Body size distributions of large Costa Rican dry forest moths and the underlying relationship between plant and pollinator morphology

There has been much recent interest in explaining patterns of body size variation within species assemblages. One observation is that frequency distributions of species' body size commonly exhibit a right-skew, even on a logarithmic scale. Here we examine the species' body size distributions in two assemblages of large Costa Rican moths. We find that neither adult Sphingidae or Saturniidae exhibit the classic log right-skewed pattern. Furthermore, the species' body size distributions in these two groups are markedly different, which we suggest is a result of differential selective pressures related to resource and mate acquisition. For Sphingidae, we show (I) that body size is positively correlated with tongue length, and (2) that the distribution of sphingid body sizes/tongue lengths closely matches the distribution of flower corolla tube depths in sphingid-pollinated plants. Thus, morphological fitting between plants and pollinators seems to underlie the species' body size distribution of this sphingid assemblage. We discuss the significance of these results in the context of current theory on mechanisms driving species' body size distributions. Finally, we present an evolutionary hypothesis for the diversity of body sizes seen in this sphingid assemblage related to reciprocal interactions between plants and pollinators. This hypothesis can be tested within a rigorous phylogenetic framework, although a systematic phylogenetic analysis of Neotropical Sphingidae does not currently exist.

[1]  W. Haber,et al.  A tropical hawkmoth community: Costa Rican dry forest Sphingidae , 1989 .

[2]  S. Corbet Butterfly nectaring flowers: butterfly morphology and flower form , 2000 .

[3]  K. Gaston,et al.  The animal species–body size distribution of Marion Island , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  V. Polo,et al.  Shaping the body mass distribution of Passeriformes: habitat use and body mass are evolutionarily and ecologically related , 1999 .

[5]  Lawrence D. Harder,et al.  Morphology as a Predictor of Flower Choice by Bumble Bees , 1985 .

[6]  Jan Kozłowski,et al.  Why are species’ body size distributions usually skewed to the right? , 2002 .

[7]  D. Janzen,et al.  How polyphagous are Costa Rican dry forest saturniid caterpillars , 2003 .

[8]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution , 1988, Journal of Paleontology.

[9]  C. S. Holling Cross-Scale Morphology, Geometry, and Dynamics of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[10]  É. Randrianjohany,et al.  Monophily and pollination mechanisms in Angraecum arachnites Schltr. (Orchidaceae) in a guild of long-tongued hawk-moths (Sphingidae) in Madagascar , 1985 .

[11]  É. Randrianjohany,et al.  Angraecoid orchids and hawkmothe in central Madagascar: specialized pollination systems and generalist foragers , 1987 .

[12]  James H. Brown,et al.  Correlates and Consequences of Body Size in Nectar-Feeding Birds , 1978 .

[13]  Darwin's Hummingbirds , 2003, Science.

[14]  J. Lawton,et al.  Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths , 1985, Nature.

[15]  L. Nilsson,et al.  The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes , 1988, Nature.

[16]  Kamaljit S. Bawa,et al.  Plant-Pollinator Interactions in Tropical Rain Forests , 1990 .

[17]  F. Gill Ecological fitting: use of floral nectar in Heliconia stilesii Daniels by three species of hermit hummingbirds , 1987 .

[18]  Y. Winter,et al.  Energetic cost of hovering flight in nectar-feeding bats (Phyllostomidae: Glossophaginae) and its scaling in moths, birds and bats , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[19]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  A Theoretical Ecological Model of Size Distributions Among Species of Animals , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[20]  D. Janzen On Ecological Fitting , 1985 .

[21]  K. Dial,et al.  Are the Smallest Organisms the Most Diverse , 1988 .

[22]  K. Grant,et al.  Hawkmoth pollination of Mirabilis longiflora (Nyctaginaceae). , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  H. Hespenheide Ecological Inferences From Morphological Data , 1973 .

[24]  D. Janzen WHEN IS IT COEVOLUTION? , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  S. Stanley,et al.  AN EXPLANATION FOR COPE'S RULE , 1973, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  L. Harder Flower handling efficiency of bumble bees: morphological aspects of probing time , 1983, Oecologia.

[27]  James H. Brown,et al.  ORGANIZATION OF A TROPICAL ISLAND COMMUNITY OF HUMMINGBIRDS AND FLOWERS , 1984 .

[28]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Hawk‐moth scale analysis and pollination specialization in the epilithic Malagasy endemic Aerangis ellisii (Reichenb. fil.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae) , 1988 .

[29]  Thomas . Belt The naturalist in Nicaragua , 1874 .

[30]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Physiological Ecology of Vertebrates: A View from Energetics , 2002 .

[31]  Does Body Size Optimization Result in Skewed Body Size Distribution on a Logarithmic Scale? , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[32]  M. Taper,et al.  Evolution of Body Size: Consequences of an Energetic Definition of Fitness , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[33]  N. Stork,et al.  Species number, species abundance and body length relationships of arboreal beetles in Bornean lowland rain forest trees , 1988 .

[34]  Russell B. Miller HAWKMOTHS AND THE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF FLORAL VARIATION IN AQUILEGIA CAERULEA , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  Robert M. May,et al.  How Many Species Are There on Earth? , 1988, Science.

[36]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[37]  T. Casey,et al.  Flight energetics of sphinx moths: power input during hovering flight. , 1976, The Journal of experimental biology.

[38]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[39]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[40]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[41]  D. Eisikowitch,et al.  EFFECT OF WIND ON THE POLLINATION OF PANCRATIUM MARITIMUM L. (AMARYLLIDACEAE) BY HAWKMOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: SPHINGIDAE) , 1971 .

[42]  W. Haber Pollination by Deceit in a Mass-Flowering Tropical Tree Plumeria rubra L. (Apocynaceae) , 1984 .

[43]  K. Gaston,et al.  The species–body size distribution: energy, fitness and optimality , 1997 .

[44]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[45]  Robert M. May,et al.  The Search for Patterns in the Balance of Nature: Advances and Retreats , 1986 .

[46]  L. Page,et al.  The Evolution of Body Size in Extant Groups of North American Freshwater Fishes: Speciation, Size Distributions, and Cope’s Rule , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[47]  A. Dixon,et al.  Body size distribution in aphids: relative surface area of specific plant structures , 1995 .

[48]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom , 1972 .

[49]  C. Fenster Selection on floral morphology by hummingbirds , 1991 .

[50]  J. da Silva,et al.  Diversity in Relation to Body Size in Mammals: A Comparative Study , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[51]  Arthur E. Dunham,et al.  Historical perspectives in ecology and evolutionary biology: the use of phylogenetic comparative analyses , 1993 .

[52]  R. Lande,et al.  Models of Coevolution and Speciation in Plants and Their Pollinators , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[53]  D. Janzen Ecological Characterization of a Costa Rican Dry Forest Caterpillar Fauna , 1988 .

[54]  K. Gaston,et al.  On being the right size: Different definitions of 'right' , 1996 .

[55]  S. Johnson,et al.  LONG‐TONGUED FLY POLLINATION AND EVOLUTION OF FLORAL SPUR LENGTH IN THE DISA DRACONIS COMPLEX (ORCHIDACEAE) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[56]  D. Janzen Costa Rica's Area de Conservación Guanacaste: A long march to survival through non-damaging biodevelopment , 2000 .

[57]  S. Johnson,et al.  Pollinator–mediated selection on flower–tube length in a hawkmoth–pollinated Gladiolus (Iridaceae) , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  Deep flowers for long tongues. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[59]  T. Casey,et al.  OXYGEN CONSUMPTION OF MOTHS DURING REST, PRE-FLIGHT WARM-UP, AND FLIGHT IN RELATION TO BODY SIZE AND WING MORPHOLOGY , 1978 .

[60]  L. Holdridge,et al.  Forest environments in tropical life zones: a pilot study. , 1971 .

[61]  James H. Brown,et al.  THE MICRO AND MACRO IN BODY SIZE EVOLUTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[62]  R. Wyatt,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR POLLINATION ECOTYPES IN THE YELLOW‐FRINGED ORCHID, PLATANTHERA CILIARIS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[63]  Daniel R. Brooks,et al.  The Nature of Diversity: An Evolutionary Voyage of Discovery , 2002 .

[64]  W. Calder Size, Function, and Life History , 1988 .

[65]  S. Morand,et al.  Parasite body size distributions: interpreting patterns of skewness. , 1997, International journal for parasitology.

[66]  J. Weiner,et al.  Interspecific Allometries Are by-Products of Body Size Optimization , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[67]  A. Dixon,et al.  BODY SIZE DISTRIBUTION IN PREDATORY LADYBIRD BEETLES REFLECTS THAT OF THEIR PREY , 2001 .

[68]  W. Kress,et al.  Adaptation in a Plant-Hummingbird Association , 2003, Science.

[69]  L. L. Wolf,et al.  Energetics of Foraging: Rate and Efficiency of Nectar Extraction by Hummingbirds , 1972, Science.

[70]  D. Janzen Caterpillar Seasonality in a Costa Rican Dry Forest , 1993 .