Enhancing structural diversity in social networks by recommending weak ties

Contact recommendation has become a common functionality in online social platforms, and an established research topic in the social networks and recommender systems fields. Predicting and recommending links has been mainly addressed to date as an accuracy-targeting problem. In this paper we put forward a different perspective, considering that correctly predicted links may not be all equally valuable. Contact recommendation brings an opportunity to drive the structural evolution of a social network towards desirable properties of the network as a whole, beyond the sum of the isolated gains for the individual users to whom recommendations are delivered -global properties that we may want to assess and promote as explicit recommendation targets. In this perspective, we research the definition of relevant diversity metrics drawing from social network analysis concepts, and linking to prior diversity notions in recommender systems. In particular, we elaborate on the notion of weak tie recommendation as a means to enhance the structural diversity of networks. In order to show the signification of the proposed metrics, we report experiments with Twitter data illustrating how state of the art contact recommendation methods compare in terms of our metrics; we examine the tradeoff with accuracy, and we show that diverse link recommendations result in a corresponding diversity enhancement in the flow of information through the network, with potential implications in mitigating filter bubbles.

[1]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  On Unexpectedness in Recommender Systems , 2013, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[2]  Linyuan Lu,et al.  Link Prediction in Complex Networks: A Survey , 2010, ArXiv.

[3]  Pablo Castells,et al.  Contact Recommendations in Social Networks , 2018, Collaborative Recommendations.

[4]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[5]  Yifan Hu,et al.  Collaborative Filtering for Implicit Feedback Datasets , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[6]  Saul Vargas,et al.  Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems , 2015, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[7]  Lorraine R. Goodleman MAKE NEW FRIENDS, BUT KEEP THE OLD , 2012, Maturing with Moxie.

[8]  Lars Backstrom,et al.  Structural diversity in social contagion , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  M. Newman Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  R. Dorfman A Formula for the Gini Coefficient , 1979 .

[11]  Jimmy J. Lin,et al.  WTF: the who to follow service at Twitter , 2013, WWW.

[12]  Xinyi Huang,et al.  Structural Diversity in Social Recommender Systems , 2013, RSWeb@RecSys.

[13]  Sharad Goel,et al.  The Effect of Recommendations on Network Structure , 2016, WWW.

[14]  P. Jaccard,et al.  Etude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des Alpes et des Jura , 1901 .

[15]  Jonathan L. Herlocker,et al.  Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems , 2004, TOIS.

[16]  Jade Goldstein-Stewart,et al.  The Use of MMR, Diversity-Based Reranking for Reordering Documents and Producing Summaries , 1998, SIGIR Forum.

[17]  R. Burt Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  Henry B. Mann,et al.  The Algebra of a Linear Hypothesis , 1960 .

[20]  Linyuan Lü,et al.  Predicting missing links via local information , 2009, 0901.0553.

[21]  Jade Goldstein-Stewart,et al.  The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries , 1998, SIGIR '98.

[22]  Pablo Castells,et al.  Personalized diversification of search results , 2012, SIGIR '12.

[23]  Mi Zhang,et al.  Avoiding monotony: improving the diversity of recommendation lists , 2008, RecSys '08.

[24]  Shlomo Moran,et al.  SALSA: the stochastic approach for link-structure analysis , 2001, TOIS.

[25]  Sinan Aral The Future of Weak Ties1 , 2016, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[27]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think , 2012 .

[28]  Ana-Andreea Stoica,et al.  Algorithmic Glass Ceiling in Social Networks: The effects of social recommendations on network diversity , 2018, WWW.

[29]  Elizabeth M. Daly,et al.  The network effects of recommending social connections , 2010, RecSys '10.

[30]  John Hannon,et al.  Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches , 2010, RecSys '10.

[31]  Pasquale De Meo,et al.  On Facebook, most ties are weak , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[32]  S. Berg Snowball Sampling—I , 2006 .

[33]  P. Schnohr,et al.  Social network diversity and risks of ischemic heart disease and total mortality: findings from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. , 2005, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Friends and neighbors on the Web , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[35]  C. Stegbauer,et al.  Granovetter (1973): The Strength of Weak Ties , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[36]  Dong Wang,et al.  The Who-To-Follow System at Twitter: Strategy, Algorithms, and Revenue Impact , 2015, Interfaces.

[37]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[38]  Nicola Barbieri,et al.  Evolution of Ego-networks in Social Media with Link Recommendations , 2017, WSDM.

[39]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks , 2010, WSDM '11.

[40]  Mahmoud Fouz,et al.  Why rumors spread so quickly in social networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[41]  Ido Guy,et al.  Social Recommender Systems , 2015, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[42]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Neil J. Hurley,et al.  Novelty and Diversity in Top-N Recommendation -- Analysis and Evaluation , 2011, TOIT.

[44]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Make new friends, but keep the old: recommending people on social networking sites , 2009, CHI.

[46]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Ricardo Baeza-Yates,et al.  Modern Information Retrieval - the concepts and technology behind search, Second edition , 2011 .

[48]  Evaggelia Pitoura,et al.  Centrality-Aware Link Recommendations , 2016, WSDM.

[49]  Jong-Hak Lee,et al.  Analyses of multiple evidence combination , 1997, SIGIR '97.

[50]  Guy Shani,et al.  Evaluating Recommender Systems , 2015, Recommender Systems Handbook.