Evaluation of Three In-Vehicle Interactions from Drivers' Driving Performance and Eye Movement behavior

Although in-vehicle interaction technologies offer assistances for drivers from multi-aspects, the distractions that may cause by these technologies would significantly challenge driving safety. This study examined the influences of three in-vehicle interactions on drivers' driving performance and eye movement behavior. The three in-vehicle interactions include phone pick-up (PPU), Bluetooth and audio $(\mathbf{BT}+\mathbf{AUD})$ and Bluetooth and head-up display $(\mathbf{BT}+\mathbf{HUD})$. A control group (i.e., None, in which no human-machine interaction was included while driving) was designed to highlight the influences of the examined interactions. Fourteen licensed drivers participated in the simulation experiments. Their age ranged from 20 to 30 years old $(\mathbf{Mean}\pm \mathbf{SD}=25.1\pm 3.8)$. They were required to complete the Location Based Service (LBS) tasks using the three interactions while driving. Both driving performance and eye movement data were collected for analysis. Results showed that, when using PPU or $\mathbf{BT}+\mathbf{HUD}$, the minimum throttle opening, the steering wheel angle (SWA) and the Shannon entropy (SE) of SWA were all greater than those values when using $\mathbf{BT}+\mathbf{AUD}$ or None. As for the SE of throttle opening and all the examined eye movement features (frequency and duration of fixation/saccade), the values when using $\mathbf{BT}+\mathbf{AUD}$ or $\mathbf{BT}+\mathbf{HUD}$ were higher than the values when using PPU or None. The presented results in this study provide evidences for car manufactures to design better $\mathbf{BT} +\mathbf{AUD}$ human-machine interaction systems as a priority strategy.

[1]  Jeff K Caird,et al.  A meta-analysis of in-vehicle and nomadic voice-recognition system interaction and driving performance. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Ying Wang,et al.  Detection of Driver Cognitive Distraction: A Comparison Study of Stop-Controlled Intersection and Speed-Limited Highway , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Yuan Wang,et al.  Examining drivers' eye glance patterns during distracted driving: Insights from scanning randomness and glance transition matrix. , 2017, Journal of safety research.

[4]  S. Eben Li,et al.  Field operational test of advanced driver assistance systems in typical Chinese road conditions: The influence of driver gender, age and aggression , 2015 .

[5]  Sheila G Klauer,et al.  Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors. , 2017, Journal of safety research.

[6]  Ying Wang,et al.  The sensitivity of different methodologies for characterizing drivers’ gaze concentration under increased cognitive demand , 2014, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[7]  Gary E. Burnett,et al.  The Effects of Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays on Drivers' Eye Scan Patterns, Performance, and Perceptions , 2017, Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Peter Bengtsson,et al.  A comparison of two contemporary types of in-car multifunctional interfaces. , 2012, Applied ergonomics.

[9]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  Accident Analysis and Prevention , 2009 .

[10]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Fang Chen,et al.  Driving Maneuvers Analysis Using Naturalistic Highway Driving Data , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  Bo Cheng,et al.  Estimation of driving style in naturalistic highway traffic using maneuver transition probabilities , 2017 .

[13]  John D Lee,et al.  Combining cognitive and visual distraction: less than the sum of its parts. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Timothy L. Brown,et al.  Speech-Based Interaction with In-Vehicle Computers: The Effect of Speech-Based E-Mail on Drivers' Attention to the Roadway , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[15]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  Address Entry While Driving: Speech Recognition Versus a Touch-Screen Keyboard , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Johan Engström,et al.  Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty , 2005 .

[17]  Pontus Larsson,et al.  Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human–Machine Interfaces , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Fang Chen,et al.  Lane change maneuver recognition via vehicle state and driver operation signals — Results from naturalistic driving data , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[19]  Moshe Eizenman,et al.  An on-road assessment of cognitive distraction: impacts on drivers' visual behavior and braking performance. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Mark J.M. Sullman,et al.  Driving distractions: An insight gained from roadside interviews on their prevalence and factors associated with driver distraction , 2017 .

[21]  Cory Siebe,et al.  Distracted Driving and Risk of Road Crashes among Novice and Experienced Drivers , 2014 .

[22]  David G. Kidd,et al.  Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems , 2016, Ergonomics.

[23]  J He,et al.  Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry? , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Guofa Li,et al.  Effectiveness of Flashing Brake and Hazard Systems in Avoiding Rear-End Crashes , 2014 .