Dissociable cortical processing of recognizable and non-recognizable biological movement: analysing gamma MEG activity.

Recognition of biological motion is one of the essential ingredients of human evolutionary survival. When biological motion is revealed solely by a set of light dots on the joints of an invisible human figure, the perceptual system reliably distinguishes it from similar configurations. Here, we assessed the changes in neuromagnetic cortical responses during visual perception of biological motion. Healthy humans saw a randomized set of stimuli consisting of a point-light canonical walker and a scrambled configuration in which the spatial positions of dots were randomly rearranged on the screen. In separate runs, configurations were presented either within an upright or inverted (180 degrees ) orientation in the image plane. Participants performed a one-back repetition task lifting a forefinger in response to the second of two consecutive identical stimuli of each type. Both recognizable upright and non-recognizable inverted walkers evoke enhancements in oscillatory gamma brain activity (25-30 Hz) over the left occipital cortices as early as 100 ms from stimulus onset. Only a recognizable upright walker, however, yields further consecutive peaks over the parietal (130 ms) and right temporal (170 ms) lobes. Scrambled displays do not elicit any increases in the gamma response. The stimulus-specific time course and topographic dynamics of cortical oscillatory activity indicate that the brain rapidly dissociates spatial coherence and meaning revealed through biological movement.

[1]  G Johansson,et al.  Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception , 1976, Psychological research.

[2]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  James E. Cutting,et al.  A program to generate synthetic walkers as dynamic point-light displays , 1978 .

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  R. Fox,et al.  The perception of biological motion by human infants. , 1982, Science.

[6]  S. Runeson,et al.  Kinematic specification of dynamics as an informational basis for person and action perception: Expe , 1983 .

[7]  S. Sumi Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[8]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[11]  L M Herman,et al.  Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded video displays of an artificial gestural language. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  S Makeig,et al.  Human auditory evoked gamma-band magnetic fields. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  B. Feige,et al.  Oscillatory brain activity during a motor task. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[15]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  High frequency (60-90 Hz) oscillations in primary visual cortex of awake monkey. , 1993, Neuroreport.

[16]  R. Blake Cats Perceive Biological Motion , 1993 .

[17]  D. Perrett,et al.  Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to Biological Motion Stimuli , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of objects and their component parts: responses of single units in the temporal cortex of the macaque. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  J. Pernier,et al.  Gamma‐range Activity Evoked by Coherent Visual Stimuli in Humans , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[20]  P Clochon,et al.  A new method for quantifying EEG event-related desynchronization:amplitude envelope analysis. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Specific Involvement of Human Parietal Systems and the Amygdala in the Perception of Biological Motion , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-dependent synchronization of neuronal responses in the visual cortex of the awake macaque monkey , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  P. McLeod,et al.  Preserved and Impaired Detection of Structure From Motion by a 'Motion-blind" Patient , 1996 .

[25]  C. Gray,et al.  Stimulus-Dependent Neuronal Oscillations and Local Synchronization in Striate Cortex of the Alert Cat , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory gamma-band (30-70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. , 1997, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  Rp Hobson,et al.  Components of person perception: An investigation with autistic, non‐autistic retarded and typically developing children and adolescents , 1997 .

[28]  J. Pernier,et al.  Oscillatory γ-Band (30–70 Hz) Activity Induced by a Visual Search Task in Humans , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  T. Schenk,et al.  Visual motion perception after brain damage: II. Deficits in form-from-motion perception , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[32]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Induced γ-Band Activity during the Delay of a Visual Short-Term Memory Task in Humans , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  David C. Burr,et al.  Seeing biological motion , 1998, Nature.

[34]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Human Gamma Band Activity and Perception of a Gestalt , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  C Braun,et al.  Gamma-band MEG activity to coherent motion depends on task-driven attention. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[36]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  A dissociation between spatial and identity matching in callosotomy patients. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[38]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[39]  F. Varela,et al.  Perception's shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity , 1999, Nature.

[40]  R. Vogels,et al.  Effect of image scrambling on inferior temporal cortical responses. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[41]  A. Cowey,et al.  Blindness to form from motion despite intact static form perception and motion detection , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  M. Whittington,et al.  Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[44]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Right-Hemisphere Dominance for the Processing of Sound-Source Lateralization , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  C S Herrmann,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic responses to illusory figures: early evoked gamma is affected by processing of stimulus features. , 2000, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[46]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  P. Sinha,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Does Perception of Biological Motion Rely on Specific Brain Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[51]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[52]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Recognition of Point-Light Biological Motion Displays by Young Children , 2001, Perception.

[53]  Adrian L. Williams,et al.  Task-Related Changes in Cortical Synchronization Are Spatially Coincident with the Hemodynamic Response , 2002, NeuroImage.

[54]  J. Palva,et al.  Distinct Gamma-Band Evoked Responses to Speech and Non-Speech Sounds in Humans , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Biological Motion Perception: an fMRI Study , 2022 .

[56]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Intact Perception of Biological Motion in the Face of Profound Spatial Deficits: Williams Syndrome , 2002, Psychological science.

[57]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion , 2002, Neuron.

[58]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Dynamics of gamma-band activity induced by auditory pattern changes in humans. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  A. Thiele,et al.  Neuronal synchrony does not correlate with motion coherence in cortical area MT , 2003, Nature.

[60]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early periventricular brain lesions. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[61]  Marina Pavlova,et al.  Prior Knowledge about Display Inversion in Biological Motion Perception , 2003, Perception.

[62]  Aina Puce,et al.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[63]  T. Allison,et al.  Brain Activity Evoked by the Perception of Human Walking: Controlling for Meaningful Coherent Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[64]  Daniel Gembris,et al.  Top-down attentional processing enhances auditory evoked gamma band activity , 2003, Neuroreport.

[65]  Albert Gjedde,et al.  Separate neural pathways for contour and biological-motion cues in motion-defined animal shapes , 2003, NeuroImage.

[66]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Recognition of Biological Motion is Impaired in Children With Autism , 2003, Psychological science.

[67]  R. Eckhorn,et al.  Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex? , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.