Positioning error guarantee method with two-stage compensation strategy for aircraft flexible assembly tooling

Abstract Flexible assembly tooling is an important manufacturing equipment for aircraft products, the positioning error of its end locating effectors determines the final assembly precision directly. To realize its accurate positioning, a precise and effective error compensation method based on two-stage strategy, is proposed. Based on the structure and working conditions of locating unit, an assembly measuring field is set up, for acquiring the actual geometric error status and the various time-varying assembly parameters in practical assembly site. Considering the transfer and accumulation of actual geometric error and deformation error, the positioning error mechanism model at the pre-compensation stage is proposed. Then with the actual assembly conditions and the measured training/testing data set of the positioning error, the SLFN motion prediction model for the locating unit is proposed, aiming at clarifying the nonlinear and strong coupling relationship between the input motion value and the output positioning error. And the SLFN data model has a good fitting and prediction ability. Combining the advantages of error mechanism modeling and measurement data modeling, a semi-mechanism model is proposed at the accurate compensation stage. Where the positioning error is predicted with SLFN model for a given input motion value, acting as an error generator. Experiment results showed that the final measured average error is 0.036 mm, having an enhancement ratio of 25.77 % contrasting with the error mechanism model. This accurate modification and compensation solution makes the relationship between causal factors and output positioning error more comprehensive, and the overall effect is more consistent with the practical situation, i.e. a higher precision value and an accurate input/output relationship can be gained.

[1]  Serge Samper,et al.  On the role of form defects in assemblies subject to local deformations and mechanical loads , 2012, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[2]  J. J. Aguilar,et al.  Improving a real milling machine accuracy through an indirect measurement of its geometric errors , 2016 .

[3]  Fei Tao,et al.  Make more digital twins , 2019, Nature.

[4]  Ke Xu,et al.  A time-varying geometry modeling method for parts with deformation during machining process , 2020 .

[5]  Otto Jan Bakker,et al.  Variation analysis of automated wing box assembly , 2017 .

[6]  P. G. Maropoulos,et al.  Methodology for High Accuracy Installation of Sustainable Jigs and Fixtures , 2011 .

[7]  Ilian A. Bonev,et al.  Absolute calibration of an ABB IRB 1600 robot using a laser tracker , 2013 .

[8]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Generalizing periodically time-varying measurements with a parameter-varying input-output model , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC) Proceedings.

[9]  Jeffrey H. Hunt,et al.  Feasibility analysis of composite fuselage shape control via finite element analysis , 2018 .

[10]  Michael F. Zaeh,et al.  Tolerance analysis of compliant, feature-based sheet metal structures for fixtureless assembly , 2018 .

[11]  Harald Meerkamm,et al.  ENHANCEMENT IN COUPLING TOLERANCE ANALYSIS AND ELASTIC DEFORMATIONS ON THE EXAMPLE OF A SERIAL LINEAR SUPPORT SYSTEM , 2005 .

[12]  Matthias Putz,et al.  Force-controlled Adjustment of Car Body Fixtures – Verification and Performance of the New Approach , 2016 .

[13]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin , 2019 .

[14]  Dan Zhao,et al.  Kinematic modeling and base frame calibration of a dual-machine-based drilling and riveting system for aircraft panel assembly , 2018 .

[15]  Xi-Ning Li,et al.  Flexible tooling design technology for aircraft fuselage panel component pre-assembly , 2015 .

[16]  T. Narendra Reddy,et al.  Real-time Positioning Error Compensation for a Turning Machine Using Neural Network , 2014 .

[17]  Enrico Vezzetti,et al.  Resistance spot welding process simulation for variational analysis on compliant assemblies , 2015 .

[18]  Dávid Gyulai,et al.  Joint optimization of product tolerance design, process plan, and production plan in high-precision multi-product assembly , 2020, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[19]  Chao Lin,et al.  The Bond Graph Method for Analysis of the Micro-Motion Characteristics of a Micro Gripper , 2016 .

[20]  Ola Andersson,et al.  Quality modeling case study at GKN Aerospace Sweden , 2015 .

[21]  Ronay Ak,et al.  A Survey of the Advancing Use and Development of Machine Learning in Smart Manufacturing. , 2018, Journal of manufacturing systems.

[22]  Teddy Mantoro,et al.  Extreme learning machine for user location prediction in mobile environment , 2011, Int. J. Pervasive Comput. Commun..

[23]  Kornel Ehmann,et al.  Volumetric Error Analysis of a Stewart Platform-Based Machine Tool , 1997 .

[24]  Li Cong,et al.  Locating Datum Modeling for Minimum Normal Error in Aircraft Digital Assembly System , 2015 .

[25]  Khumbulani Mpofu,et al.  Design, simulation and experimental investigation of a novel reconfigurable assembly fixture for press brakes , 2016 .

[26]  Branko Tadic,et al.  Locating and clamping of complex geometry workpieces with skewed holes in multiple-constraint conditions , 2013 .

[27]  Lianyu Zheng,et al.  An automated reconfigurable flexible fixture for aerospace pipeline assembly before welding , 2018 .

[28]  Jian Zhou,et al.  A calibration method for enhancing robot accuracy through integration of an extended Kalman filter algorithm and an artificial neural network , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[29]  Aun-Neow Poo,et al.  Error compensation in machine tools — a review: Part I: geometric, cutting-force induced and fixture-dependent errors , 2000 .

[30]  Jody Muelaner,et al.  A new paradigm in large-scale assembly—research priorities in measurement assisted assembly , 2014 .

[31]  Tian Huang,et al.  A general approach for error modeling of machine tools , 2014 .

[32]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Learning in the machine: The symmetries of the deep learning channel , 2017, Neural Networks.

[33]  Joe Cecil,et al.  An integrated methodology for fixture design , 1996, J. Intell. Manuf..

[34]  Xin Jin,et al.  A macro–micro compensation method for straightness motion error and positioning error of an improved linear stage , 2015 .

[35]  Rebeca Arista,et al.  Flexible Best Fit Assembly of Large Aircraft Components. Airbus A350 XWB Case Study , 2017, PLM.

[36]  Dariusz Ceglarek,et al.  Impact of fixture design on sheet metal assembly variation , 2004 .

[37]  Henrik Kihlman,et al.  Development of Automated Flexible Tooling as Enabler in Wing Box Assembly , 2016 .

[38]  Jindong Wang,et al.  The technical method of geometric error measurement for multi-axis NC machine tool by laser tracker , 2012 .

[39]  Jianhua Liu,et al.  Working mode in aircraft manufacturing based on digital coordination model , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[40]  Fang Zou,et al.  Locating method and motion stroke design of flexible assembly tooling for multiple aircraft components , 2020 .

[41]  Sandro Wartzack,et al.  How to determine the influence of geometric deviations on elastic deformations and the structural performance? , 2013 .

[42]  Steven L. Brunton,et al.  Predicting shim gaps in aircraft assembly with machine learning and sparse sensing , 2017, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.