-system models: Mode 2 knowledge production, the Triple Helix, and Post-Normal Science (PNS). Today, this emphasis on knowledge use is the focus of such important health movements as evidence-based medicine. Building on the methodological work of Shinn (2002) and the theoretical work of Holzner and Marx (1979), we conducted a bibliometric study of the extent to which the three knowledge-system models are used by researchers to frame problems of health-knowledge use. By doing so, we reveal how these models fit into a larger knowledge system of health and evidence-based decision making. The study results show clearly that although these knowledge models are extremely popular for contextualizing research, there is a distinct lack of emphasis on use of the models in knowledge utilization or evidence-based medicine. We recommend using these models for further research in three specific dimensions of health systems analysis: (a) differences in language use, (b) transformative thinking about health-knowledge functions, and (c) ethical analysis of institutional linkages. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  N. Morris.  Vial bodies: conflicting interests in the move to new institutional relationships in biological medicines research and regulation , 2000 .

[2]  M. Manen.  Transdisciplinarity and the New Production of Knowledge , 2001 .

[3]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  The Agora and the Role of Research Evaluation , 2003 .

[4]  L. Salter,et al.  Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards , 1988 .

[5]  José Luis Ortega Priego,et al.  A Vector Space Model as a methodological approach to the Triple Helix dimensionality: A comparative study of Biology and Biomedicine Centres of two European National Research Councils from a Webometric view , 2003, Scientometrics.

[6]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research , 2003, Scientometrics.

[7]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The second academic revolution and the rise of entrepreneurial science , 2001, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[8]  Yoshiko Okubo,et al.  Bibliometric indicators and analysis of research systems , 1997 .

[9]  M. Calnan,et al.  Analysing process in healthcare: the methodological and theoretical challenges , 2003 .

[10]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science , 1992 .

[11]  A. Wilts.  Forms of research organisation and their responsiveness to external goal setting , 2000 .

[12]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process , 2003, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  C. Estabrooks,et al.  Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. , 2004, Nursing research.

[14]  Hilary Robinson,et al.  Global governance of technology: meeting the needs of developing countries , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[15]  G. Böhme,et al.  The structures and prospects of knowledge society , 1997 .

[16]  J. Ravetz,et al.  The post-normal science of precaution , 2004 .

[17]  J Harvey,et al.  Reflections from organization science on the development of primary health care research networks. , 2001, Family practice.

[18]  Norma Morris,et al.  The Changing Landscape of Regulatory Control of Biological Medicines , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Ritu Sadana,et al.  Knowledge for better health: a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. , 2003, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[20]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[21]  K. Sweeney,et al.  Clinical evaluation: constructing a new model for post-normal medicine. , 2002, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[22]  Jerome R Ravetz,et al.  Risk Management as a Postnormal Science2. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Devrim Goktepe,et al.  The Triple Helix as a model to analyze Israeli Magnet Program and lessons for late-developing countries like Turkey , 2003, Scientometrics.

[24]  Kieran Sweeney Ma MPhil Frcgp,et al.  Clinical evaluation: constructing a new model for post‐normal medicine , 2002 .

[25]  Novel mode of knowledge production? Producers and consumers in health services research , 2003, Journal of health services research & policy.

[26]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors , 2003, Scientometrics.

[27]  J. Ravetz.  Food Safety, Quality, and Ethics – A Post-normal Perspective , 2002 .

[28]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[29]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems , 2002, Scientometrics.

[30]  Will clinicians' challenges be solved by another theoretical model? Commentary on Sweeney & Kernick (2002), Clinical evaluation: constructing a new model for post-normal medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 8, 131-138. , 2002, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[31]  Norman Crump.  Managing professional integration in an acute hospital – a socio‐political analysis , 2002 .

[32]  K. Debackere,et al.  Measuring Progress and Evolution in Science and Technology - Ii: The Multiple Uses of Technometric Indicators , 2002 .

[33]  F. Tuzi.  Useful science is good science: empirical evidence from the Italian National Research Council , 2005 .

[34]  C. Weiss.  Using social research in public policy making , 1979 .

[35]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Why Do Web Sites from Different Academic Subjects Interlink? , 2003, J. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Paul Wouters,et al.  Citation cycles and peer review cycles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[37]  Olle Persson,et al.  Regional R&D activities and interactions in the Swedish Triple Helix , 2003, Scientometrics.

[38]  Virgil Pasquale Diodato,et al.  Dictionary of Bibliometrics , 1994 .

[39]  J Lomas,et al.  Research and evidence–based decision making , 1997, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[40]  C. Estabrooks.  The conceptual structure of research utilization. , 1999, Research in nursing & health.

[41]  L. Lievrouw.  The Invisible College Reconsidered , 1989 .

[42]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Public entrepreneur: the trajectory of United States science, technology and industrial policy , 1999 .

[43]  Martin J Buxton,et al.  The utilisation of health research in policy-making : concepts , examples and methods of assessment , 2003 .

[44]  Non-instrumental roles of science , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[45]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science , 2002 .

[46]  Fritz Machlup.  The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States , 1962 .

[47]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[48]  David Waltner-Toews.  The end of medicine: the beginning of health , 2000 .

[49]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[50]  B. Holzner,et al.  Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society , 1979 .