A Fully Projective Formulation for Lowe's Tracking Algorithm

David Lowe's innuential and classic algorithm for tracking objects with known geometry is formulated with certain simplifying assumptions. A version implemented by Ishii et al. makes diierent simplifying assumptions. We formulate a full projective solution and apply the same algorithm (Newton's method). We report results of extensive testing of these three algorithms. We compute two image{space and six pose{space error metrics to quantify the eeects of object pose, errors in initial solutions, and image noise levels. We consider several scenaria, from relatively unconstrained conditions to those that mirror real{world and real{ time constraints. The conclusion is that the full projective formulation makes the algorithm orders of magnitude more accurate and gives it super{exponential convergence properties with arguably better computation{time properties.

[1]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Three-Dimensional Object Recognition from Single Two-Dimensional Images , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[2]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Fitting Parameterized Three-Dimensional Models to Images , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Real-time computer vision , 1995 .

[4]  Michel Dhome,et al.  Determination of the Attitude of 3D Objects from a Single Perspective View , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Alistair J. Bray Tracking objects using image disparities , 1990, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Alan M. McIvor,et al.  An Analysis of Lowe's Model-based Vision System , 1988, Alvey Vision Conference.

[7]  Kiriakos N. Kutulakos,et al.  Affine object representations for calibration-free augmented reality , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[8]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Iterative Pose Estimation Using Coplanar Feature Points , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[9]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Pose Determination of a Three-Dimensional Object Using Triangle Pairs , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[11]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  A New Generalized Computational Framework for Finding Object Orientation Using Perspective Trihedral Angle Constraint , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Tao Daniel Alter 3-D Pose from 3 Points Using Weak-Perspective , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Masayoshi Kakikura,et al.  A 3-D Sensor System for Teaching Robot Paths and Environments , 1987 .

[14]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  Active vision , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Mongi A. Abidi,et al.  A New Efficient and Direct Solution for Pose Estimation Using Quadrangular Targets: Algorithm and Evaluation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[16]  Stéphane Christy,et al.  Euclidean Reconstruction: From Paraperspective to Perspective , 1996, ECCV.

[17]  Radu Horaud,et al.  An analytic solution for the perspective 4-point problem , 1989, Proceedings CVPR '89: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Geoffrey D. Sullivan,et al.  Model based perspective inversion , 1989, Image Vis. Comput..