Single centre prospective study of the efficacy of percutaneous cement augmentation in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

Abstract Introduction. Despite controversial outcomes of recent published trials, percutaneous cement augmentation remains widely used in managing painful vertebral compression fractures. We prospectively assessed patients with such fractures using an eleven-point visual analogue scale for pain and the Qualeffo 41 questionnaire for quality of life. Methods. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous cement augmentation for painful vertebral compression fractures were recruited. Patients were assessed pre-procedure by completing a visual analogue scale for pain, on a scale of 0 to 10. A Qualeffo 41 questionnaire was also completed. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 3 months. Results. Fifty six patients were prospectively recruited (111 vertebroplasty and 5 kyphoplasty). Visual analogue scores dropped from 6.4 ± 2.3 pre-procedure to 4.0 ± 2.7 at 1 week (p < 0.0001) and 4.3 ± 2.7 (p < 0.0001) at 3 months. Three subgroups were identified; osteoporotic patients (n = 28), a second non-osteoporotic group (n = 20) who had acute fracture following fall and a third group with compression fractures secondary to metastatic disease (n = 8). At 3-month follow-up, patients with osteoporotic fractures had reduction in pain score from 6.3 ± 2.1to 4.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.02). Patients who had traumatic fractures experienced more significant pain relief, 6.4 ± 2.6 to 3.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.0009) but patients with malignant fracture had most benefit, 6.0 ± 3.0 to 1.8 ± 0.8 (p = 0.01). Total Qualeffo scores improved from 63 ± 15 to 49 ± 22 (p < 0.0001). Within the domains of the Qualeffo questionnaire, most improvement was seen in pain and physical function. Median in-patient stay post procedure was one day. Conclusion. In our experience percutaneous cement augmentation is safe and efficacious in the management of painful VCF related to osteoporosis, trauma and cancer, achieving rapid and significant pain reduction and improvement in physical function as measured with a visual analogue scale and the Qualeffo 41 questionnaire.

[1]  L. Saba,et al.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: multi-centric results from EVEREST experience in large cohort of patients. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[2]  M. Ritchie,et al.  A prospective study of percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with myeloma and spinal metastases. , 2011, Clinical radiology.

[3]  T. Mendoza,et al.  Vertebral compression fracture treatment with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: experience in 407 patients with 1,156 fractures in a tertiary cancer center. , 2011, Pain medicine.

[4]  S. Sawada,et al.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic compression fractures: long-term evaluation of the technical and clinical outcomes. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  A. Mpotsaris,et al.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in vertebral compression fractures of benign or malignant origin: a prospective study of 1188 patients with follow-up of 12 months. , 2011, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[6]  J. de Vries,et al.  A randomised sham controlled trial of vertebroplasty for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VERTOS IV) , 2011, Trials.

[7]  K. Schechtman,et al.  Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  S. Boriani,et al.  Vertebroplasty: benefits are more than risks in selected and evidence-based informed patients. A retrospective study of 59 cases , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[9]  Hao-kuang Wang,et al.  Comparing clinical outcomes following percutaneous vertebroplasty with conservative therapy for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. , 2010, Pain medicine.

[10]  J. Vries,et al.  Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[11]  A. Gangi,et al.  Have Recent Vertebroplasty Trials Changed the Indications for Vertebroplasty? , 2010, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[12]  D. Resnick,et al.  North American Spine Society: Newly released vertebroplasty randomized controlled trials: a tale of two trials. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  R. Buchbinder,et al.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  William Hollingworth,et al.  A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  P. Munk,et al.  Trials of vertebroplasty for vertebral fractures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Grey,et al.  Trials of vertebroplasty for vertebral fractures. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  P. Munk,et al.  Effectiveness of Vertebroplasty: A Recent Controversy , 2009, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[18]  Douglas Wardlaw,et al.  Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[19]  J. Eisman,et al.  Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. , 2009, JAMA.

[20]  S. Cummings,et al.  Effi cacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non-surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial , 2009 .

[21]  O. Johnell,et al.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  J. Kanis,et al.  The hospitalisation costs and out-patient costs of fragility fractures , 2006 .

[23]  S. Cho,et al.  Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Compression Fractures , 2002 .

[24]  O. Johnell,et al.  Quality of Life in Patients with Vertebral Fractures: Validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  A. Johansen,et al.  Trauma admissions in the elderly: how does a patient's age affect the likelihood of their being admitted to hospital after a fracture? , 1998, Injury.

[26]  H. Deramond,et al.  [Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebroplasty]. , 1987, Neuro-Chirurgie.