Determination of optimal view angles for quantitative facial image analysis.

In quantitative evaluation of facial skin chromophore content using color imaging, several factors such as view angle and facial curvature affect the accuracy of measured values. To determine the influence of view angle and facial curvature on the accuracy of quantitative image analysis, we acquire cross-polarized diffuse reflectance color images of a white-patched mannequin head model and human subjects while varying the angular position of the head with respect to the image acquisition system. With the mannequin head model, the coefficient of variance (CV) is determined to specify an optimal view angle resulting in a relatively uniform light distribution on the region of interest (ROI). Our results indicate that view angle and facial curvature influence the accuracy of the recorded color information and quantitative image analysis. Moreover, there exists an optimal view angle that minimizes the artifacts in color determination resulting from facial curvature. In a specific ROI, the CV is less in smaller regions than in larger regions, and in relatively flat regions. In clinical application, our results suggest that view angle affects the quantitative assessment of port wine stain (PWS) skin erythema, emphasizing the importance of using the optimal view angle to minimize artifacts caused by nonuniform light distribution on the ROI. From these results, we propose that optimal view angles can be identified using the mannequin head model to image specific regions of interest on the face of human subjects.

[1]  Anthony J. Durkin,et al.  Characterization of port wine stain skin erythema and melanin content using cross‐polarized diffuse reflectance imaging , 2004, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[2]  Kukizo Miyamoto,et al.  Development of a digital imaging system for objective measurement of hyperpigmented spots on the face , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[3]  H. Takiwaki,et al.  Graphic analysis of the relationship between skin colour change and variations in the amounts of melanin and haemoglobin , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[4]  G. Hillebrand,et al.  Utilization of a high‐resolution digital imaging system for the objective and quantitative assessment of hyperpigmented spots on the face , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[5]  Adele Sparavigna,et al.  Quantification of erythema using digital camera and computer‐based colour image analysis: a multicentre study , 2002, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[6]  Daniel Malacara,et al.  Color Vision and Colorimetry: Theory and Applications , 2002 .

[7]  S. Alaluf,et al.  The impact of epidermal melanin on objective measurements of human skin colour. , 2002, Pigment cell research.

[8]  R. Barlow,et al.  Objective assessment of port‐wine stains following treatment with the 585 nm pulsed dye laser , 2001, The Australasian journal of dermatology.

[9]  S. Kim,et al.  Objective Evaluation of Treatment Effects on Port‐Wine Stains Using L*a*b* Color Coordinates , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  S. Jacques,et al.  Imaging superficial tissues with polarized light , 2000, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[11]  P. Clarys,et al.  Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter®, the DermaSpectrometer® and the Mexameter® , 2000, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[12]  Yves Vander Haeghen,et al.  An imaging system with calibrated color image acquisition for use in dermatology , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  M. Shriver,et al.  Comparison of narrow-band reflectance spectroscopy and tristimulus colorimetry for measurements of skin and hair color in persons of different biological ancestry. , 2000, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  A. Troilius,et al.  Evaluation of port wine stains by laser Doppler perfusion imaging and reflectance photometry before and after pulsed dye laser treatment. , 1996, Acta dermato-venereologica.

[15]  K. Wilhelm,et al.  Guidelines for measurement skin colour and erythema A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis * , 1996, Contact dermatitis.

[16]  B. Hooper Optical-thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue , 1996 .

[17]  A. Troilius,et al.  Reflectance spectrophotometry in the objective assessment of dye laser‐treated port‐wine stains , 1995, The British journal of dermatology.

[18]  Peter Elsner,et al.  Bioengineering of the skin : cutaneous blood flow and erythema , 1995 .