Interfacial factors affecting polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate/wood bond strength

Polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (pMDI) has been used for making wood board composites for over 30 years, although its growth in application has been limited mainly by the perception that it is a high-cost alternative to formaldehyde-based adhesives. Increased use of pMDI adhesive in making wood composites will require optimization of the process variables involved. One such factor is the unresolved question of the interfacial aspects most responsible for building strong wood composites. Some argue that adhesive surface coverage is primarily responsible for board strength; others assert that penetration of the pMDI into the wood matrix is a primary characteristic of strong boards. This article will provide evidence that the interfacial aspect most important in building board strength is surface coverage of the wood particles or fibers. Experiments controlling the depth of pMDI penetration into wood matrices and then measuring their adherend strength were performed. We also calculated the potential efficiencies to be obtained from maximizing the surface coverage and minimizing the matrix penetration using a spherical sector model. Neither high nor low pMDI viscosity offered a significant advantage in surface covering pine or oak, although it is speculated that minimizing the droplet size of pMDI in the resination step could lead to substantial efficiency improvements in adhesive coverage. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 449–455, 2005

[1]  Benjamin L. Wendt,et al.  Efficacy of polymeric MDI/Polyol mixtures for binding wood boards , 2005, Wood Science and Technology.

[2]  Y. Örs,et al.  Bonding strength of some adhesives in wood materials impregnated with Imersol-Aqua , 2004 .

[3]  Erik Serrano,et al.  A numerical study of the shear-strength-predicting capabilities of test specimens for wood-adhesive bonds , 2004 .

[4]  Antonio Pizzi,et al.  Copolymerization in UF/pMDI adhesives networks , 2002 .

[5]  M. Sonnenschein,et al.  Effect of interfacial energetics on the protection of steel and aluminum surfaces by alkyl acid coatings , 2002 .

[6]  C. Frazier,et al.  Double labeled isocyanate resins for the solid-state NMR detection of urethane linkages to wood , 2001 .

[7]  M. Wolcott,et al.  Evaluation of the cure kinetics of the wood/pMDI bondline , 2001 .

[8]  I. Johansson,et al.  Weak boundary layers on wood surfaces , 2000 .

[9]  C. Frazier,et al.  The effects of cure temperature and time on the isocyanate-wood adhesive bondline by 15N CP/MAS NMR , 1996 .

[10]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  Conversion of plastic/cellulose waste into composites. I: Model of the interphase , 1995 .

[11]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  An ATR‐FTIR study on penetration of resins in wood , 1992 .

[12]  A. B. Moustafa,et al.  Some wood polymer composites ii , 1977 .

[13]  J. N. Anand Re: Contact Theory of Adhesion , 1973 .

[14]  J. N. Anand,et al.  Interfacial Contact and Bonding in Autohesion I-Contact Theory , 1969 .