Multimodal assessment of visual attention using the Bethesda Eye & Attention Measure (BEAM)

ABSTRACT Introduction: Computerized cognitive tests measuring manual response time (RT) and errors are often used in the assessment of visual attention. Evidence suggests that saccadic RT and errors may also provide valuable information about attention. This study was conducted to examine a novel approach to multimodal assessment of visual attention incorporating concurrent measurements of saccadic eye movements and manual responses. Method: A computerized cognitive task, the Bethesda Eye & Attention Measure (BEAM) v.34, was designed to evaluate key attention networks through concurrent measurement of saccadic and manual RT and inhibition errors. Results from a community sample of n = 54 adults were analyzed to examine effects of BEAM attention cues on manual and saccadic RT and inhibition errors, internal reliability of BEAM metrics, relationships between parallel saccadic and manual metrics, and relationships of BEAM metrics to demographic characteristics. Results: Effects of BEAM attention cues (alerting, orienting, interference, gap, and no-go signals) were consistent with previous literature examining key attention processes. However, corresponding saccadic and manual measurements were weakly related to each other, and only manual measurements were related to estimated verbal intelligence or years of education. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the feasibility of multimodal assessment of visual attention using the BEAM. Results suggest that BEAM saccadic and manual metrics provide divergent measurements. Additional research will be needed to obtain comprehensive normative data, to cross-validate BEAM measurements with other indicators of neural and cognitive function, and to evaluate the utility of these metrics within clinical populations of interest.

[1]  S. Hutton.  Cognitive control of saccadic eye movements , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  M. Posner,et al.  Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  M F Land,et al.  The knowledge base of the oculomotor system. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Orienting of attention and eye movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  S. Hutton,et al.  The antisaccade task as a research tool in psychopathology: a critical review. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Y Agid,et al.  Cortical control of reflexive visually-guided saccades. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  R. Ratcliff.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  B. Turetsky,et al.  Visual attention circuitry in schizophrenia investigated with oddball event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  C. Hinkin,et al.  Reaction time slowing in adults with HIV: Results of a meta-analysis using brinley plots , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  J. Lani,et al.  Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CPT II) , 2002 .

[12]  B. Fischer,et al.  Gap duration and location of attention focus modulate the occurrence of left/right asymmetries in the saccadic reaction times of human subjects , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  Pío Tudela,et al.  Modulations among the alerting, orienting and executive control networks , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual Attention: Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down , 2004, Current Biology.

[16]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study , 2001 .

[17]  B. Christensen,et al.  Measuring premorbid IQ in traumatic brain injury: An examination of the validity of the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading (WTAR) , 2008, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[18]  Daniel Cavegn.  Bilateral interactions in saccade programming , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  T. Schenk,et al.  The Premotor theory of attention: Time to move on? , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Jos J. Adam,et al.  Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  L. Greenberg,et al.  Professional Manual Test Of Variables of Attention Continuous Performance Test , 2008 .

[23]  B. Breitmeyer,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  H. Deubel,et al.  Dual-tasking: Is manual tapping independent of concurrently executed saccades? , 2009, Brain Research.

[25]  Richard T. Marrocco,et al.  Arousal systems , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: evidence from a response inhibition task , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Luis J. Fuentes,et al.  The time course of alerting effect over orienting in the attention network test , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  M. Posner.  Measuring Alertness , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Klein,et al.  Appraising the ANT: Psychometric and theoretical considerations of the Attention Network Test. , 2010, Neuropsychology.

[32]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Attention: Object-Based Selection of a Region in Space , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[34]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[35]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  Repeated Measurement of the Components of Attention of Older Adults using the Two Versions of the Attention Network Test: Stability, Isolability, Robustness, and Reliability , 2011, Front. Ag. Neurosci..

[36]  J. Wijnen,et al.  Response inhibition in motor and oculomotor conflict tasks: Different mechanisms, different dynamics? , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[37]  M. Castro-Alamancos,et al.  Neocortex network activation and deactivation states controlled by the thalamus. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  D. Streiner.  Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency , 2003, Journal of personality assessment.

[39]  C. Klein,et al.  Cognitive correlates of anti-saccade task performance , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  Jin Fan,et al.  Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  D. Munoz,et al.  Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[42]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  Interpreting Reaction Time Measures in Between-Group Comparisons , 2002, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[43]  Jens Schwarzbach,et al.  Control of object-based attention in human cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Philip A. Vernon,et al.  Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research , 2008 .

[45]  B Fischer,et al.  The preparation of visually guided saccades. , 1987, Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology.

[46]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[47]  C. Huang-Pollock,et al.  Evaluating vigilance deficits in ADHD: a meta-analysis of CPT performance. , 2012, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[48]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Influence of removal of invisible fixation on the saccadic and manual gap effect , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[49]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Duncan.  Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[51]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  B. Fischer.  The role of attention in the preparation of visually guided eye movements in monkey and man , 1986, Psychological research.

[53]  C. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  The Prefrontal Substrate of Reflexive Saccade Inhibition in Humans , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[54]  M. Corbetta,et al.  An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Orienting of Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  I. Deary,et al.  Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood: results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[56]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Intra-individual variability in behavior: links to brain structure, neurotransmission and neuronal activity , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[57]  M. Davidson,et al.  Local infusion of scopolamine into intraparietal cortex slows covert orienting in rhesus monkeys. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[58]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Cue validity modulates the neural correlates of covert endogenous orienting of attention in parietal and frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[59]  S. Courtney,et al.  Deconstructing spatial working memory and attention deficits in multiple sclerosis. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[60]  Jin Fan,et al.  The activation of attentional networks , 2005, NeuroImage.

[61]  Stewart H. Mostofsky,et al.  Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements , 1993, Neurology.

[63]  H. Levin,et al.  Cognitive Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury , 2009, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[64]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  The three-loop model: a neural network for the generation of saccadic reaction times , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[65]  Richard D. Jones,et al.  Impaired eye movements in post-concussion syndrome indicate suboptimal brain function beyond the influence of depression, malingering or intellectual ability. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[66]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing , 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[67]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[69]  Grant L Iverson,et al.  To err is human: "abnormal" neuropsychological scores and variability are common in healthy adults. , 2009, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[70]  R. Klein,et al.  A review of the evidence for a disengage deficit following parietal lobe damage , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[71]  C. Rorden,et al.  Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions , 2008, Brain Research.

[72]  R. W. Kentridge,et al.  Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  Thomas S. Redick,et al.  Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[74]  S. Langenecker,et al.  Factor structure, construct validity, and age- and education-based normative data for the Parametric Go/No-Go Test , 2013, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[75]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[76]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Response Anticipation and Response Conflict: An Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.