A blank look in reading: the effect of blank space on the identification of letters and words during reading.

Two experiments investigated the effect of visual blank space on reading by varying the amount of interletter and interline blank space in prose passages. Increasing interletter blank spacing slowed the reading process overall, presumably because it disrupted the unitization of words and word identification, but it also improved the identification of the letters within words. By contrast, increasing interline blank spacing sped up the reading process overall, while also improving the identification of words and the letters within words, presumably because the extra spacing reduced the amount of visual information that was processed during reading. The latter finding supports the conclusion that information from surrounding lines of single-spaced text may interfere with reading.

[1]  D. D. Wheeler.  Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[2]  Hsuan-Chih Chen,et al.  Effects of presentation complexity on rapid-sequential reading , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Understanding Eye Movements in Reading. , 1997 .

[4]  W. Estes,et al.  Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations , 1976 .

[5]  A. Healy,et al.  Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Koichi Oda,et al.  Effective visual field size necessary for vertical reading during Japanese text processing , 1991 .

[7]  Asher Koriat,et al.  The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Semantic processing of unattended text during selective reading: How the eyes see it , 1991 .

[9]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[11]  A. Healy,et al.  Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[12]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers , 1981, Brain and Language.

[13]  A M Liberman,et al.  Duplex perception of cues for stop consonants: Evidence for a phonetic mode , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Executive Control Processes in Reading , 1987 .

[15]  A. Healy,et al.  Detecting phonemes and letters in text: Interactions between different types and levels of processes , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[16]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  K Rayner,et al.  Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Lack of semantic activation from unattended text during passage reading , 1992 .

[19]  G. McConkie,et al.  Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading , 1976 .

[20]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  EFFECT OF MEANING ON LETTER DETECTION , 1995 .

[21]  A. Healy,et al.  Effect of syntactic role and syntactic prominence on letter detection , 1998 .

[22]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[23]  D. Balota,et al.  The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.