Aalborg Universitet Development and functional demonstration of a wireless intraoral inductive tongue computer interface for severely disabled persons Struijk

Purpose: Individuals with tetraplegia depend on alternative interfaces in order to control computers and other electronic equipment. Current interfaces are often limited in the number of available control commands, and may compromise the social identity of an individual due to their undesirable appearance. The purpose of this study was to implement an alternative computer interface, which was fully embedded into the oral cavity and which provided multiple control commands. Methods: The development of a wireless, intraoral, inductive tongue computer was described. The interface encompassed a 10-key keypad area and a mouse pad area. This system was embedded wirelessly into the oral cavity of the user. The functionality of the system was demonstrated in two tetraplegic individuals and two able-bodied individuals Results: The system was invisible during use and allowed the user to type on a computer using either the keypad area or the mouse pad. The maximal typing rate was 1.8 s for repetitively typing a correct character with the keypad area and 1.4 s for repetitively typing a correct character with the mouse pad area. Conclusion: The results suggest that this inductive tongue computer interface provides an esthetically acceptable and functionally efficient environmental control for a severely disabled user. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION New Design, Implementation and detection methods for intra oral assistive devices. Demonstration of wireless, powering and encapsulation techniques suitable for intra oral embedment of assistive devices. Demonstration of the functionality of a rechargeable and fully embedded intra oral tongue controlled computer input device. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 17 September 2015 Revised 7 July 2016 Accepted 21 July 2016

[1]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  An Inductive Tongue Computer Interface for Control of Computers and Assistive Devices , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  Clinical evaluation of wireless inductive tongue computer interface for control of computers and assistive devices , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[3]  C Lau,et al.  Comparison of computer interface devices for persons with severe physical disabilities. , 1993, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[4]  T. Falk,et al.  Taking NIRS-BCIs Outside the Lab: Towards Achieving Robustness Against Environment Noise , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  Maysam Ghovanloo,et al.  Qualitative assessment of tongue drive system by people with high-level spinal cord injury. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Héctor A. Caltenco,et al.  Features of cortical neuroplasticity associated with multidirectional novel motor skill training: a TMS mapping study , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Impact of Electronic Aids to Daily Living on the Lives of Persons With Cervical Spinal Cord Injuries , 2005, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[8]  Joan Lobo-Prat,et al.  Non-invasive control interfaces for intention detection in active movement-assistive devices , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  Bo Bentsen,et al.  A framework for mouse and keyboard emulation in a tongue control system , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  M. Franceschini,et al.  Longitudinal outcome 6 years after spinal cord injury , 2003, Spinal Cord.

[11]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tongue-Rudder: A Glossokinetic-Potential-Based Tongue–Machine Interface , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Hector A. Caltenco,et al.  TongueWise: Tongue-computer interface software for people with tetraplegia , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  Xiao Li,et al.  The Vocal Joystick: Evaluation of voice-based cursor control techniques for assistive technology , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[14]  Tom Chau,et al.  A Review of Emerging Access Technologies for Individuals With Severe Motor Impairments , 2008, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[15]  Héctor A. Caltenco,et al.  On the tip of the tongue: learning typing and pointing with an intra-oral computer interface , 2014, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[16]  Héctor A. Caltenco,et al.  Tip of the Tongue Selectivity and Motor Learning in the Palatal Area , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Optically sensing tongue gestures for computer input , 2009, UIST '09.

[18]  R.F. Kirsch,et al.  Evaluation of Head Orientation and Neck Muscle EMG Signals as Command Inputs to a Human–Computer Interface for Individuals With High Tetraplegia , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Dejan B. Popovic,et al.  A novel hand prosthesis control scheme implementing a tongue control system , 2012 .

[20]  Armando Barreto,et al.  Adaptive eye-gaze tracking using neural-network-based user profiles to assist people with motor disability. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  Alternative design of inductive pointing device for oral interface for computers and wheelchairs , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[22]  Arthur Prochazka,et al.  Evaluation of Tooth-Click Triggering and Speech Recognition in Assistive Technology for Computer Access , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Eugen R. Lontis,et al.  Fuzzy inference system for analog joystick emulation with an inductive tongue-computer interface , 2011 .

[24]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  Medical tongue piercing – development and evaluation of a surgical protocol and the perception of procedural discomfort of the participants , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[25]  Eugen R Lontis,et al.  Design of inductive sensors for tongue control system for computers and assistive devices , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[26]  Zhiwei Zhu,et al.  Novel Eye Gaze Tracking Techniques Under Natural Head Movement , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Héctor A. Caltenco,et al.  Understanding Computer Users With Tetraplegia: Survey of Assistive Technology Users , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[28]  J. Ripat,et al.  The role of assistive technology in self-perceived participation , 2012, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[29]  Xueliang Huo,et al.  A Magneto-Inductive Sensor Based Wireless Tongue-Computer Interface , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  Lotte N. S. Andreasen Struijk,et al.  Inductive tongue control of powered wheelchairs , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.