Role of multihospital system membership in electronic medical record adoption.

BACKGROUND Health information technology (HIT) is designed to help reduce medical errors and improve quality of care and efficiency by providing the right information for the right patients in the right place at the right time. Nevertheless, substantial variation currently exists in the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) resulting in differences in hospital HIT capacity. PURPOSE The purpose of this article is to examine the impact of different types of multihospital system affiliation on EMR adoption in hospitals in the United States. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional design was used with a sample of 4,017 hospitals in the United States. Secondary data were retrieved from the Health Information and Management Systems Society Analytics Database. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the impact of multihospital system affiliation on EMR level of adoption. FINDINGS The mean EMR adoption level varies significantly between independent hospitals and hospitals owned by a system for small hospitals. After adjusting for the number of operating rooms, the number of emergency room visits, and the number of hospital total full-time equivalent staff, small hospitals owned by multihospital systems were associated with 0.25 higher mean EMR adoption level (p < .05) than independent hospitals and no significant relationship was observed for hospitals that were leased/managed by a system. There was no significant effect of multihospital system membership on EMR level of adoption for medium and large hospitals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Small hospitals owned by multihospital systems had a significantly higher EMR level compared with independent hospitals. These findings have significant implications for small hospitals that are struggling to improve their HIT capacity. Smaller hospitals in ownership arrangements with larger health care systems have an advantage over small independent hospitals in HIT capacity possibly because of the greater availability of capital, access to shared HIT capacity, and other resources including technical expertise.

[1]  S M Shortell,et al.  A taxonomy of health networks and systems: bringing order out of chaos. , 1999, Health services research.

[2]  J. Kimberly,et al.  Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. , 1981, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[3]  M. Shanley,et al.  Are multihospital systems more efficient? , 1996, Health affairs.

[4]  W Raghupathi,et al.  Strategic uses of information technology in health care: a state-of-the-art survey. , 1999, Topics in health information management.

[5]  Mirou Jaana,et al.  Clinical Information System Availability and Use in Urban and Rural Hospitals , 2006, Journal of Medical Systems.

[6]  Thomas T H Wan,et al.  Factors Influencing Health Information System Adoption in American Hospitals , 2005, Health care management review.

[7]  Sara Rosenbaum,et al.  How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. , 2006, Health affairs.

[8]  G J Kuperman,et al.  A randomized trial of a computer-based intervention to reduce utilization of redundant laboratory tests. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[10]  Mark L. Diana,et al.  Exploring Hospitals' Adoption of Information Technology , 2002, Journal of Medical Systems.

[11]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  Information technologies in Florida's rural hospitals: does system affiliation matter? , 2005, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[12]  Nir Menachemi,et al.  Opening the Black Box: Measuring Hospital Information Technology Capability , 2004, Health care management review.

[13]  The growth of multihospital firms in California. , 2000, Health affairs.

[14]  Guy Paré,et al.  Antecedents of Clinical Information Technology Sophistication in Hospitals , 2006, Health care management review.

[15]  Malcolm T. MacEachern,et al.  Hospital Organization and Management , 1936, Health systems management.

[16]  Guy Paré,et al.  Clinical information technology in hospitals: A comparison between the state of Iowa and two provinces in Canada , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.