Targeting Liver Lesions for Radiofrequency Ablation: An Experimental Feasibility Study Using a CT–US Fusion Imaging System

Purpose:To investigate the feasibility and validity of real-time guidance using a fusion imaging system that combines ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) in the targeting and subsequent radiofrequency (RF) ablation of a liver target inconspicuous on US. Methods and Materials:The study was designed as an experimental ex vivo study in calf livers with radiopaque internal targets, inconspicuous at US, simulating a focal liver lesion. The study included 2 phases. The initial phase was to examine the feasibility of matching preprocedural volumetric CT data of the calf livers with real-time US using a commercially available multimodality fusion imaging system (Virtual Navigator System, Esaote SpA, Genoa, Italy), and to assess the accuracy of targeting using a 22 gauge cytologic needle. The second phase of the study was to validate such a technique using a 15 gauge RF multitined expandable needle (RITA Medical Systems, Mountain View, CA) and to examine the accuracy of the needle placement relative to the target. The tip of the trocar of the RF needle had to be placed 1 cm from the target and then the hooks had to be deployed to 3 cm. Unenhanced CT of the liver and multiplanar reconstructions were performed to calculate accuracy of positioning, ie, the lateral distance between the needle and the target, the distance between the tip of the trocar of the RF electrode and the target, and the lateral distance between the central tine of the RF electrode and the target. Results:All calf livers underwent successful CT-US registration with a mean registration error of 3.0 ± 0.1 mm and 2.9 ± 0.1 mm in the initial and second phase of the study, respectively. In the initial phase an overall number of 24 insertions were performed after the US-CT guidance. The mean needle to target distance was 1.9 ± 0.7 mm (range, 0.8–3.0 mm). In the second phase an overall number of 12 ablations were performed. The mean target–trocar distance was 10.3 ± 2.6 mm. The mean target-central tine lateral distance was 3.9 ± 0.7 mm (range, 2.9–5.1 mm). After the dissection of the specimen the target was found unchanged in the center of the ablation zone in all cases. Conclusion:Real-time registration and fusion of preprocedure CT volume images with intraprocedure US is feasible and accurate. The study was however conducted in an ideal experimental setting, without patient movements and breathing, and further studies are warranted to validate the system under clinical conditions.

[1]  Young Hun Choi,et al.  Switching Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation Technique Using Multiple, Internally Cooled Electrodes and a Multichannel Generator: Ex Vivo and In Vivo Pilot Study , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[2]  P. Pereira,et al.  Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using Internally Cooled Electrodes in Ex Vivo Bovine Liver: Prediction of Coagulation Volume From Applied Energy , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Eriko Tsukamoto,et al.  PET/CT today: System and its impact on cancer diagnosis , 2006, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[4]  C. Ma,et al.  In-room CT techniques for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[5]  J. Felmlee,et al.  CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of the lung or upper abdomen with a breath-hold monitoring and feedback system: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. , 2005, Radiology.

[6]  S Nahum Goldberg,et al.  Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  P. Giraud,et al.  [Respiration-gated radiotherapy: current techniques and potential benefits]. , 2003, Cancer radiotherapie : journal de la Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique.

[8]  K. Ungersböck,et al.  Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery , 2003, Neurosurgical Review.

[9]  Mathias K. Fehr,et al.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET , 2003, European Radiology.

[10]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  PET/CT of the abdomen: optimizing the patient breathing pattern , 2003, European Radiology.

[11]  A L Oberg,et al.  Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  Isaac N. Bankman,et al.  Handbook of medical imaging , 2000 .

[13]  R C Nelson,et al.  Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time? , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  R C Nelson,et al.  Percutaneous liver biopsy: a cost-benefit analysis comparing sonographic and CT guidance. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  B. Daly,et al.  Real-time CT fluoroscopy: evolution of an interventional tool. , 1999, Radiology.

[16]  A. Thalhammer,et al.  Value of a laser guidance system for CT interventions: a phantom study , 1999, European Radiology.

[17]  R C Nelson,et al.  Abdominal percutaneous interventional procedures: comparison of CT and US guidance. , 1998, Radiology.

[18]  E. Ellison,et al.  Focal liver lesions. , 1994, Postgraduate medicine.

[19]  M. Viergever,et al.  Medical image matching-a review with classification , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[20]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  F. Nüsslin,et al.  New device for CT-targeted percutaneous punctures. , 1991, Radiology.

[22]  A. Magnusson,et al.  CT-Guided Core Biopsy Using a New Guidance Device , 1991, Acta radiologica.

[23]  A. Palestrant,et al.  Comprehensive approach to CT-guided procedures with a hand-held guidance device. , 1990, Radiology.

[24]  R. Alfidi,et al.  Interventional CT scanning. , 1977, Radiologic clinics of North America.