Measuring the impacts of connected vehicles on travel time reliability in a work zone environment: an agent-based approach

Abstract The continuous advancement of connected vehicle (CV) technologies and its increasing market penetration (MP) will change the nature of traffic flow fundamentals by upending the traditional traffic composition. The objective of this paper is to create an agent-based modeling framework to evaluate the impact of the vehicle to vehicle (V2V) and vehicle to infrastructure (V2I) technology on the mobility performance (i.e., travel time and its reliability) of a two-lane highway work zone scenario. This paper studies when and at what MP will the mobility benefits of connected vehicles emerge. Results showed that the mobility benefits are highly dependent on the CVs MP levels and traffic flow rates. In addition, the study found that the higher the traffic flow rate is, the higher MP level is required to enable the mobility benefits in the mixed traffic environment. Research findings will inform agency professionals, traffic engineers, and planners the achievable benefits that could accompany the implementation of CV technologies in diverse roadway settings such as work zone. Moreover, the results will help the decision-makers in agencies as state DOTs to develop effective resource allocation strategies and evaluate the cost and benefit ratio of deploying this technology in highway work zone scenario.

[1]  Robert L. Bertini,et al.  Inventory of connected vehicle applications as part of preparing a possible Oregon road map for connected vehicle/cooperative systems deployment scenarios : task 3 report. , 2016 .

[2]  Saiedeh Razavi,et al.  Impact of Connected Vehicle on Work Zone Network Safety through Dynamic Route Guidance , 2016 .

[3]  Heidrun Belzner,et al.  A New Measure of Travel Time Reliability for In-Vehicle Navigation Systems , 2008, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[4]  M. Imran Hayee,et al.  Development of a low-cost interface between cell phone and DSRC-based vehicle unit for efficient use of IntelliDrive infrastructure , 2010 .

[5]  Gang-Len Chang,et al.  Exploring the Effectiveness of Variable Speed Limit Controls on Highway Work-Zone Operations , 2004, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[6]  Raja Sengupta,et al.  Effects of vehicle-vehicle/roadside-vehicle communication on adaptive cruise controlled highway systems , 2002, Proceedings IEEE 56th Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  Microscopic Estimation of Freeway Vehicle Positions From the Behavior of Connected Vehicles , 2014, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[8]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Lane-Changing Model with Explicit Target Lane Choice , 2005 .

[9]  Andreas Tapani,et al.  Bottleneck mitigation through a variable speed limit system using connected vehicles , 2018, Transportmetrica A: Transport Science.

[10]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[11]  Gregory R. Madey,et al.  Verification and Validation of Agent-based Scientific Simulation Models , 2005 .

[12]  Sherif Ishak,et al.  Operational Assessment of Joint and Conventional Lane Merge Configurations for Freeway Work Zones , 2013, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[13]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[14]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  Volker Grimm,et al.  VISUAL DEBUGGING: A WAY OF ANALYZING, UNDERSTANDING AND COMMUNICATING BOTTOM‐UP SIMULATION MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[16]  Shannon R. Bowling,et al.  A Progressive Deployment Strategy for Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control to Improve Traffic Dynamics , 2014, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[17]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Driver Acceptance of Following Gap Settings Less than One Second , 2010 .

[18]  Steven E. Shladover,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems on Highway Traffic Flow Capacity , 2002 .

[19]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Jia Li,et al.  A Methodology to Estimate Capacity Impact due to Connected Vehicle Technology , 2012 .

[21]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Travel-Time Reliability as a Measure of Service , 2003 .

[22]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  String-Stable CACC Design and Experimental Validation: A Frequency-Domain Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[23]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  A Primer on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Performance Measurement , 2011 .

[24]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Assessing the Potential Impacts of Connected Vehicles: Mobility, Environmental, and Safety Perspectives , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[25]  Harith Abdulsattar,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment of Work Zone Rear-End Collisions in a Connected Vehicle Environment: Agent-Based Modeling Framework , 2018, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems.

[26]  Han-Shue Tan,et al.  Design and field testing of a Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control system , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[27]  Greg Hatcher,et al.  Estimated Benefits of Connected Vehicle Applications: Dynamic Mobility Applications, AERIS, V2I Safety, and Road Weather Management Applications , 2015 .

[28]  Byungkyu Park,et al.  Assessment of mobility, energy, and environment impacts of IntelliDrive-based Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control and Intelligent Traffic Signal control , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology.

[29]  D. Gazis,et al.  Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow , 1961 .

[30]  Haizhong Wang,et al.  Percolation phenomenon in connected vehicle network through a multi-agent approach: Mobility benefits and market penetration , 2017 .

[31]  Baher Abdulhai,et al.  Traffic capacity implications of automated vehicles mixed with regular vehicles , 2018, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[32]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  COOPERATIVE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (CACC) DEFINITIONS AND OPERATING CONCEPTS , 2015 .

[33]  Hussein Dia,et al.  An agent-based approach to modelling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information , 2002 .

[34]  Thomas W. Lucas,et al.  Exploring the world of agent-based simulations: simple models, complex analyses , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[35]  M. Steinbuch,et al.  Explicit MPC design and performance-based tuning of an Adaptive Cruise Control Stop-&-Go , 2008, 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[36]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Neural Network-Wavelet Microsimulation Model for Delay and Queue Length Estimation at Freeway Work Zones , 2006 .

[37]  Shannon R. Bowling,et al.  Towards reducing traffic congestion using cooperative adaptive cruise control on a freeway with a ramp , 2011 .

[38]  Hesham A. Rakha,et al.  A study of the environmental impacts of intelligent automated vehicle control at intersections via V2V and V2I communications , 2019, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[39]  Brian H. Philips,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Critical Human Factors Issues and Research Questions , 2017 .