Evaluation of Automatic Measurement of the Intracranial Volume Based on Quantitative MR Imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Brain size is commonly described in relation to ICV, whereby accurate assessment of this quantity is fundamental. Recently, an optimized MR sequence (QRAPMASTER) was developed for simultaneous quantification of T1, T2, and proton density. ICV can be measured automatically within minutes from QRAPMASTER outputs and a dedicated software, SyMRI. Automatic estimations of ICV were evaluated against the manual segmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 19 healthy subjects, manual segmentation of ICV was performed by 2 neuroradiologists (Obs1, Obs2) by using QBrain software and conventional T2-weighted images. The automatic segmentation from the QRAPMASTER output was performed by using SyMRI. Manual corrections of the automatic segmentation were performed (corrected-automatic) by Obs1 and Obs2, who were blinded from each other. Finally, the repeatability of the automatic method was evaluated in 6 additional healthy subjects, each having 6 repeated QRAPMASTER scans. The time required to measure ICV was recorded. RESULTS: No significant difference was found between reference and automatic (and corrected-automatic) ICV (P > .25). The mean difference between the reference and automatic measurement was −4.84 ± 19.57 mL (or 0.31 ± 1.35%). Mean differences between the reference and the corrected-automatic measurements were −0.47 ± 17.95 mL (−0.01 ± 1.24%) and −1.26 ± 17.68 mL (−0.06 ± 1.22%) for Obs1 and Obs2, respectively. The repeatability errors of the automatic and the corrected-automatic method were <1%. The automatic method required 1 minute 11 seconds (SD = 12 seconds) of processing. Adding manual corrections required another 1 minute 32 seconds (SD = 38 seconds). CONCLUSIONS: Automatic and corrected-automatic quantification of ICV showed good agreement with the reference method. SyMRI software provided a fast and reproducible measure of ICV.

[1]  J. Brewer,et al.  Fully-Automated Quantification of Regional Brain Volumes for Improved Detection of Focal Atrophy in Alzheimer Disease , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  Peter Lundberg,et al.  Segmentation and Volume Estimation on a Sub-voxel Basis using Quantitative MR : A Validation Study , 2010 .

[3]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: Optimization for clinical usage , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Andrew Riddehough,et al.  Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Changes Correlate in a Clinical Trial Monitoring Cyclosporine Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis , 1997, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[5]  Marvin Bergsneider,et al.  Diagnosing Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[6]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Hippocampal atrophy rates in Alzheimer disease , 2009, Neurology.

[7]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Comparative Reliability of Total Intracranial Volume Estimation Methods and the Influence of Atrophy in a Longitudinal Semantic Dementia Cohort , 2009, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[9]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  MRI-derived measurements of human subcortical, ventricular and intracranial brain volumes: Reliability effects of scan sessions, acquisition sequences, data analyses, scanner upgrade, scanner vendors and field strengths , 2009, NeuroImage.

[10]  Faiza Admiraal-Behloul,et al.  Ventricular dilation: Association with gait and cognition , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[11]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI , 2012, European Radiology.

[12]  Jane S. Paulsen,et al.  Smaller intracranial volume in prodromal Huntington's disease: evidence for abnormal neurodevelopment. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  L. Westlye,et al.  Mini-Mental State Examination Is Sensitive to Brain Atrophy in Alzheimer’s Disease , 2009, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[14]  B T Hyman,et al.  Temporoparietal MR Imaging Measures of Atrophy in Subjects with Mild Cognitive Impairment That Predict Subsequent Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[15]  C. Jack,et al.  Brain beta-amyloid measures and magnetic resonance imaging atrophy both predict time-to-progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Novel method for rapid, simultaneous T1, T*2, and proton density quantification , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Unified segmentation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  Joseph V. Hajnal,et al.  A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T) , 2010, NeuroImage.

[19]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Hanna Israelsson,et al.  Brain Ventricular Size in Healthy Elderly: Comparison Between Evans Index and Volume Measurement , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[21]  L. McEvoy,et al.  Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers , 2011, Neurology.

[22]  Marc Modat,et al.  Atrophy patterns in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: A comparison of FreeSurfer and manual volumetric measurements , 2010, NeuroImage.

[23]  A. Wåhlin,et al.  MR Imaging of Brain Volumes: Evaluation of a Fully Automatic Software , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.