Comparison of Flat SOM with Spherical SOM. A Case Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Recently, several spherical self-organizing topographic maps have been introduced in the literature [1-4]. The maps are spherical or toroidal, and thus not bounded, as in the case of e.g. the traditional SOM algorithm and its many versions [5,6], and thus should not suffer from the border effect (border neurons are surrounded by less neurons). The emergence of these spherical maps raises a number of questions. Perhaps one of the most significant one is simply what advantage can one expect to gain from them as opposed to the traditional flat map model? To pursue a satisfactory answer to this fundamental question, the authors aim for a detailed comparison of models through visual and numerical analysis of a case study.
[1] Marc M. Van Hulle,et al. Faithful Representations and Topographic Maps: From Distortion- to Information-Based Self-Organization , 2000 .
[2] H. Ritter. Self-Organizing Maps on non-euclidean Spaces , 1999 .
[3] Robert Tibshirani,et al. Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .
[4] Teuvo Kohonen,et al. Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .