Call-Center Labor Cross-Training: It's a Small World After All

It is well known that flexibility can be created in manufacturing and service operations by using multipurpose production sources such as cross-trained labor, flexible machines, or flexible factories. We focus on flexible service centers, such as inbound call centers with cross-trained agents, and model them as parallel queueing systems with flexible servers. We propose a new approach to analyzing flexibility arising from the multifunctionality of sources of production. We create a work sharing (WS) network model for which its average shortest path length (APL) metric can predict the more effective of two alternative cross-training structures in terms of customer waiting times. We show that the APL metric of small world network (SWN) theory is one simple deterministic solution approach to the complex stochastic problem of designing effective workforce cross-training structures in call centers.

[1]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[2]  Seyed M. R. Iravani,et al.  Optimal dynamic assignment of a flexible worker on an open production line with specialists , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Chained cross-training of workers for robust performance , 2004 .

[4]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[5]  William C. Jordan,et al.  Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility , 1995 .

[6]  Seyed M. R. Iravani,et al.  Structural Flexibility: A New Perspective on the Design of Manufacturing and Service Operations , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Benefits of Skill Chaining in Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers: An Extended Abstract , 2002, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[8]  D. Watts,et al.  Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness , 2001 .

[9]  Saif Benjaafar,et al.  Modeling and analysis of flexible queueing systems , 2004 .

[10]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[11]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[12]  M. Newman,et al.  Small Worlds: The Structure of Social Networks , 1999 .

[13]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Agile workforce evaluation: a framework for cross-training and coordination , 2004 .

[15]  Avishai Mandelbaum,et al.  On Pooling in Queueing Networks , 1998 .

[16]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[17]  John O. McClain,et al.  Management of Worksharing Systems , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[18]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  Machine Sharing in Manufacturing Systems : Flexibility versus Chaining , 1997 .

[19]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Benefits of Skill Chaining in Serial Production Lines with Cross-Trained Workers , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Pooling strategies for call center agent cross-training , 2009 .

[21]  Saifallah Benjaafar,et al.  Machine Sharing in Manufacturing Systems: Total Flexibility versus Chaining , 1998 .

[22]  Stephen C. Graves,et al.  Process Flexibility in Supply Chains , 2003, Manag. Sci..