Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment: focus on vericiguat

The nitric oxide (NO)–soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)–cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway is dysregulated in patients with heart failure (HF) resulting in myocardial and vascular dysfunction that contributes to its progression. Vericiguat is a novel direct sGC stimulator that targets in at least two ways the NO–sGC–cGMP pathway with the subsequent restoration of cGMP activity. The VICTORIA trial assessed the effects of vericiguat (versus placebo) in 5050 patients with chronic HF (NYHA class II–IV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <45%, elevated natriuretic peptide levels and a recent HF decompensation (hospitalized or outpatient intravenous diuretics). After a median follow-up of 10.8 months, a lower risk (10% reduction) of the primary combined outcome (cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization) was achieved (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83–0.98; p=0.02). The composite endpoint was driven by HF hospitalizations (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.81–1.00; p=0.048) whilst CV death reduction was not statistically significant on its own. The target dose was achieved in 89% of patients treated with vericiguat, and no significant differences were observed in the rates of syncope or hypotension. The VICTORIA trial showed that vericiguat was safe, well tolerated and without need of laboratory testing. The aim of this review is to provide comprehensive information about vericiguat in terms of its differential mechanism of action and clinical data particularly focused on the VICTORIA trial. A comparison is also made with DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced considering that, in all these contemporary trials, a new study medication was added to the standard triple HF therapy. This is a relevant issue because the VICTORIA trial had a significant but less powerful effect than DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced on HF outcomes in a setting of more severe disease, higher event rate and shorter follow-up. In addition, relevant data on other previous studies are also provided in both HF with reduced LVEF (SOCRATES-Reduced) and HF with preserved LVEF (SOCRATES-Preserved and VITALITY-Preserved). This article is part of the Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/emerging-concepts-in-heart-failure-management-and-treatment

[1]  Dave L Dixon,et al.  2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. , 2022, Journal of cardiac failure.

[2]  D. Atar,et al.  Vericiguat in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction , 2022, European journal of heart failure.

[3]  M. Emdin,et al.  Prognostic Benefit of New Drugs for HFrEF: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[4]  G. Sinagra,et al.  [ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: what's new?] , 2022, Giornale italiano di cardiologia.

[5]  H. Hillege,et al.  A Systematic Review and Network-Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2021, JACC. Heart failure.

[6]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Hemoglobin and Clinical Outcomes in the VerICiguaT Global Study in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (VICTORIA). , 2021, Circulation.

[7]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Vericiguat in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from the VICTORIA trial , 2021, European journal of heart failure.

[8]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Renal function and the effects of vericiguat in patients with worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: insights from the VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with HFrEF) trial , 2021, European journal of heart failure.

[9]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  Effect of Vericiguat vs Placebo on Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction: The VITALITY-HFpEF Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2020, JAMA.

[10]  M. Emdin,et al.  Relative Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan, Vericiguat, and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis , 2020, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[11]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and Clinical Outcomes: Vericiguat Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Study. , 2020, JACC. Heart failure.

[12]  P. Ponikowski,et al.  Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  M. Radtke,et al.  Metabolism and Pharmacokinetic Drug–Drug Interaction Profile of Vericiguat, A Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulator: Results From Preclinical and Phase I Healthy Volunteer Studies , 2020, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[14]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  I. Buchan,et al.  Do patients have worse outcomes in heart failure than in cancer? A primary care‐based cohort study with 10‐year follow‐up in Scotland , 2017, European journal of heart failure.

[16]  W. Sessa,et al.  Contemporary Approaches to Modulating the Nitric Oxide–cGMP Pathway in Cardiovascular Disease , 2017, Circulation research.

[17]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  Vericiguat in patients with worsening chronic heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: results of the SOluble guanylate Cyclase stimulatoR in heArT failurE patientS with PRESERVED EF (SOCRATES-PRESERVED) study , 2017, European heart journal.

[18]  Sanjiv J. Shah,et al.  Effect of Vericiguat, a Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulator, on Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Patients With Worsening Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: The SOCRATES-REDUCED Randomized Trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[19]  M. Vaduganathan,et al.  The vulnerable phase after hospitalization for heart failure , 2015, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[20]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  W. Self,et al.  The burden of acute heart failure on U.S. emergency departments. , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.

[22]  I. Piña,et al.  Forecasting the Impact of Heart Failure in the United States: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association , 2013, Circulation. Heart failure.

[23]  P. Ferdinandy,et al.  Cyclic GMP and protein kinase‐G in myocardial ischaemia‐reperfusion: opportunities and obstacles for survival signaling , 2007, British journal of pharmacology.

[24]  L. Liaudet,et al.  Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. , 2007, Physiological reviews.

[25]  O. V. Evgenov,et al.  NO-independent stimulators and activators of soluble guanylate cyclase: discovery and therapeutic potential , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[26]  U. Walter,et al.  Physiology and pathophysiology of vascular signaling controlled by guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate-dependent protein kinase. , 2004, Acta biochimica Polonica.

[27]  Charles D Searles,et al.  The nitric oxide pathway and oxidative stress in heart failure. , 2002, Congestive heart failure.