How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study

Background Remote Patient Monitoring Systems (RPMS) based on e-health, Nurse Navigators (NNs) and patient engagement can improve patient follow-up and have a positive impact on quality of care (by limiting adverse events) and costs (by reducing readmissions). However, the extent of this impact depends on effective implementation which is often restricted. This is partly due to the lack of attention paid to the RPMS design phase prior to implementation. The content of the RPMS can be carefully designed at this stage and various obstacles anticipated. Our aim was to report on an RPMS design case to provide insights into the methodology required in order to manage this phase. Methods This study was carried out at Gustave Roussy, a comprehensive cancer centre, in France. A multidisciplinary team coordinated the CAPRI RPMS design process (2013–2015) that later produced positive outcomes. Data were collected during eight studies conducted according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework. This project was approved by the French National Data Protection Authorities. Results Based on the study results, the multidisciplinary team defined strategies for resolving obstacles prior to the implementation of CAPRI. Consequently, the final CAPRI design includes a web app with two interfaces (patient and health care professionals) and two NNs. The NNs provide regular follow-up via telephone or email to manage patients’ symptoms and toxicity, treatment compliance and care packages. Patients contact the NNs via a secure messaging system. Eighty clinical decision support tools enable NNs to prioritise and decide on the course of action to be taken. Conclusion In our experience, the RPMS design process and, more generally, that of any complex intervention programme, is an important phase that requires a sound methodological basis. This study is also consistent with the notion that an RPMS is more than a technological innovation. This is indeed an organizational innovation, and principles identified during the design phase can help in the effective use of a RPMS (e.g. locating NNs if possible within the care organization; recruiting NNs with clinical and managerial skills; defining algorithms for clinical decision support tools for assessment, but also for patient decision and orientation).

[1]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Valerie S. Eschiti,et al.  Native cancer navigation: the state of the science. , 2012, Clinical journal of oncology nursing.

[3]  Bradford W Hesse,et al.  Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[4]  A. Fourcade,et al.  Impacts of a navigation program based on health information technology for patients receiving oral anticancer therapy: the CAPRI randomized controlled trial , 2017, BMC Health Services Research.

[5]  L. Suchman,et al.  Reconstructing Technologies as Social Practice , 1999 .

[6]  M. Faber,et al.  Implementation of integrated care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of interventions and effects. , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[7]  A. Edmondson,et al.  Teaming: How Organizations Learn, Innovate, and Compete in the Knowledge Economy , 2012 .

[8]  Mark Conner,et al.  Electronic Systems for Patients to Report and Manage Side Effects of Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Christophe Letellier,et al.  Two-Year Survival Comparing Web-Based Symptom Monitoring vs Routine Surveillance Following Treatment for Lung Cancer , 2019, JAMA.

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[11]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[13]  A. de Silvestri,et al.  Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure , 2011, European journal of heart failure.

[14]  E. Basch,et al.  The Japanese version of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE): psychometric validation and discordance between clinician and patient assessments of adverse events , 2018, Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

[15]  Kelsey S. Dickson,et al.  Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework , 2019, Implementation Science.

[16]  A. Fourcade,et al.  Intervention combining nurse navigators (NNs) and a mobile application versus standard of care (SOC) in cancer patients (pts) treated with oral anticancer agents (OAA): Results of CapRI, a single-center, randomized phase III trial. , 2020 .

[17]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. , 2002, JAMA.

[18]  S. Ziebland,et al.  Communication practices for delivering health behaviour change conversations in primary care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis , 2019, BMC Family Practice.

[19]  Jessica Datta,et al.  Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[20]  Lawrence A Leiter,et al.  Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee , 2013 .

[21]  M. Kris,et al.  Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment , 2017, JAMA.

[22]  M. di Palma,et al.  Analysis of nurse navigators’ activities for hospital discharge coordination: a mixed method study for the case of cancer patients , 2016, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[23]  A. Farmer,et al.  Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Xiaomei Ma,et al.  Global Burden of Cancer , 2006, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[25]  Jaana Woiceshyn,et al.  Integrated versus fragmented implementation of complex innovations in acute health care , 2016, Health care management review.

[26]  Keith W. Boone,et al.  Pediatric palliative care and eHealth opportunities for patient-centered care. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[27]  C. Sicotte,et al.  Usages des technologies de l'information et de communication pour la coordination des soins en cancérologie : État des connaissances. Quelles recommandations pour une implantation efficace ? , 2013 .

[28]  Lionel Tarassenko,et al.  Using the Medical Research Council framework for development and evaluation of complex interventions in a low resource setting to develop a theory-based treatment support intervention delivered via SMS text message to improve blood pressure control , 2018, BMC Health Services Research.

[29]  Nobhojit Roy,et al.  The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[30]  What Are the Unmet Information Needs of Cancer Patients? A Qualitative Study , 2017 .

[31]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Complex interventions , 2022, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

[32]  Mark Olfson,et al.  Interventions to improve medication adherence in schizophrenia. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.

[33]  J. Temel,et al.  A Systematic Review of Adherence to Oral Antineoplastic Therapies. , 2016, The oncologist.

[34]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Michele Angelaccio,et al.  Remote Patient Monitoring via Non-Invasive Digital Technologies: A Systematic Review , 2017, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[36]  Anneke L. Francke,et al.  Effects of eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with cancer: A meta-review , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[37]  Lesli S. Ott,et al.  Outcomes and costs of remote patient monitoring among patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators: An economic model based on the PREDICT RM database , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[38]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations , 2001 .

[39]  Eric J Feuer,et al.  Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[40]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  Lisa Abdallah EverCare Nurse Practitioner Practice Activities: Similarities and Differences across Five Sites , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.

[42]  L. Wood A review on adherence management in patients on oral cancer therapies. , 2012, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[43]  Susan Michie,et al.  Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method , 2009, Implementation science : IS.

[44]  Paige May,et al.  Oral anticancer therapy: a comprehensive assessment of patient perceptions and challenges. , 2016, The Journal of community and supportive oncology.

[45]  P. Ho,et al.  Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence: A Review , 2018, JAMA.

[46]  J. Alison,et al.  Feasibility of an Interactive Patient Portal for Monitoring Physical Activity, Remote Symptom Reporting, and Patient Education in Oncology: Qualitative Study , 2019, JMIR cancer.

[47]  Guy Paré,et al.  Linking IT implementation and acceptance via the construct of psychological ownership of information technology , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[48]  H. Freeman Patient navigation: a community centered approach to reducing cancer mortality. , 2006, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[49]  P. Wiffen INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE CONTINUITY OF CARE IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS WITH CANCER , 2012 .

[50]  C. Donaldson,et al.  Optimisation of complex health interventions prior to a randomised controlled trial: a scoping review of strategies used , 2016, Pilot and Feasibility Studies.

[51]  Claire Glenton,et al.  Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[52]  M. Brouwers,et al.  Interventions to improve care coordination between primary healthcare and oncology care providers: a systematic review , 2016, ESMO Open.

[53]  Peter Schröder-Bäck,et al.  Criteria for evaluating transferability of health interventions: a systematic review and thematic synthesis , 2018, Implementation Science.

[54]  É. Minvielle,et al.  Identification of appropriate and potentially avoidable emergency department referrals in a tertiary cancer care center , 2017, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[55]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. , 2002, JAMA.

[56]  J. Alison,et al.  An Interactive Web Portal for Tracking Oncology Patient Physical Activity and Symptoms: Prospective Cohort Study , 2018, JMIR cancer.

[57]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework , 2017, Implementation Science.

[58]  T. Finch,et al.  Using Normalization Process Theory in feasibility studies and process evaluations of complex healthcare interventions: a systematic review , 2018, Implementation Science.

[59]  Simonetta Scalvini,et al.  Maugeri Centre for Telehealth and Telecare: A real-life integrated experience in chronic patients , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[60]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Telemedicine: A practice-based approach to technology , 2010 .

[61]  S. Mohile,et al.  Using Information Technology in the Assessment and Monitoring of Geriatric Oncology Patients , 2018, Current Oncology Reports.

[62]  A. Fourcade,et al.  Internet-based technologies to improve cancer care coordination: current use and attitudes among cancer patients. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[63]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Developing and evaluating the implementation of a complex intervention: using mixed methods to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial of an oral healthcare intervention after stroke , 2011, Trials.

[64]  Elizabeth Allen,et al.  Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[65]  Claudio Eccher,et al.  Optimisation and validation of a remote monitoring system (Onco-TreC) for home-based management of oral anticancer therapies: an Italian multicentre feasibility study , 2017, BMJ Open.